Meuh6879 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2016, 11:01:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
johnyj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2016, 11:07:45 PM |
|
Let it be full and see what happens ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2016, 11:14:18 PM |
|
This depends on the filtering rules that nodes use. Let it be full and see what happens ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Nothing. If the transactions are indeed spam, then transactions with proper fees and adequate priority will process just fine.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
AgentofCoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2016, 11:17:51 PM |
|
12-13k tx pending is nothing... back in October 2015 we had over 80k tx waiting in the mempool for 3 weeks straight.
|
I support a decentralized & unregulatable ledger first, with safe scaling over time. Request a signed message if you are associating with anyone claiming to be me.
|
|
|
croTek4
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
the Cat-a-clysm.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2016, 11:45:26 PM |
|
This depends on the filtering rules that nodes use. Let it be full and see what happens ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Nothing. If the transactions are indeed spam, then transactions with proper fees and adequate priority will process just fine. What if they're not spam, but legitimate transactions?
|
Catether is an open source mineable ERC20 Token, powered by Cates.
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4652
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2016, 11:46:30 PM |
|
lol lots of transactions are sitting in mempool and it seems like antpool is not pulling its weight with a history of low amounts of transactions per block 0.0002mb(0.2kb)0.731mb(731kb)0.0002mb(0.2kb)0.731mb(731kb)also they are in iceland.. not china.. but wait.. where is all the racism aimed to the icelandics??
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
notbatman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 19, 2016, 11:49:28 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
johnyj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 03:59:00 AM |
|
This depends on the filtering rules that nodes use. Let it be full and see what happens ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Nothing. If the transactions are indeed spam, then transactions with proper fees and adequate priority will process just fine. I just want to see the effect of a rising min relay fee. How expensive is enough to stop people from using bitcoin? For rich people moves thousands of coins, even 1 btc fee is nothing, so they will not be affected. If average people is moving 0.1 btc, then 0.001 btc would still be ok (1% fee), that's still almost 10x higher than current fee
|
|
|
|
tobacco123
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 04:21:25 AM |
|
Any particular reason for the stress tests? Is it related to the block-size debate?
|
|
|
|
watashi-kokoto
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 12:37:40 PM |
|
Any particular reason for the stress tests? Is it related to the block-size debate?
Seems like some entity is trying to boost the blocks are small argument.
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 12:54:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Erkallys
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 01:12:07 PM |
|
Any particular reason for the stress tests? Is it related to the block-size debate?
Maybe the Bitcoin Classic cartel who's using the strengh to make us see that our current blocksize isn't enough...
|
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 02:43:51 PM |
|
Everything is fine, 1MB block size is more than enough for current usage, in the future, when necessary we will scale bitcoin, there's plenty of time. Let's make another #ScalingBitcoin conference because consensus. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com%2Fimages%2F07-minister.jpg&t=665&c=pUzH-wXk8q_3_A)
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 03:59:03 PM Last edit: January 20, 2016, 04:35:23 PM by Amph |
|
ah fuck that's why my transaction is stuck there forever, i got caught off guard this time, and there is written high priority
and yet many still say that 1mb is acceptable and the situation is not that bad, lol, something like this if was happening when bitcoin was well adopted, would cause major problem
|
|
|
|
Kprawn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 04:25:39 PM |
|
a fuck that's why my transaction is stuck there forever, i got caught off guard this time, and there is written high priority
and yet many still say that 1mb is acceptable and the situation is not that bad, lol, something like this if was happening when bitcoin was well adopted, would cause major problem
I smell a rat.... Could it be someone or a group of people trying to artificially bump the transactions and filling the blocks to prepare for Bitcoin Classic? Nobody has warned of a stress test, so let's see how long they can keep this up. The last stress test cost a shitload of money and it did not last long before everything returned to normal. Just imagine everyone pushing for 2mb Block sizes and it happening ....THEN once it's done, everything goes back to normal and we cannot even fill a quarter of these blocks.
|
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 04:28:31 PM |
|
a fuck that's why my transaction is stuck there forever, i got caught off guard this time, and there is written high priority
and yet many still say that 1mb is acceptable and the situation is not that bad, lol, something like this if was happening when bitcoin was well adopted, would cause major problem
I smell a rat.... Could it be someone or a group of people trying to artificially bump the transactions and filling the blocks to prepare for Bitcoin Classic? Nobody has warned of a stress test, so let's see how long they can keep this up. The last stress test cost a shitload of money and it did not last long before everything returned to normal. Just imagine everyone pushing for 2mb Block sizes and it happening ....THEN once it's done, everything goes back to normal and we cannot even fill a quarter of these blocks. Dude, it's been like this for weeks and today isn't even particularly bad. Check block sizes here: https://chain.btc.com/en/block
|
|
|
|
xdrpx
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 04:29:13 PM |
|
Oh well more of these are expected to happen. Someone must have been doing a stress test cause the charts indicate a sharp bump and drop in transactions which is very obvious. I think blockchain.info was showing up 9000 + unconfirmed transactions, but I believe this isn't on of those worst stress tests.
|
|
|
|
Klestin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 04:54:39 PM |
|
Nothing. If the transactions are indeed spam, then transactions with proper fees and adequate priority will process just fine.
Yeah, nothing. Except nodes begin to crash. Resulting in the very centralization that was feared by some if we moved to larger block sizes.
|
|
|
|
Quantus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 883
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 20, 2016, 05:33:30 PM |
|
Its a pool party a mempool party ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
(I am a 1MB block supporter who thinks all users should be using Full-Node clients) Avoid the XT shills, they only want to destroy bitcoin, their hubris and greed will destroy us. Know your adversary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
|
|
|
|