FRC exchange!

[smoothie]

I've got 3000 FRC for sale

PM me an offer, BTC or LTC

No thanks. FRC is a waste of time in my view.

[c4n10]

Sold 1,000 FRC to dego

Smooth transaction - quick, easy and painless trade...

[dego]

I can confirm that smooth transaction I had with c4n10.
good guy!

[Bowjob]

Selling Dota 2 for FRCs

[Nolo]

Selling FRC.  1000 FRC @ .3 BTC or make me an offer for 35,000 FRC.  PM me.  

***EDITED:  REVISED PRICE***

[nethead]

Selling 840 FRC for 0.34 BTC, ratio is the same as auction which ended here. Alternatively, I'll sell for 75 LTC. You send first unless you have 500+ posts.

Still unsold. Someone buy those shitcoins from me please so I can remove client from my computer.

If noone gets them, i can get them to make your life easier, my address is below

[Rubberduckie]

I've got 3000 FRC for sale @ 0.3 BTC per 1K

pm me if interested


cheers

[ralree]

6000 for sale at 0.3BTC/1000.
SOLD.

[jtimon]

I'm buying at 0.2 btc per 1K frc

[DeathAndTaxes]

Bid/Ask at beginning of thread was B:0.5 | A:1.0  (BTC per 1K FRC)
Now it is B:0.2 | A: 0.3

How low can it go? Think we will see 0.1 per 1K by the end of the week?
The good news for the "foundation" is that even at 0.1 per 1K their 80M FRC is worth > $100K USD.

[scrybe]

Bid/Ask at beginning of thread was B:0.5 | A:1.0  (BTC per 1K FRC)
Now it is B:0.2 | A: 0.3

How low can it go? Think we will see 0.1 per 1K by the end of the week?
The good news for the "foundation" is that even at 0.1 per 1K their 80M FRC is worth > $100K USD.

If you parse a bit more closely you will see that nothing was executed at 1/1000. I was throwing that (FRC sell order) out as a first attempt to set a value and get some trade going. Within a day I was buying at 0.1/1000, then it progressed to 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.31, and 0.4/1000 as the difficulty increased. My line for buying is currently around 0.3/1000.

Most transactions I'm seeing are still in the 0.3-0.4 range, and the general pressure seems to be up, not down.

Granted, a lot of value is on the speculation side, but we've seen a few sale transactions flowing at the same rates.

Maybe it will drop to 0.1 as the buzz dies down, but as long as folks are selling at "cost of mining" type numbers with the difficulty where it is or higher, I doubt it.

Something else you might want also have backwards, what if the foundation coins are used in a way that increases the value of FRC? If real world use drives the price up to $.01/FRC we would have a very robust network of subsidized miners and $1M market cap. It's nice that the foundation coins might be worth something, but converting them on an exchange to fund a project is being frowned upon pretty hard in the governance thread. The best uses for FRC will not rely on it's (arbitrary) value as defined on this thread, but will create value themselves by enabling a community.

I'm actually pretty pleased I got within an order of magnitude on my first try, I'd like to challenge you to do better on the next alt-coin of interest.

[bushstar]

I'd say Scrybe set the initial price of FRC for all.

Whatever the next alt-coin is I sincerely doubt it will get anywhere near the level of interest of FRC. I'm still looking forward to playing with it. I love all the alt-coins and would love to see MicroCash come out.

[Nolo]

Good trade with dego.  Now selling 30k FRC @ .3 BTC per 1k. 

[jjiimm_64]

Good trade with dego.  Now selling 30k FRC @ .3 BTC per 1k. 

Ill take em

[Nolo]

Good trade with dego.  Now selling 30k FRC @ .3 BTC per 1k. 

Ill take em

30k sold to jjimm_64.  Great trade. 

[jjiimm_64]

Good trade with dego.  Now selling 30k FRC @ .3 BTC per 1k. 

Ill take em

30k sold to jjimm_64.  Great trade. 

yes..  interestingly, even tho 3 10k's were all in block 14588, only 2 confirmed in the next block..

[Nolo]

Good trade with dego.  Now selling 30k FRC @ .3 BTC per 1k.  

Ill take em

30k sold to jjimm_64.  Great trade.  

yes..  interestingly, even tho 3 10k's were all in block 14588, only 2 confirmed in the next block..

Never seen that before.  Wonder what would cause that.  Possible I sent it at the exact same moment the block was found?  I'll be interested to see if it gets 1 confirm, while the other two transfers get 2 confirm in the next block.  

Edit:  Yep that's what happened.  2, 2, 1 confirmations for the three transactions on the next block. 

[jtimon]

Maybe you're confusing the reference block of the transaction with the block it got into the chain?

Each transaction contains a reference block that is used to calculate the demurrage. I'm not sure that's what is happening but since this is different from bitcoin, it may be confusing to unaware users.

[DeathAndTaxes]

Good trade with dego.  Now selling 30k FRC @ .3 BTC per 1k. 

Ill take em

30k sold to jjimm_64.  Great trade. 

yes..  interestingly, even tho 3 10k's were all in block 14588, only 2 confirmed in the next block..

Never seen that before.  Wonder what would cause that.  Possible I sent it at the exact same moment the block was found?  I'll be interested to see if it gets 1 confirm, while the other two transfers get 2 confirm in the next block. 

Edit:  Yep that's what happened.  2, 2, 1 confirmations for the three transactions on the next block. 

I think you are confused. 

1 confirm = "Included in a block"
2 confirms = a block found after the block the tx was included in.
3 confirms = 2 blocks found after the block the tx was included in.
....
n confirms = n-1 blocks found after the block the the tx was included in.

[Nolo]

Good trade with dego.  Now selling 30k FRC @ .3 BTC per 1k. 

Ill take em

30k sold to jjimm_64.  Great trade. 

yes..  interestingly, even tho 3 10k's were all in block 14588, only 2 confirmed in the next block..

Never seen that before.  Wonder what would cause that.  Possible I sent it at the exact same moment the block was found?  I'll be interested to see if it gets 1 confirm, while the other two transfers get 2 confirm in the next block. 

Edit:  Yep that's what happened.  2, 2, 1 confirmations for the three transactions on the next block. 

I think you are confused. 

1 confirm = "Included in a block"
2 confirms = a block found after the block the tx was included in.
3 confirms = 2 blocks found after the block the tx was included in.
....
n confirms = n-1 blocks found after the block the the tx was included in.

jtimon had it right.  I didn't double check what jjimm_64 said, and just assumed they were in the same block. He was looking at the "reference block" instead of the block in which the transactions were included in.  And then I just explained my thoughts poorly in the followup post lol.