Let's suppose that someone leaves his/her family and gets his/her independence. If the primitive accumulation of capital doesn' t matter, then why not to be a whore (male or female) in order to start his/her life with an amount of money?
Why not, if that's what he/she is willing to do and others are willing to pay for it? That's the whole purpose of money: if a person is willing to offer something (anything) that other people want, money allows them to make a fair and equitable trade.
What is the evolution done with bitcoin relative to the true gold: we are not mining with hands but with algebra and encryption theory due to suitable hardware/software
Nobody mines gold with their hands either, or even picks and shovels. It's all done with big, expensive machines.
What is the difference between bitcoin community and the community of bankers? They didn' t care at all about the first origin of money (read history to ensure this)
Why to replace an inmoral and cynical money system with a similar one then?
Asked and answered. See my previous post.
The problem of scarcity in economics again here: "bitcoin has value because it is hard to make it"(!):
- This argument is ancient! I thought that a currency of new era could by-pass this... How? Wait for new currencies, after bitcoin..
Scarcity, in economics, simply means that people want more of something than they've got and can get. For example, people want lots of gold, but they don't all have lots of gold and they can't all get lots of gold - that's what it means to say "gold is scarce". A moments thought will make it clear why scarcity is an
absolute requirement for something to be used as money, which cannot be "bypassed": if money
isn't scarce, that means everybody has all the money they'll ever want, and they don't want any more than they've got. But if nobody wants any more money than they already have, why would they accept your money as payment? It doesn't make any sense.
I think you're confusing money and wealth again.
Money is not wealth. Money is a representation of wealth. You want everyone to be wealthy. Who doesn't? But there's only so much
stuff of value in the world, and not everyone will necessarily have all the things of value that they want. That's not fair, but life isn't fair, and it's got nothing to do with money, as money is just a
representation of value: if you have money, it means you provided something of value to someone, which they paid you for. And that's the
only thing it means to have money. If everyone were given money that they didn't obtain by producing things of value, what would that money represent?
Nothing! That money would be
worthless, as it does
not represent actual value that someone produced.