GravityBits (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
February 03, 2016, 12:05:43 AM Last edit: February 03, 2016, 12:28:43 AM by GravityBits |
|
To our supporters, First off we wanted to say thank you, we had a great launch. The first stage of GravityBits was a success. Proof of Work is now over and is currently in its HiPos stage. This stage will last until block 300,000. A complete block schedule is shown below. Now moving forward… Over the next few weeks, gravitybits.xyz will have its new face. GravityBits is going to be an online auction site for everything cryptocurrency and more. The site is going to consist of two main features. Penny bidding and member auctions. Penny bidding will be the first feature to launch for GravityBits. For those who don’t know what penny bidding is, here’s a good example: http://www.beezid.com/For now this is all the information we are releasing. Sorry we are keeping this short, we just wanted to give everyone the direction we are heading with GravityBits. Other notes: A new forum is being setup on forum.gravitybits.xyzBitcointalk will also be updated with all new information and will be monitored daily. We will be working with a few exchanges to make it easy to purchase GravityBits to be used on the site. Block schedule: http://s11.postimg.org/qc07bq3w3/blocksechedule.png
|
|
|
|
HammyCoin
|
|
February 03, 2016, 01:38:00 AM Last edit: February 05, 2016, 03:55:02 AM by HammyCoin |
|
Stake systems as they are normally characterized by their developers:
POS - Coin age is used in the calculation for both stake weight AND the staking reward. Staking reward is set by the coin's APR. The effect is a stable, consistent interest for all staking wallets, regardless of input size or reasonable downtime.
First coin: NXT Peercoin.
HiPOS - Coin age is used in the calculation for stake weight, but not staking reward. Staking reward is fixed per a schedule. Results in stable, consistent interest for staking wallets as long as down time is minimal and inputs are small. Large input size is harshly punished by HiPOS.
First coin: BitBeans.
DPOS - Coin age is irrelevant. All coins that are mature will add the same staking weight (usually 1 in the wallet hover display). Results in stable, consistent interest only for active wallets and only with small inputs. Downtime and large inputs will significantly impact your interest with DPOS. On the plus side, no age means that moving coins is less costly because lost coin age is not detrimental.
First coin: I don't remember, something crappy.
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
|
February 03, 2016, 01:52:03 AM Last edit: February 03, 2016, 02:09:14 AM by JCJr222 |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked.
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
|
February 03, 2016, 02:10:20 AM |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked. Going once...
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
|
February 03, 2016, 02:11:03 AM |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked. Going twice...
|
|
|
|
netoo
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
February 03, 2016, 02:14:45 AM |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked. Going twice... How many do you have, and how much?
|
|
|
|
netoo
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
February 03, 2016, 02:52:32 AM |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked. Going twice... How many do you have, and how much? Only 6,051. Selling at 1,000 sats each. That almost covers mining costs I just got a pm from the dev and they said they contacted yobit and it should be listed within a day or two.
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
|
February 03, 2016, 02:53:43 AM |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked. Going twice... How many do you have, and how much? PM me an offer
|
|
|
|
anticlimax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 03, 2016, 03:13:03 AM Last edit: February 03, 2016, 03:55:19 AM by anticlimax |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked. You expect someone to buy your coins after implying they'll be royally fucked in the process? You must be retarded.
|
twitter @antiiclimax
|
|
|
netoo
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
February 03, 2016, 04:03:13 AM |
|
He just doesn't believe in the project. No biggie. I think its a great idea. Those types of sites generate a lot of revenue. And isn't that what cryptos need, income.
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
|
February 03, 2016, 10:48:25 AM |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked. You expect someone to buy your coins after implying they'll be royally fucked in the process? You must be retarded. I implied that and then he asked how much. So who exactly is the retarded one in this scenario? lol
|
|
|
|
jc12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
|
February 03, 2016, 10:51:46 AM |
|
What are the plans for this coin?
Your guess is as good as ours... We'll see. No signs of anything bad yet considering the dev(s) haven't even gotten in contact with any exchanges yet. Though that could change by the time this is posted EDIT: They just released their plans. Anyone want to purchase some coins?? This just turned into some infomercial shit... If not, I'll burn them to avoid someone getting royally fucked. Going twice... How many do you have, and how much? Assuming he did not solo - he found 4700 for the MN pool. Add a few stakes to that if he staked and he should have around 4700-6000.
|
|
|
|
anticlimax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 05, 2016, 08:37:58 AM |
|
|
twitter @antiiclimax
|
|
|
DanWalker
|
|
February 05, 2016, 08:55:20 AM |
|
coin is working for me
|
|
|
|
xadsa418
|
|
February 05, 2016, 09:50:22 AM |
|
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch ComputeMinWork Good arch SendMessages Good shrmcoin CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch GetTransaction Good shrmcoin ComputeMinStake Good arch CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019; Manually inspected, Good ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=5c77fb68fcd0580d7737; Manually inspected, Good CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin CheckProofOfWork Good arch CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit'] GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info? As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed. Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
|
|
|
|
jc12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
|
February 05, 2016, 10:07:47 AM |
|
Nice code review.
|
|
|
|
anticlimax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 05, 2016, 10:22:19 AM |
|
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch ComputeMinWork Good arch SendMessages Good shrmcoin CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch GetTransaction Good shrmcoin ComputeMinStake Good arch CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019; Manually inspected, Good ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=5c77fb68fcd0580d7737; Manually inspected, Good CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin CheckProofOfWork Good arch CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit'] GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info? As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed. Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Great stuff. Appreciate the code review.
|
twitter @antiiclimax
|
|
|
matveevka
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 06, 2016, 11:56:23 AM |
|
When you see a playground for bidding? To start POS need to know the price of the coin
|
|
|
|
SIX3P0
|
|
February 06, 2016, 04:50:29 PM |
|
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch ComputeMinWork Good arch SendMessages Good shrmcoin CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch GetTransaction Good shrmcoin ComputeMinStake Good arch CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019; Manually inspected, Good ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=5c77fb68fcd0580d7737; Manually inspected, Good CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin CheckProofOfWork Good arch CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit'] GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info? As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed. Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Last time I saw this it was to get on BITTREX, is that the deal here?
|
|
|
|
ROBERTO
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1421
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 08, 2016, 05:31:30 PM |
|
Any news GravityBits?
|
|
|
|
|