Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2014, 02:37:00 AM *
News: Due to the OpenSSL heartbleed bug, changing your forum password is recommended.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: windows vs linux mining efficiency  (Read 3736 times)
kokojie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882


tblob.org


View Profile

Ignore
June 08, 2011, 02:43:38 PM
 #1

Anyone have concrete numbers on mining efficiency for windows vs linux?  I'm planning to get a mining rig, but not sure if I should go with windows or linux? if the efficiency is similar, I'm willing to sacrifice up to 5% efficiency for the ease of set up and use with windows gui miner.

If my post has been helpful, send me some love -> BTC: 1kokojUapmWqCqPw3Ch2rjcVh57tJEzka | PPC: PDyXAgA8eH47gokVW6zVZPSuu15aao5nZF | LTC: LRDpNJM5nkXFBDoxWRCk5hicvT7TrXQZ3c
The Big List of Bitcoin | My reputation | Free 20GB cloud storage from copy.com
1397875020
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1397875020

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1397875020
Reply with quote  #2

1397875020
Report to moderator
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1397875020
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1397875020

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1397875020
Reply with quote  #2

1397875020
Report to moderator
1397875020
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1397875020

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1397875020
Reply with quote  #2

1397875020
Report to moderator
1397875020
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1397875020

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1397875020
Reply with quote  #2

1397875020
Report to moderator
1397875020
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1397875020

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1397875020
Reply with quote  #2

1397875020
Report to moderator
brunoshady
SCAMMER
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile

Ignore
June 08, 2011, 02:44:24 PM
 #2

I would like to know this too
Crazy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168


View Profile

Ignore
June 08, 2011, 04:39:59 PM
 #3

Good question, I'd like to know the same.
Disposition
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122


View Profile

Ignore
June 08, 2011, 04:45:01 PM
 #4

If you aren't a Linux user...

the windows hashrate and ease of set up is much more preferred, not to mention most of the (better) OC tools are also on windows.

I only use Linux for 2 major things, aside from the very small % hashrate increase.

I need SSH, ssh allows me to remotely restart miners, check tempature, set OC and other tech related stuff.
Hashkill allows me to run multi-gpu configurations with 1 miner instance.

Raize
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


View Profile

Ignore
June 08, 2011, 05:07:41 PM
 #5

Linux overclocking is slightly more difficult if you're used to windows. The difference seems to be minor, you get more of a difference almost between which mining software than which operating system in my experience. Maybe I'll be kicking myself in 15 years that I didn't get that extra .03 BTC, but oh well.

OrganofCorti's Neighbourhood Pool Watch - The most informative website on blockchain health
hugolp
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile

Ignore
June 08, 2011, 05:10:20 PM
 #6

If you aren't a Linux user...

the windows hashrate and ease of set up is much more preferred, not to mention most of the (better) OC tools are also on windows.

I only use Linux for 2 major things, aside from the very small % hashrate increase.

I need SSH, ssh allows me to remotely restart miners, check tempature, set OC and other tech related stuff.
Hashkill allows me to run multi-gpu configurations with 1 miner instance.

Is Hashkill better for linux than phatck?
frontsidebus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9


View Profile

Ignore
June 08, 2011, 05:28:20 PM
 #7

Does anyone have some actual numbers they can post?

I have a technet subscriptions so Windows installs are basically free for me, but I am also reasonably competent with *nix OS's.

At this point I just wander if it's worth taking a day to reconfigure for ubuntu.
stapler117
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55


View Profile

Ignore
June 08, 2011, 06:07:20 PM
 #8

I don't have exact numbers, but I probably got another 5-10Mhash/s out of my sapphire 5830 (currently at 265 Mhah/s) by switching to linux. I only used windows in the beginning to experiment with bitcoin mining. Linux is much easier to deploy and manage on multiple systems.

I'm an ex-miner. I still love bitcoins, but I've decided it's too expensive to mine for me. Lowered the difficulty a bit for the rest of you Wink

Eat FibreOne bars. they are made of pure deliciousness
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!