visdude
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
 |
March 13, 2016, 10:36:05 PM |
|
My online Armory wallets are 93.3 and my offline wallets are 92.3 (Windows) and 93.2 (Linux). Will these offline wallet versions be compatible with the next release (0.94) and beyond especially with the implementation of SW?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005
|
|
March 13, 2016, 10:42:06 PM |
|
My online Armory wallets are 93.3 and my offline wallets are 92.3 (Windows) and 93.2 (Linux). Will these offline wallet versions be compatible with the next release (0.94) and beyond especially with the implementation of SW?
Yes, it will be compatible, at least for now |
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
March 13, 2016, 10:42:09 PM |
|
My online Armory wallets are 93.3 and my offline wallets are 92.3 (Windows) and 93.2 (Linux). Will these offline wallet versions be compatible with the next release (0.94) and beyond especially with the implementation of SW?
These versions will still be compatible however you should consider upgrading. 0.94 has a new database structure which reduces the databases by a massive amount (from 60+ Gb to a 300 Mb IIRC). |
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2016, 11:20:43 PM |
|
My online Armory wallets are 93.3 and my offline wallets are 92.3 (Windows) and 93.2 (Linux). Will these offline wallet versions be compatible with the next release (0.94) and beyond especially with the implementation of SW?
Yes, it will be compatible, at least for now These versions will still be compatible however you should consider upgrading. 0.94 has a new database structure which reduces the databases by a massive amount (from 60+ Gb to a 300 Mb IIRC).
Thanks for the quick replies. Pardon me as I've not been able to follow this thread for a couple of weeks now but is there already an official release of 0.94? If so, where can I get it? With Windows, I'm aware that the same executable can be used to install both online and offline wallets. With Linux (I have Mint), I think the offline wallet installation requires a separate "offline package", IIRC. Would it still be the same installation procedures with 0.94? |
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
March 13, 2016, 11:28:07 PM |
|
Thanks for the quick replies.
Pardon me as I've not been able to follow this thread for a couple of weeks now but is there already an official release of 0.94? If so, where can I get it?
Not yet, just a testing release. The latest testing release is available at https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/releases/tag/0.93.99.1With Windows, I'm aware that the same executable can be used to install both online and offline wallets. With Linux (I have Mint), I think the offline wallet installation requires a separate "offline package", IIRC. Would it still be the same installation procedures with 0.94?
When the official release comes out, it should all be the same installation procedure. |
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 14, 2016, 01:19:42 AM |
|
Thanks for the quick replies.
Pardon me as I've not been able to follow this thread for a couple of weeks now but is there already an official release of 0.94? If so, where can I get it?
Not yet, just a testing release. The latest testing release is available at https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/releases/tag/0.93.99.1With Windows, I'm aware that the same executable can be used to install both online and offline wallets. With Linux (I have Mint), I think the offline wallet installation requires a separate "offline package", IIRC. Would it still be the same installation procedures with 0.94?
When the official release comes out, it should all be the same installation procedure. Thanks for the info. |
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
March 14, 2016, 09:55:42 PM |
|
Compressed keys? (The private ones that begin with K or L instead of 5.)
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
March 14, 2016, 09:58:38 PM |
|
Compressed keys? (The private ones that begin with K or L instead of 5.)
Not yet. It is on the todo list. |
|
|
|
goatpig (OP)
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1345
Armory Developer
|
|
March 27, 2016, 07:12:01 PM |
|
@goatpig I deleted some torrent code and submitted to the CleanUpATI branch but it seems like it's not up to date with master, so that led to a lot of commits. Am I doing something wrong? I doesn't matter which branch you push these kind changes to, I merge PRs manually anyways. dev is unstable right now, I'll merge that stuff in once it builds again. |
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
March 28, 2016, 02:29:01 AM |
|
I doesn't matter which branch you push these kind changes to, I merge PRs manually anyways. dev is unstable right now, I'll merge that stuff in once it builds again.
So do I need to resubmit the PR? You can just reopen it. Go to the PR and you should have a button which allows you to reopen the PR. |
|
|
|
BitcoinNewsMagazine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
|
|
March 28, 2016, 03:23:53 AM |
|
Realistically will Armory ever support Trezor within a reasonable time frame (6 months)?
|
|
|
|
|
AussieHash
|
|
March 28, 2016, 05:15:04 AM |
|
Realistically will Armory ever support Trezor within a reasonable time frame (6 months)?
If your rationale is privacy, sync to your own node, slush suggests there will be a solution for that tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
goatpig (OP)
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1345
Armory Developer
|
|
March 28, 2016, 09:24:27 AM |
|
I doesn't matter which branch you push these kind changes to, I merge PRs manually anyways. dev is unstable right now, I'll merge that stuff in once it builds again.
So do I need to resubmit the PR? I merge manually, i.e. I pull all PRs locally and git merge to the branch of my choosing. You can PR to any branch you want, it doesn't make much of a difference from my stand point. What you need to be careful about is basing your work on a commit that won't cause too many merge conflicts. Ideally you want to submit changes that are completely orthogonal to what other me and other contributors are doing, so as to reduce conflicts and overlaps. |
|
|
|
goatpig (OP)
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1345
Armory Developer
|
|
March 28, 2016, 09:26:37 AM |
|
Realistically will Armory ever support Trezor within a reasonable time frame (6 months)?
Getting there. |
|
|
|
|
maxmint
|
|
April 30, 2016, 12:58:16 PM |
|
Is there any way to download old versions of Armory? I'm looking for the 0.92.3 offline bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 but unfortunately can't find this anywhere. Thanks for any hints.
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6581
Just writing some code
|
|
April 30, 2016, 02:29:42 PM |
|
Is there any way to download old versions of Armory? I'm looking for the 0.92.3 offline bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 but unfortunately can't find this anywhere. Thanks for any hints.
The oldest ones are 0.93.3. If you want older, you will need to build it yourself. But why do you want old software? |
|
|
|
BitMaxz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 2965
Block halving is coming.
|
|
April 30, 2016, 02:38:02 PM |
|
Is there any way to download old versions of Armory? I'm looking for the 0.92.3 offline bundle for Ubuntu 12.04 but unfortunately can't find this anywhere. Thanks for any hints.
The oldest ones are 0.93.3. If you want older, you will need to build it yourself. But why do you want old software? I think old software for now is useless and its better to use the latest version has fixed new blocks headers issue.. |
|
|
|
|
ABISprotocol
|
|
June 08, 2016, 03:45:18 AM |
|
My online Armory wallets are 93.3 and my offline wallets are 92.3 (Windows) and 93.2 (Linux). Will these offline wallet versions be compatible with the next release (0.94) and beyond especially with the implementation of SW?
These versions will still be compatible however you should consider upgrading. 0.94 has a new database structure which reduces the databases by a massive amount (from 60+ Gb to a 300 Mb IIRC). Goatpig / others, will the next release support offline transactions? (Right now I think you have to offline sign with 0.92 and broadcast with 0.93.3, or am I mistaken? Can any version handle offline transactions?) see for example: http://betteroffbitcoin.com/a-protocol-for-offline-bitcoin-over-radio-transactions/ (something which I think is very cool) |
|
|
|
|
gangtraet
|
|
June 08, 2016, 07:31:23 AM |
|
Any reasonably new version of Armory can handle offline signing for any other reasonably new version of Armory.
What goatpig wrote was that he would not release precompiled offline bundles of the newest version, since there is no need to use the newest version (0.94.X) on an offline computer, 0.93.X is just as good.
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
June 08, 2016, 04:16:56 PM |
|
Any reasonably new version of Armory can handle offline signing for any other reasonably new version of Armory.
What goatpig wrote was that he would not release precompiled offline bundles of the newest version, since there is no need to use the newest version (0.94.X) on an offline computer, 0.93.X is just as good.
That's what's confusing. What does offline bundle mean? There's never been an offline version. |
|
|
|
|
