1.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=135366.0Can you please rename or close this thread? It is definitely damaging Bitmits good reputation. Please remove at least the "warning" tag.
We will publish information about our company and future of Bitmit soon so dont worry!
I am assuming this quoted email was sent as a PM from tosaki to BTCGOLD?
"Bitmits good reputation" was already destroyed before this thread was opened. I would say the reputation was very much damaged when the message quoted here was posted:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119334.0A statement was needed as soon as bitmit.net was sold, giving full details of the sale. Or if it was never sold, a statement was needed as soon as people started expressing doubts clearly saying so. As a start, a statement is needed along the lines of: I am <person> from <address>, and I have owned bitmit since <date>, where I obtained it by <action>.
His attempts to delete/hide information posted here don't help his cause.
One of the most interesting features of bitmit is its escrow service. Unfortunately an escrow service is useless if people can't trust it. At the present time nobody can trust bitmit because nobody knows how owns it. How do we know he isn't related to the buyer? Or the seller? Any settlement involving disputes could be biased. Or he could disappear with the funds entirely.
In addition to the above, I think the information on the escrow service is lacking.
http://www.bitmit.net/en/info/13/bitmit-bitcoin-escrow-service . e.g. how are difficult disputes resolved (e.g. insufficient evidence to tell who is telling the truth)? One extremely well known not-bitcoin service has a reputation of ruling in favour of the buyer. What does bitmit do? This uncertainty, IMHO, also affects the credibility of bitmit.
