Satoshi Airdrops 1 Million BTC to the Poor

[BTCBinary]

that would be a great blow at this point. NOw that the topic of centralization is starting to haunt the community that would be the perfect decentralization act

[ricardobs]

This idea will fetch a good name to bitcoin ecosystem and community as it would hit media and gear up as an effective promotion. But finding poor or setting up criteria for deserved people are more challenging in the case of, Satoshi accepts this is a good idea.

[JosNekoKopa]

The satoshi bitcoins are out of the circulation now in a way, he/she is not active and the coins in these addresses are most likely out forever, also if they were given to people then the overall price will decrease "if you look at it like that"

I don't care for those coins if they are premine or not, one is certain someone have access to these addresses. Will he become a richest man on earth one day or he will airdrop his coins..Who can tell?

[LAMarcellus]

According to what one of the goals of bitcoin should be - decentralize also the wealth, do you think that's happening?

Maybe based on breaking some threashold by price, marked cap or account number ?

I'd do that :-)

Sometimes its best to remain quite and let others think you are an idiot, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.


Gambling addicts go to casinos, not Bitcoin forums. Ad campaign fail.

Everyone with an add campaign tag is now ignored. I will be making a special post asking other readers to do the same. This way all your  mental masturbation ad campaign garbage will be invisible and this public forum which you are abusing for private gain will actually be useful again. Right now its chock full of garbage can opinions from selfish ad campaigners with nothing good to say.

Really I think you could earn more washing dishes at a restaurant and actually, ya know, contribute to society.

[mtnsaa]

Well it is an intriguing idea. I for one don't think handing out money to people is a good thing to do. People in need as in charities that could work, but just "poor" people? for doing nothing? You can at least hire them to do something for Bitcoin if that was the case, something very easy and almost symbolic but something.

[vrm86]

Well it is an intriguing idea. I for one don't think handing out money to people is a good thing to do. People in need as in charities that could work, but just "poor" people? for doing nothing? You can at least hire them to do something for Bitcoin if that was the case, something very easy and almost symbolic but something.

Great idea - unemployment problems are caused mainly by insufficient private capital in the economy circulation. If some poor people would be asked to do some work for BTC they could gain also some experience. It also doesn't have to be 100% economically justified

[hv_]

Satoshi has unfortunatly disappeared from the circulation, so he won't be able to do so.

I see no reason why he might be back just for that particular reason (and also for fixing scalability) ....

Furhter he might have coded sth (some external wallet script) just to do automatically?

Seems I was pretty on spot here

Happy days


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJmePpSxImk

[DooMAD]

Satoshi has unfortunatly disappeared from the circulation, so he won't be able to do so.

I see no reason why he might be back just for that particular reason (and also for fixing scalability) ....

Seems I was pretty on spot here

In your fevered delusions, maybe.  None of the coins widely believed to be satoshi's will move.  The only bitcoins that have any chance of movement are the ones faketoshi made recently by selling his crappy forkcoin to a bunch of gullible halfwits like you.

[aoluain]

The idea of giving away bitcoin to mass to make the rich is the most dumbest I have ever heard.You will only devaluate bitcoin making it useless

and its not a sustainable venture.
what poor people need in the long term is education and employment opportunities.

A financial hand out will only be temporary, those people will only have to spend (if they can)
what they hypothetically get for essentials (or not), eventually they would end up in the
same position as they started.

How would Satoshi deem somebody poor?
or how would somebody have to prove they were poor?

[Olayinka2225]

Analysis shows that Satoshi might be hodling a very considerably less amount of bitcoin which might be at around 200k, so where is the 1m coming from, is he going to buy them of the market, from which exchange and with what wallet?

Moreso, I don't think Satoshi is still very much around us, he's vanished into the thin air.

[Nutrient]

The idea of Bitcoin has never been to be ‘free money’ or say, coupons. Would have been great if it was but then, it won’t be Bitcoin again. It just has to be earned. Through different ways.

[maria1110]

Fortune should be earned through hard work. Many people consider early holders of Bitcoin lucky, but they've also done a lot of research to make those decision.
Charity is one thing, but to give BTC directly away is another. Bitcoin is supposed to be about fair redistribution of wealth.

[DooMAD]

Bitcoin is supposed to be about fair redistribution of wealth freedom and fiscal autonomy.

FTFY.

There is nothing to support the notion that Bitcoin was ever intended to achieve equal distribution of wealth.  Many would argue you can't even do that without resorting to tyranny and Bitcoin certainly isn't about that. 

[TheGreatPython]

According to what one of the goals of bitcoin should be - decentralize also the wealth, do you think that's happening?

Maybe based on breaking some threashold by price, marked cap or account number ?

I'd do that :-)

So let us assume that Satoshi Nakamoto is still here in the forum, and talking with us, how exactly do you think he will be able to find out those who are poor among us? Seriously there are lots of people who would be disguising as poor just to receive the money from him. Unless he would maybe go out there into the world and start looking for the homeless people and giving them free Bitcoin, and that would be it.

But, if you are just going to say dropping millions of Bitcoin online, most of the poor people we have today are not even online. If you are able to buy Internet access, then I guess you’re at least living fine to an extent. But your idea is still a good idea, and it’s not bad if he should decide that he’s going to do it.

[hv_]

According to what one of the goals of bitcoin should be - decentralize also the wealth, do you think that's happening?

Maybe based on breaking some threashold by price, marked cap or account number ?

I'd do that :-)

So let us assume that Satoshi Nakamoto is still here in the forum, and talking with us, how exactly do you think he will be able to find out those who are poor among us? Seriously there are lots of people who would be disguising as poor just to receive the money from him. Unless he would maybe go out there into the world and start looking for the homeless people and giving them free Bitcoin, and that would be it.

But, if you are just going to say dropping millions of Bitcoin online, most of the poor people we have today are not even online. If you are able to buy Internet access, then I guess you’re at least living fine to an extent. But your idea is still a good idea, and it’s not bad if he should decide that he’s going to do it.

Satoshi is active only one a Slack, confirmed no airdrop. Watch out, I wonder if Centbee will play a role