|
February 08, 2016, 07:25:36 AM |
|
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good arch GetNextTargetRequiredV2 Most similar arch, diff=4, codehash=639fa24760ed58774619; Manually inspected, Good GetNextTargetRequiredV1 Most similar arch, diff=1, codehash=9df2943f5c65a6780b0f; Manually inspected, Good ProcessMessage Most similar shrmcoin, diff=18, codehash=0733405866c5b2a95f88; Manually inspected, Good CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar arch, diff=2, codehash=7cf1a3b12897da3728c1; Manually inspected, Good AcceptToMemoryPool Most similar arch, diff=46, codehash=d850939e63cf63e48330; Manually inspected, Good SendMessages Good shrmcoin CheckProofOfWork Good arch GetNextTargetRequired Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=9a948d1864ac06c83c3f; Manually inspected, Good CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=5, codehash=edc2e935cdbc84a44273; Manually inspected, Good CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin GetTransaction Good blackcoin arch ComputeMinStake Good arch CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch ProcessBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=14, codehash=fe2eafe6295d4fa4f73b; Manually inspected, Good CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch ComputeMinWork Good arch CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good arch CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin Not found funcs ['GetProofOfStakeLimit'] GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info? As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed. Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
The only one thing i didn't get is how you calculated totalsupply? 150000*50+212121 = 7,712,121
|