 |
February 08, 2016, 07:25:36 AM |
|
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good arch
GetNextTargetRequiredV2 Most similar arch, diff=4, codehash=639fa24760ed58774619; Manually inspected, Good
GetNextTargetRequiredV1 Most similar arch, diff=1, codehash=9df2943f5c65a6780b0f; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Most similar shrmcoin, diff=18, codehash=0733405866c5b2a95f88; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar arch, diff=2, codehash=7cf1a3b12897da3728c1; Manually inspected, Good
AcceptToMemoryPool Most similar arch, diff=46, codehash=d850939e63cf63e48330; Manually inspected, Good
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=9a948d1864ac06c83c3f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=5, codehash=edc2e935cdbc84a44273; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=14, codehash=fe2eafe6295d4fa4f73b; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good arch
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
The only one thing i didn't get is how you calculated totalsupply? 150000*50+212121 = 7,712,121
|
