Making $6000 by owning 100 bitcointalk accounts

[criptix]

calculation is wrong but method is correct and people are doing it en mass here.

long live the sig spam

[unholycactus]

Even if there was no limit on how much activity you can gain per week, your accounts would have trouble finding/staying in a sig campaign because of your post quality.
Not to mention you would probably get banned before reaching a rank that's profitable.

[Redrose]

I'm sorry for you but your maths are flawded. You would not be able to register 100 accounts in the same campaign. The only place where you could do it would be YoBit, but the pay would be a lot less !

[Lauda]

Seems like people are actually giving this some thoughts. Keep in mind that once we catch you doing something like this you will be banned permanently.

There isn't 100 spots open for people to join.  You would have to buy all these accounts and you'd lose money on each 1 daily as the prices trend down over time.  You dont have longevity with this idea and the work is robotic.  Better things to do with your life.

Regardless of the work being robotic or not, if the amount stated in OP is achievable then that is a lot of money especially if you live in some third world country. You'd be the local rich guy within a year.

[pinoycash]

i cant even manage 1 account and cant reach the 20post qouta for the day, you must be good at spamming to make hundreds of post on many accounts

[Dracov]

so... why arent you a hero member yet?

[Decoded]

That's if you can make 100 posts on every single one of those 100 accounts

Good luck with that, mate. You've also forgotten that there's an activity cap of +14 a fortnight.

[yellowcat1771]

That's if you can make 100 posts on every single one of those 100 accounts

Good luck with that, mate. You've also forgotten that there's an activity cap of +14 a fortnight.

Okay so 240 days of posting 100 posts on 100 acconts would still equate to $1500 a week in 8.5 months roughly

[teddy5145]

That's if you can make 100 posts on every single one of those 100 accounts

Good luck with that, mate. You've also forgotten that there's an activity cap of +14 a fortnight.

Okay so 240 days of posting 100 posts on 100 acconts would still equate to $1500 a week in 8.5 months roughly

Then having the account banned or tagged as a scammer
And having red trust will plummet the price of it to maybe $3
Just face it, your technique will not work and it's a waste of time

[nichu]

it would be damn awesome if i could half of the said amount  , your calculation is picture perfect in a normal sense, but if u take the reality of things and how this forum would calculate the activity ,your calculation will derail just like that  . if you could spend much time on how the activity work rather than doing the math without a constraint it would have being less of a pain 

[shorena]

That's if you can make 100 posts on every single one of those 100 accounts

Good luck with that, mate. You've also forgotten that there's an activity cap of +14 a fortnight.

Okay so 240 days of posting 100 posts on 100 acconts would still equate to $1500 a week in 8.5 months roughly

No, 10000 posts a day are still 7 posts per minute if you dont sleep. You will not have enough material to keep them constructive and get banned.

[007eminem]

Ideal is very plentiful, reality is bone feeling.

[notlist3d]

That's if you can make 100 posts on every single one of those 100 accounts

Good luck with that, mate. You've also forgotten that there's an activity cap of +14 a fortnight.

Okay so 240 days of posting 100 posts on 100 acconts would still equate to $1500 a week in 8.5 months roughly

No, 10000 posts a day are still 7 posts per minute if you dont sleep. You will not have enough material to keep them constructive and get banned.

My math says there are around 10080 minutes per week.  So you would have to have good post's that are constructive within a minute..... easier then it sounds on most constructive posts.  And you could never sleep.

Still though you find me someone who can find even 1/2 of that with key word being "constructive posts" I would be surprised.   Even 1/10th of amount you mention you would have to push hard. 1000 a week.... maybe possible but your talking about more time then I can imagine to make constructive posts.  I think it more likely would be in the hundreds for constructive. 

But someone might be able to surprise me.  I just don't see 1000 a week happening being realistic.

[Jasmint]

Regardless of the work being robotic or not, if the amount stated in OP is achievable then that is a lot of money especially if you live in some third world country. You'd be the local rich guy within a year.

But in a third world country, people cannot spend their bitcoin easily. They can spend it in 20 years when bitcon becomes popular there.

[Amph]

you also stated another thing wrong, signature campaign can actually deliver $120 per monht, and not $15 per week which is only half of it

and in the past was nearly $500 per month

[southafricadude]

People would get mad with your volume of posts though, spam is not good

[sase007]

You are forgetting one thing: u can get maximal 14 activity points every 2 weeks, so you are not able to create those sr members within 5,71 hours, it would take more then a year...

This is wrong too!
To get an activity of 240 points, it would take about 224 days (14 activity for 14 days).
However, if timing is in your favour, 240 points could take

Code:

240-(13x2)=240-26=214

Also, when purchasing accounts, you must make sure that the posts are up to scratch - otherwise you will not get accepted to signature campaigns and saying "sorry, mr manager, I recently bought this account" would definitely award you with lots of negative rep, rendering that account useless and worthless.

[buddycool]

100 bitcoin accoumts would be too much... Managing a single account is difficult,  how would you manage 100... And off course it will be spamming and you may be tracked  I guess...

[sase007]

But I think manage 100 bitcointalk accounts its not easy, you must have many vpn or different proxy and opened one by one.

And not so easy to look for a signature campaign to 100 accounts.

I heard that TOR can hide IPs.
It is technically not against rules to own more than one account, but is frowned upon.
But, 100 spamming accounts will definitely get noticed, I think that more than 1 account would force people to notice that two people post similar.

[gkv9]

Owning more than 1 account here is legal, but mostly alts get caught and so, there isn't a possibility for anyone out here to cheat the system managers have applied, and that is, checking users' posts before approving them to join...