kiwiasian (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2011, 02:19:12 PM |
|
Please show me a screenshot of this page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
theBaba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 03:05:38 PM |
|
Can't grab a screenshot right now, but I use "-v -w128 -f15"
My 6970 is clocked at 940MHz and in the Overdrive control panel I set power to +6%
With these settings I get 398-402 Mhash/s.
Without the +6% power, '-v' causes a performance decrease.
|
|
|
|
Sukrim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006
|
|
June 08, 2011, 03:22:47 PM |
|
Is there a reason you don't use BFI_INT?
|
|
|
|
kiwiasian (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2011, 03:27:43 PM |
|
Can't grab a screenshot right now, but I use "-v -w128 -f15"
My 6970 is clocked at 940MHz and in the Overdrive control panel I set power to +6%
With these settings I get 398-402 Mhash/s.
Without the +6% power, '-v' causes a performance decrease.
What does it says next to "Device"?
|
|
|
|
kiwiasian (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2011, 03:28:02 PM |
|
Is there a reason you don't use BFI_INT?
I thought it was directly integrated into the program? Edit: how do I use it?
|
|
|
|
Genrobo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 03:37:17 PM |
|
what kind of performance increase does BFI_INT really give?
|
|
|
|
kiwiasian (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2011, 05:42:11 PM |
|
what kind of performance increase does BFI_INT really give?
Also interested in knowing this...as far as I know I think it's just an optimization to improve performance on AMD cards.
|
|
|
|
rgod14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 05:51:24 PM |
|
I used GUIMiner for quite awhile and decided to give Phoenix a try a couple days ago. I just recently posted it into https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison . I am able to get 423 mh/s. Stales are a little higher but not too much more. Here are the settings I used if you're interested. ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case One other thing to note. I can surf around on my pc and the hashing never drops below 410. With GUIMiner if I added -f0 I could get about 415 max and the pc was unusable. Don't mean to hijack just figured I'd let you know. Also, it's a Sapphire 2GB card in case that makes a difference.
|
|
|
|
kiwiasian (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2011, 06:02:28 PM |
|
I used GUIMiner for quite awhile and decided to give Phoenix a try a couple days ago. I just recently posted it into https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison . I am able to get 423 mh/s. Stales are a little higher but not too much more. Here are the settings I used if you're interested. ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case One other thing to note. I can surf around on my pc and the hashing never drops below 410. With GUIMiner if I added -f0 I could get about 415 max and the pc was unusable. Don't mean to hijack just figured I'd let you know. Also, it's a Sapphire 2GB card in case that makes a difference. Can you just post a screenshot? Your GPU doesn't need to be mining, I just need a screenshot.
|
|
|
|
gogusrl
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 06:11:58 PM |
|
You forgot to mention the most important part : the voltage of your GPU.
|
|
|
|
bcpokey
|
|
June 08, 2011, 06:17:53 PM |
|
If you're wondering if your device should be labelled as Cypress, no, it should not. 69xx series are part of the Northern Islands architecture, I believe 6970s are caymans.
If you're wondering about device #, that varies by computer, device 0 happens often, sometimes device 1 happens.
You don't really need to ask in such a cryptic way.
|
|
|
|
kiwiasian (OP)
|
|
June 08, 2011, 10:09:24 PM |
|
If you're wondering if your device should be labelled as Cypress, no, it should not. 69xx series are part of the Northern Islands architecture, I believe 6970s are caymans.
If you're wondering about device #, that varies by computer, device 0 happens often, sometimes device 1 happens.
You don't really need to ask in such a cryptic way.
So it should be something along the lines of: Device:
|
|
|
|
|