Negative user in default trust 1

[Th3BlackBeard]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

His trust feedback shows: Trust:    : ??-1 / +15

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

[--Encrypted--]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

[Th3BlackBeard]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

His trust show red to general users now. Is he one of thermos cronies? And not one explanation by admins who put him on dt trust.

[--Encrypted--]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

His trust show red to general users now. Is he one of thermos cronies?

only the overall rating, it's still 1 negative and 15 positive (and it's orange). ask therm-- err theymos.

[Th3BlackBeard]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

His trust show red to general users now. Is he one of thermos cronies?

only the overall rating, it's still 1 negative and 15 positive (and it's orange). ask therm-- err theymos.

Default trust should be viewed as role model with no trusted red feedback on their profile.

[shorena]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

His trust show red to general users now. Is he one of thermos cronies?

only the overall rating, it's still 1 negative and 15 positive (and it's orange). ask therm-- err theymos.

Default trust should be viewed as role model with no trusted red feedback on their profile.

Read the other thread, if you have anything to add, do so there. It makes no sense to start this all over again.

[redsn0w]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

His trust show red to general users now. Is he one of thermos cronies?

only the overall rating, it's still 1 negative and 15 positive (and it's orange). ask therm-- err theymos.

Default trust should be viewed as role model with no trusted red feedback on their profile.

Not at all , default trust is only a suggestion... you should build and maintain your trust list.

[Th3BlackBeard]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

His trust show red to general users now. Is he one of thermos cronies?

only the overall rating, it's still 1 negative and 15 positive (and it's orange). ask therm-- err theymos.

Default trust should be viewed as role model with no trusted red feedback on their profile.

Not at all , default trust is only a suggestion... you should build and maintain your trust list.

It is not a suggestion, It was force to all users to believe them they are trusted.

[mexxer-2]

It is not a suggestion, It was force to all users to believe them they are trusted.

Lol no, its on your ignorance if you don't find adding only the people you trust on your trust list, waste of your precious time

[redsn0w]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

His trust show red to general users now. Is he one of thermos cronies?

only the overall rating, it's still 1 negative and 15 positive (and it's orange). ask therm-- err theymos.

Default trust should be viewed as role model with no trusted red feedback on their profile.

Not at all , default trust is only a suggestion... you should build and maintain your trust list.

It is not a suggestion, It was force to all users to believe them they are trusted.

Nah, this is why the trust system doesn't work....  you should not believe that all the users that are in the default trust are trustworthy.

[koelen3]

The fuck is happening with the DT 1 people around here..


And who have Escrow.ms still in there trust list? i can see him in DT 2

[--Encrypted--]

The fuck is happening with the DT 1 people around here..


And who have Escrow.ms still in there trust list? i can see him in DT 2

tomatocage and badbear still have escrow.ms in their trust list. both are not very active these days. badbear did log in just few hours ago though. but I don't think he noticed.

[Decoded]

He is not fully untrustworthy, and he has contributed hugely to the bitcoin community, so why not keep him trusted? One negative rep from BayAreaCoins because he gave him inside information doesn't mean anything, because BAC also gave him a positive rep (according to my memory)

[Mark Frappeles]

The fuck is happening with the DT 1 people around here..


And who have Escrow.ms still in there trust list? i can see him in DT 2

tomatocage and badbear still have escrow.ms in their trust list. both are not very active these days. badbear did log in just few hours ago though. but I don't think he noticed.

where can you see who has who in their trust lists?

[Lutpin]

where can you see who has who in their trust lists?

Go to your trust settings, scroll down, select "hierarchial view"
You will see the users grouped to the respective lists they are in.

[tspacepilot]

It does not make sense at all.
He should be remove from default trust or the red feedback should be removed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3420

there's a thread about this here. maybe you'll find your answers there (didn't read it).

His trust show red to general users now. Is he one of thermos cronies?

only the overall rating, it's still 1 negative and 15 positive (and it's orange). ask therm-- err theymos.

It's not clear to me if this newbie account is just one of the typical people who trolls dooglus and is trying to get more attention or if the person is merely ignorant.  In any case, there's just no such thing as "an overall rating".  Everyone's rating is different for each person, you can be red/green/orange, it just depends on what you want in your trust list.

Default trust should be viewed as role model with no trusted red feedback on their profile.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I'm thinking of taking the extreme skeptical approach and taking everyone, including DT, off my trust list.  That way no one will have green or red trust under their avatar and I can evaluate each person individually without any bias up front.  Or does that sound completely retarded?

[qwk]

I'm thinking of taking the extreme skeptical approach and taking everyone, including DT, off my trust list.  That way no one will have green or red trust under their avatar and I can evaluate each person individually without any bias up front.  Or does that sound completely retarded?

Sounds reasonable enough.
The trust system is a "shortcut" to evaluate people.
If you can and are willing to do your own due diligence, go ahead.
You'll be much less likely to be mislead by others' people's opinions.

[TECSHARE]

I'm thinking of taking the extreme skeptical approach and taking everyone, including DT, off my trust list.  That way no one will have green or red trust under their avatar and I can evaluate each person individually without any bias up front.  Or does that sound completely retarded?

Sounds reasonable enough.
The trust system is a "shortcut" to evaluate people.
If you can and are willing to do your own due diligence, go ahead.
You'll be much less likely to be mislead by others' people's opinions.

So instead of forcing noobs to do their own due diligence we are potentially misleading them using a flawed trust system, convincing them to participate in transactions they might not otherwise take part in without the trust system telling theme these people are reputable when they are not? When are you people going to admit this top down trust system is worse than having none at all? I fear this day will come shortly after no one comes here any longer anyway because the forum is infested with fraud from the top down.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I removed everyone from my trust list including DT.  Not going to add anyone to it but I'll still leave feedback for people I do deals with or scammers and so forth.