New web Wallet Staking system JustStake.Online IS CLOSING DOWN

[pjcltd]

1337 Coin have asked us to list there coin and have offered us a few coins to hand out to the testers  
so now is a good time to get an account sorted out and get some coins on the system.

I'll let you know when and what we get as soon as I can

thanks
Paul

[DrNoob]

Well at least theres going to be standards, how will coins be judged? just on userbase?

[pjcltd]

Well at least theres going to be standards, how will coins be judged? just on userbase?

not just that
active Dev
active markets 
good code base etc
things like that 


thanks
Paul

[Velvet78]

1337 Coin have asked us to list there coin and have offered us a few coins to hand out to the testers  
so now is a good time to get an account sorted out and get some coins on the system.

I'll let you know when and what we get as soon as I can

thanks
Paul

Very pleased to see that

Ive sent 250k 1337 to Paul which he will distribute amongst the testers. Happy Staking and enjoy the generous POS rewards of 1337!

More about 1337 can be found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1319833.0

[NextGenCrypto]

Quick suggestion:  Remove coins with 0 balances from "My Balances" page and provide functionality for users to obtain deposit addresses on the "My Deposits" page.  This would achieve a cleaner "dashboard" of sorts for users and put all deposit information on a single page.  

Really like the service, just let our users know about it in Slack.   

[DrNoob]

Quick suggestion:  Remove coins with 0 balances from "My Balances" page and provide functionality for users to obtain deposit addresses on the "My Deposits" page.  This would achieve a cleaner "dashboard" of sorts for users and put all deposit information on a single page.  

Really like the service, just let our users know about it in Slack.   

Looks like you got your wish, i wondered what the error page was about, now i know why haha..

[NextGenCrypto]

Quick suggestion:  Remove coins with 0 balances from "My Balances" page and provide functionality for users to obtain deposit addresses on the "My Deposits" page.  This would achieve a cleaner "dashboard" of sorts for users and put all deposit information on a single page.  

Really like the service, just let our users know about it in Slack.   

Looks like you got your wish, i wondered what the error page was about, now i know why haha..

Nice!  UI isn't too important in a site like this since people won't be browsing for long periods, but the easier the better!

[DrNoob]

Quick suggestion:  Remove coins with 0 balances from "My Balances" page and provide functionality for users to obtain deposit addresses on the "My Deposits" page.  This would achieve a cleaner "dashboard" of sorts for users and put all deposit information on a single page.  

Really like the service, just let our users know about it in Slack.   

Looks like you got your wish, i wondered what the error page was about, now i know why haha..

Nice!  UI isn't too important in a site like this since people won't be browsing for long periods, but the easier the better!

Agreed a site like this is fundamentally boring, what do you do, deposit coins and wait... Always nice to have a clean interface over one that offers information overload. Nice to see the changes are applyed so fast aswell

[Maicol792]

good service and good idea congratulation

[incognitoworker]

Interesting, XQN is watching your service.
We would also like to be represented with you, as we already are on most or all other cloud platforms
HOW can you afford these prices?
Since we are running a similar, but more individual option your  pricing model is similar to our Enterprise option, i do not understand how you can turn a profit on this.
Do you plan to run with negative income in the startup time, and calculate your fees after a "grace" period?

Anyhow, nice addition to the cloud staking eviroment, staking is a BIG and growing buisiniss.

IW

[DrNoob]

Interesting, XQN is watching your service.
We would also like to be represented with you, as we already are on most or all other cloud platforms
HOW can you afford these prices?
Since we are running a similar, but more individual option your  pricing model is similar to our Enterprise option, i do not understand how you can turn a profit on this.
Do you plan to run with negative income in the startup time, and calculate your fees after a "grace" period?

Anyhow, nice addition to the cloud staking eviroment, staking is a BIG and growing buisiniss.

IW

Join the que we all want to know how if they can really hit that pricing target, but if they can, and it all works i think thats a good thing, finally what you would call a benchmark, because they will just blow the comptition out of the water at 0.10 per coin per year i think he said was the target

[pjcltd]

Hi guys
Ok then
We know what we would like to charge for this service lol

But

What would you pay?

Don't think it going to be per coin but as a total service with every user having access to every coin
So what's your thoughts ?

$25 $45 $55 per year?
Or your thoughts

[DrNoob]

We talking monthly?

[pjcltd]

We talking monthly?

We can do it like that but I think yearly is better

[incognitoworker]

We talking monthly?

We can do it like that but I think yearly is better

My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW

[DrNoob]

We talking monthly?

We can do it like that but I think yearly is better

My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW

I think you havnt been reading the posts on here or the little information on there site, there objective is to drive down the cost we pay to stake down our coins, if they can do it for less energy than we consume, were fundamentally better off regardless of a stakes "proffitability" driving down costs can go along way into driving up profitability.

price wise, i calculated my computer costs me about $65 a year in electric, remaining on almost 24/7 for staking, id prolly be willing to pay half that and switch my computer of for 18hours a day....... gonna be each to there own i guess, how much are there investments worth and can they justify the cost, well if yoru computers on 24/7 i can justify it. Its called a no brainer.

[Patrice7]

Hi guys
Ok then
We know what we would like to charge for this service lol

But

What would you pay?

Don't think it going to be per coin but as a total service with every user having access to every coin
So what's your thoughts ?

$25 $45 $55 per year?
Or your thoughts

I'd prefer to pay a percentage of my stake. Personally I'd have a tiered percentage... the more coins a person stakes the less percentage charged. You'd attract more people that are new to crypto or just new to stake coins even if your entry percentage was a bit high. People with a lot of coins would stick around for the convenience of not having to deal with multiple wallets and the electricity costs.

[incognitoworker]

We talking monthly?

We can do it like that but I think yearly is better

My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW

I think you havnt been reading the posts on here or the little information on there site, there objective is to drive down the cost we pay to stake down our coins, if they can do it for less energy than we consume, were fundamentally better off regardless of a stakes "proffitability" driving down costs can go along way into driving up profitability.

price wise, i calculated my computer costs me about $65 a year in electric, remaining on almost 24/7 for staking, id prolly be willing to pay half that and switch my computer of for 18hours a day....... gonna be each to there own i guess, how much are there investments worth and can they justify the cost, well if yoru computers on 24/7 i can justify it. Its called a no brainer.

I did read everything here and on their page, and also about their masternode services and exchange.
I think it is you that did not understand what i was writing.

I like how they want to push down the price for the end user, keep going that route.

IW

[incognitoworker]

Hi guys
Ok then
We know what we would like to charge for this service lol

But

What would you pay?

Don't think it going to be per coin but as a total service with every user having access to every coin
So what's your thoughts ?

$25 $45 $55 per year?
Or your thoughts

I'd prefer to pay a percentage of my stake. Personally I'd have a tiered percentage... the more coins a person stakes the less percentage charged. You'd attract more people that are new to crypto or just new to stake coins even if your entry percentage was a bit high. People with a lot of coins would stick around for the convenience of not having to deal with multiple wallets and the electricity costs.

This is exactly how our team did our pricing, but we are not a pos POOL, but an individual service based on each clients need.

IW

[Patrice7]

We talking monthly?

We can do it like that but I think yearly is better

My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW

I think you havnt been reading the posts on here or the little information on there site, there objective is to drive down the cost we pay to stake down our coins, if they can do it for less energy than we consume, were fundamentally better off regardless of a stakes "proffitability" driving down costs can go along way into driving up profitability.

price wise, i calculated my computer costs me about $65 a year in electric, remaining on almost 24/7 for staking, id prolly be willing to pay half that and switch my computer of for 18hours a day....... gonna be each to there own i guess, how much are there investments worth and can they justify the cost, well if yoru computers on 24/7 i can justify it. Its called a no brainer.

I did read everything here and on their page, and also about their masternode services and exchange.
I think it is you that did not understand what i was writing.

I like how they want to push down the price for the end user, keep going that route.

IW

I think I get what you are saying. Have 2 options.  A percentage charge for people staking a small amount of coins and a monthly/yearly option for those that are comfortable with it and will have a lot of coins to stake?  I like that idea.