Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 02:29:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Reputation System and The Corresponding Abuse  (Read 1254 times)
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
February 17, 2016, 04:07:01 PM
 #21

Oh yeh - just recalled why my feedback was negative...

Quote
KWH 70: -0 / +7   2015-11-19   0.00000000   Reference   Knowingly giving a Rep. Loan. You basically sold your feedback for dust. Congratulations.
Is that your negative feedback?
I think that is KWH's feedback, and I have to deal with KWH alone to work that out.


If you removed your feedbacks on the both of my accounts, which shouldn't be there, I would remove my trust that I placed there.

I've highlighted the word why - the why being that KWH left you negative trust.

You can go first on removing your negative trust like you did for the others.

1715394584
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715394584

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715394584
Reply with quote  #2

1715394584
Report to moderator
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715394584
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715394584

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715394584
Reply with quote  #2

1715394584
Report to moderator
xavTrot6 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2016, 04:09:52 PM
 #22

Oh yeh - just recalled why my feedback was negative...

Quote
KWH 70: -0 / +7   2015-11-19   0.00000000   Reference   Knowingly giving a Rep. Loan. You basically sold your feedback for dust. Congratulations.
Is that your negative feedback?
I think that is KWH's feedback, and I have to deal with KWH alone to work that out.


If you removed your feedbacks on the both of my accounts, which shouldn't be there, I would remove my trust that I placed there.

I've highlighted the word why - the why being that KWH left you negative trust.

You can go first on removing your negative trust like you did for the others.
It's different.
You are untrusted, you are doing this based off something you are not involved in, and you are giving another repetitive feedback off the ones already there.
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
February 17, 2016, 04:12:38 PM
 #23

Oh yeh - just recalled why my feedback was negative...

Quote
KWH 70: -0 / +7   2015-11-19   0.00000000   Reference   Knowingly giving a Rep. Loan. You basically sold your feedback for dust. Congratulations.
Is that your negative feedback?
I think that is KWH's feedback, and I have to deal with KWH alone to work that out.


If you removed your feedbacks on the both of my accounts, which shouldn't be there, I would remove my trust that I placed there.

I've highlighted the word why - the why being that KWH left you negative trust.

You can go first on removing your negative trust like you did for the others.
It's different.
You are untrusted, you are doing this based off something you are not involved in, and you are giving another repetitive feedback off the ones already there.

And in the time you took to write that, as an act of good faith on my part, I have changed the trust to neutral. So, it is you who are refusing to remove negative trust.

Oh dear.

xavTrot6 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2016, 04:13:44 PM
 #24

Oh yeh - just recalled why my feedback was negative...

Quote
KWH 70: -0 / +7   2015-11-19   0.00000000   Reference   Knowingly giving a Rep. Loan. You basically sold your feedback for dust. Congratulations.
Is that your negative feedback?
I think that is KWH's feedback, and I have to deal with KWH alone to work that out.


If you removed your feedbacks on the both of my accounts, which shouldn't be there, I would remove my trust that I placed there.

I've highlighted the word why - the why being that KWH left you negative trust.

You can go first on removing your negative trust like you did for the others.
It's different.
You are untrusted, you are doing this based off something you are not involved in, and you are giving another repetitive feedback off the ones already there.

And in the time you took to write that, as an act of good faith on my part, I have changed the trust to neutral. So, it is you who are refusing to remove negative trust.

Oh dear.
I will remove it now.
You need to not act like that.
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 2218


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
February 17, 2016, 04:18:14 PM
 #25


I will remove it now.
You need to not act like that.

In fact seeing as you brought up the subject, the information I posted was researched by myself.

As to giving negative trust for Alt's there is a discussion in other threads about only giving out (negative) for those who have negative from DT (which you do) hence the red paint.

Perhaps you should lock this thread now?

xavTrot6 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 17, 2016, 04:22:25 PM
 #26


I will remove it now.
You need to not act like that.

In fact seeing as you brought up the subject, the information I posted was researched by myself.

As to giving negative trust for Alt's there is a discussion in other threads about only giving out (negative) for those who have negative from DT (which you do) hence the red paint.

Perhaps you should lock this thread now?

It wasn't researched, you just looked at my trust feedbacks.

LOCKED.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!