Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 06:08:21 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitfury Designs released under CC-BY-SA  (Read 4453 times)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7827


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2016, 01:10:16 PM
 #21

Fair point on Cheap hyrdo power in China eg the 3 Gorges Dam but frankly, that vast majority of overall power production production is spoken for. For most heavily industrialized countries, for just one segment - aluminum production - takes one helluva chunk. ref: http://wordpress.mrreid.org/2011/07/15/electricity-consumption-in-the-production-of-aluminium/
"According to Alcoa, the world’s largest producer of aluminium, the best smelters use about 13 kilowatt hours (46.8 megajoules) of electrical energy to produce one kilogram of aluminium; the worldwide average is closer to 15 kWh/kg (54 MJ/kg).

Worldwide production of aluminium in 2010 was 41.4 million tonnes. Using the figures above this means that 621 billion kilowatt hours of electrical energy were used in the production of aluminium. To put that in perspective, the total world production of electrical energy was 20261 billion kilowatt hours, meaning that more than 3% of the world’s entire electrical supply went to extraction of aluminium."

Toss in the other more pressing power needs of China and you get my point.

Ja certainly a lot of low cost power will be available to local (ish) peta-farms but not as much as you think. Outside of being right next to the power plant/dam (the now closed Alcoa smelter site in Washington state comes to mind) the infra over there just does not support someone suddenly deciding to run 25-50MW much less 100MW or more without a helluva lotta prep and time/cash for it to be done.

yes but we had  2 months of huge see-saw hash rates. In Nov and in Dec.

Seems to me  China (bitmaintech) has been setting up this flood the network work idea for quite some time.

They only need 5 months or so of cheap power to do what I am saying.

Maintain a 15 to 20% growth rate until the ½ ing

 They do not need 1x  100 mega watt deal from 1 dam

3x 40 mega watt deals do the trick.  Or 4x 35 mega watt deals.

Remember China has been having an industrial  slump and some of these plants may have excess power.

I picked the biggest dam  because what is 100-150 megawatts compared to 22,500 megawatts

less then 1 percent.  Basically if this is the  tactic being  employed.

 1 cent power with .3 watt machines

A bitfury  owner need 3 cent power with .1 watt machines

both costing the same per th to be on equal ground.

And the bitfury may not be ready until april 1st (hmmm is that a joke)

by april first diff will be 293 -300 and a 10th 1000 watt machine would only be earning 4 usd a day with 10 cent power
and 5.20 usd a day with 5 cent power

And the ½ ing would be 5 diff jumps away.

Of course maybe my FUD about the diff is wrong and after this jump to 170 we go flat

Or back to more normal jumps of 3 to 6 %





Ps thank you for the led light bulb design much better then cfl's

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
1714716501
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714716501

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714716501
Reply with quote  #2

1714716501
Report to moderator
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714716501
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714716501

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714716501
Reply with quote  #2

1714716501
Report to moderator
volosator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 272
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 11, 2016, 06:15:06 PM
 #22

Great contribution to the community! Thanks!

I was hoping for chip design actually when I saw the thread  Smiley
tvasbn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 460
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 19, 2016, 06:05:52 AM
 #23

48V will be a plus, much smaller section needed for PCI cables.
Does Bitfury try cooling those whit transformer oil? not two phase, only transformer oil cooled whit a radiator.
? Punin 
tvasbn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 460
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 19, 2016, 06:11:44 AM
 #24

The hashing boards are powered from MbLiquid-9_v1?
tvasbn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 460
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 19, 2016, 06:16:19 AM
 #25

189 chips/board x 25Gh(BF 28nm - 32GH)= 4725 Gh/s / board at 0.2 its 1kw/board, is that correct?
tvasbn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 460
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 19, 2016, 06:23:57 AM
 #26

189 chips/board x 25Gh(BF 28nm - 32GH)= 4725 Gh/s / board at 0.2 its 1kw/board, is that correct?

i just saw their spec 1700 hash chips = 20TH/s so 11 Gh/chip 2200Gh/s /bord - 450W
KNK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 692
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 19, 2016, 08:58:27 AM
 #27

StringPowerBlock.pdf is probably the most interesting one. This is a block of one 250nm communicator chip and seven 28nm chips. Here you can see how the individual blocks are interconnected (differential pairs), hashing chip connections and how the StringPower design that BitFury pioneered with our first 55nm chip works.

Is the chip named Bitfury_POWER in StringPowerBlock.pdf the one that is on the boards (on 1block_short.jpg BF250K3N48), because the pin-out is different - 40 vs 56 pins
If it is the same "250nm communicator chip" but different revisions or the bigger one is just for more chips, which of them is the latest revision and for how many chips?

Mega Crypto Polis - www.MegaCryptoPolis.com
BTC tips: 1KNK1akhpethhtcyhKTF2d3PWTQDUWUzHE
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
February 19, 2016, 10:28:09 PM
 #28

BitfFury is deeply committed to a decentralized Bitcoin Blockchain ecosystem and we want to do all we can to ensure that as many hobbyists and engineers as possible have access to the technology we have developed with the support we've had from the Bitcoin community. Therefore we have decided to release our 28nm designs under Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 License to give you the opportunity to get familiar with the style of our latest designs.[/size]

I am sorry, but I find this move to be FULL OF SHIT.

You are releasing your 28nm designs when you already have a 16nm chip out in the wild. Economically this is useless. If you wanted a decentralized Bitcoin Blockchain you would've release this last year, not now.

PLEASE STOP LYING ABOUT YOUR DECENTRALIZATION EFFORTS.

I do applaud Bitfury for making a presence on the forum, I hope it is because they are truly committed to us "little guys". 

Really? Are you for real? Nobody will buy these chips when they are less than 1 month away from mass deploying their new 16nm chip that needs less than 0.1W/GH. Please stop with your shilling!

2112
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1065



View Profile
February 19, 2016, 10:43:31 PM
 #29

Really? Are you for real? Nobody will buy these chips when they are less than 1 month away from mass deploying their new 16nm chip that needs less than 0.1W/GH. Please stop with your shilling!
Dude, stop being so naïve. Brownnosing to chip vendors is nowadays the only marketable skill for non-technical people. Bitcoinorama is now back posting, go reread his story. Maybe he finally got paid by KnC?

Shill is actually a highly honorable occupation centered around getting paid by the vendor.


Please comment, critique, criticize or ridicule BIP 2112: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54382.0
Long-term mining prognosis: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91101.0
Unacceptable
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 19, 2016, 11:34:23 PM
 #30

BitfFury is deeply committed to a decentralized Bitcoin Blockchain ecosystem and we want to do all we can to ensure that as many hobbyists and engineers as possible have access to the technology we have developed with the support we've had from the Bitcoin community. Therefore we have decided to release our 28nm designs under Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 License to give you the opportunity to get familiar with the style of our latest designs.[/size]

I am sorry, but I find this move to be FULL OF SHIT.

You are releasing your 28nm designs when you already have a 16nm chip out in the wild. Economically this is useless. If you wanted a decentralized Bitcoin Blockchain you would've release this last year, not now.

PLEASE STOP LYING ABOUT YOUR DECENTRALIZATION EFFORTS.

I do applaud Bitfury for making a presence on the forum, I hope it is because they are truly committed to us "little guys". 

Really? Are you for real? Nobody will buy these chips when they are less than 1 month away from mass deploying their new 16nm chip that needs less than 0.1W/GH. Please stop with your shilling!

+1000 for this  Cool 

Now they want give their gift to the world,because they care sooooo much  Roll Eyes Sure...............

"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole."  -Raylan Givens
Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be
"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan Smiley
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
February 20, 2016, 12:18:48 AM
 #31

Really? Are you for real? Nobody will buy these chips when they are less than 1 month away from mass deploying their new 16nm chip that needs less than 0.1W/GH. Please stop with your shilling!
Dude, stop being so naïve. Brownnosing to chip vendors is nowadays the only marketable skill for non-technical people. Bitcoinorama is now back posting, go reread his story. Maybe he finally got paid by KnC?

Shill is actually a highly honorable occupation centered around getting paid by the vendor.

And getting paid by miners like me. I've thrown a big fat tip towards him for his view on KnC when they were accepting pre-orders for 1st gen Jupiters once it was proven that he was right. It seems that I scared him and he stopped posting now Smiley

kilo17
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1001

aka "whocares"


View Profile
February 20, 2016, 06:39:43 AM
 #32


I do applaud Bitfury for making a presence on the forum, I hope it is because they are truly committed to us "little guys". 

Really? Are you for real? Nobody will buy these chips when they are less than 1 month away from mass deploying their new 16nm chip that needs less than 0.1W/GH. Please stop with your shilling!

I seem to have missed your point.  I am not referring to this thread, I was referring to them posting on this as well as the 16nm thread.  They have stated they will release the 16nm chips to home miners.  As for your last statement "shilling" - whatever Huh

Bitcoin Will Only Succeed If The Community That Supports It Gets Support - Support Home Miners & Mining
tvasbn
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 460
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 20, 2016, 06:51:08 AM
 #33


You are releasing your 28nm designs when you already have a 16nm chip out in the wild. Economically this is useless. If you wanted a decentralized Bitcoin Blockchain you would've release this last year, not now.


16nm chip will work on 28nm boards.

"So from 1 UART connection we're able to service up to 1700 hash chips (over 20TH/s with our 28nm chip and even more with the 16nm). 16nm will work in a very similar way."
tutorialevideo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1161
Merit: 1001

Don`t invest more than you can afford to lose


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2016, 10:24:02 AM
 #34


You are releasing your 28nm designs when you already have a 16nm chip out in the wild. Economically this is useless. If you wanted a decentralized Bitcoin Blockchain you would've release this last year, not now.


16nm chip will work on 28nm boards.

"So from 1 UART connection we're able to service up to 1700 hash chips (over 20TH/s with our 28nm chip and even more with the 16nm). 16nm will work in a very similar way."


Expecting the unexpectable

Hosting Bitcoin and any mining gear in Europe/Romania.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228685.msg53918147#msg53918147

For more info you can write me!
spazzdla
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 22, 2016, 08:25:29 PM
 #35

I would assume they are releasing the board info so engis and small companies can prep designs to incorporate their 16nm chip....
jstefanop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2095
Merit: 1396


View Profile
February 22, 2016, 08:56:11 PM
 #36

I would assume they are releasing the board info so engis and small companies can prep designs to incorporate their 16nm chip....

They haven't released anything...those are just pretty pictures to look at. From an engineering standpoint you need detailed datasheets, pinouts, and IC footprints at minimum to begin laying out a board. Maybe you can get a crude schematic together with the info they have released but thats about it. 

Project Apollo: A Pod Miner Designed for the Home https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4974036
FutureBit Moonlander 2 USB Scrypt Stick Miner: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2125643.0
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
February 22, 2016, 09:15:08 PM
 #37

I would assume they are releasing the board info so engis and small companies can prep designs to incorporate their 16nm chip....

If that were the case then people wouldn't complain that you need to send them at least $1M to get the info about their new chips...

chiguireitor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 872
Merit: 1010


Coins, Games & Miners


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 03:32:39 AM
 #38

Bitstream or GTFO....  Cool

Now seriously, on your next 16nm chip you need to do two main things, if and only IF you want to dominate the bitcoin mining business:

  • Sell it on small quantities: 3-packs (no problem with markup here) or even have a sampling program (look at TI's or Microchip's program, you get the drift). TSSOP or QFNQFP versions would make you my personal heroes, like, really heroic.
  • Release a GOOD, CLEAR AND INFORMATIVE SPEC. Bit-level timing, SPI commands, application notes with usual circuits for working the chip.

These two points aren't really that hard, and would show your commitment to a real decentralized, hobbyist oriented business. I just want to get my iron, solder and create my own money making machine. Is it that too much to ask?

NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3626
Merit: 2522


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 02:54:04 PM
 #39

Bitstream or GTFO....  Cool

Now seriously, on your next 16nm chip you need to do two main things, if and only IF you want to dominate the bitcoin mining business:

  • Sell it on small quantities: 3-packs (no problem with markup here) or even have a sampling program (look at TI's or Microchip's program, you get the drift). TSSOP or QFNQFP versions would make you my personal heroes, like, really heroic.
  • Release a GOOD, CLEAR AND INFORMATIVE SPEC. Bit-level timing, SPI commands, application notes with usual circuits for working the chip.

These two points aren't really that hard, and would show your commitment to a real decentralized, hobbyist oriented business. I just want to get my iron, solder and create my own money making machine. Is it that too much to ask?
I fully agree on the info release aspect.
How do chip makers like TI, Linear Technologies, Intel, BM, et al sell their chips? By putting out data sheets and offering sample lots of chips and eval boards.

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome! 1FuzzyWc2J8TMqeUQZ8yjE43Rwr7K3cxs9
 -Sole remaining active developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!