@james.lent gives me negative trust for no reason

[Your Point Is Invalid]

@james.lent left me negative trust calling me a troll, refference is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1380870.0;topicseen

He is asking for source files for files created as far back as 6 years ago and a member of his hateleague is also in his thread asking someone to show proof of identity

[1714800490]

1714800490

[1714800490]

1714800490

[1714800490]

1714800490

[1714800490]

1714800490

[james.lent]

@james.lent left me negative trust calling me a troll, refference is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1380870.0;topicseen

He is asking for source files for files created as far back as 6 years ago and a member of his hateleague is also in his thread asking someone to show proof of identity

You are clearly trolling. I didnt ask for a 6 years ago file, he posted it last december. Now those who can read would know whats being requested. You deserve that feedback.

[Lutpin]

This gunna b funny.

I litterally just bought popcorn, didnt expect this though. Might be online again later to read up.

a member of his hateleague is also in his thread

First off, I never supported/used that name.

asking someone to show proof of identity

I didn't. Go back and read.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

This gunna b funny.

I litterally just bought popcorn, didnt expect this though. Might be online again later to read up.

First off, I never supported/used that name.

asking someone to show proof of identity

I didn't. Go back and read.

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

This is not you asking for proof of identity?

[Lutpin]

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

This is not you asking for proof of identity?

I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

This is not you asking for proof of identity?

I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.

There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

[james.lent]

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

This is not you asking for proof of identity?

I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.

There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.

[Lutpin]

There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Then maybe he shouldn't have used an image created by Gilles Tran as reference of his work and post it in his thread?

[Your Point Is Invalid]

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

This is not you asking for proof of identity?

I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.

There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.

OK, how about you release your information on a public forum with half a million people
You can start with your age, sex and location

This should not be a problem since you have done nothing wrong

You want to  force people to do things you wont do

go ahead, post your data

[Lutpin]

You can start with your age, sex and location

19, male, continental europe
wanna make out?

[james.lent]

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

This is not you asking for proof of identity?

I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.

There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.

OK, how about you release your information on a public forum with half a million people
You can start with your age, sex and location

This should not be a problem since you have done nothing wrong

You want to  force people to do things you wont do

go ahead, post your data

Am i the one who posted googled pics claiming to be mine? Posting his identity as in editing his wiki post. No one asked for his damn address. Now drop the trolling efforts as it only shows how immature you are. Either that or you're an alt of Legenster

[Your Point Is Invalid]

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

This is not you asking for proof of identity?

I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.

There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.

OK, how about you release your information on a public forum with half a million people
You can start with your age, sex and location

This should not be a problem since you have done nothing wrong

You want to  force people to do things you wont do

go ahead, post your data

Am i the one who posted googled pics claiming to be mine? Posting his identity as in editing his wiki post. No one asked for his damn address. Now drop the trolling efforts as it only shows how immature you are. Either that or you're an alt of Legenster

No you are the one leaving negative trust without proof that the images arent his, did you talk to him about this prior to leaving the feedback? or are you a shoot first, ask questions later kind of guy?

Also, how long ago were the wiki posts made?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.

I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list

[The Sceptical Chymist]

But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.

I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list

That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

[james.lent]

But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.

I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list

That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

Ignore him. He's butt-hurt because his stolen netflix account sales thread got trashed : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130035305/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330483.0

[whywefight]

@james.lent left me negative trust calling me a troll, refference is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1380870.0;topicseen

He is asking for source files for files created as far back as 6 years ago and a member of his hateleague is also in his thread asking someone to show proof of identity

First of all there is no "HateLeague" it was a joke used as referal for whiney people like you. We are not Illuminati... I dont get why you not understand if someone says he have done something and post screens (or other stuff), user will wonder when they find that stuff on wikipedia.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.

I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list

That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

Ignore him. He's butt-hurt because his stolen netflix account sales thread got trashed : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130035305/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330483.0

lol, i dont care about my netflix account sales as the accounts i got were free and all i lost nothing in the end
@pharmacist how am i biased agains signature campaigns? am i not in one myself?

[Heutenamos]

Invalid, You don't seem to agree with your Personal Text ?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.

I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list

That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

Ignore him. He's butt-hurt because his stolen netflix account sales thread got trashed : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130035305/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330483.0

lol, i dont care about my netflix account sales as the accounts i got were free and all i lost nothing in the end
@pharmacist how am i biased agains signature campaigns? am i not in one myself?

I have signatures turned off so I didn't notice you had one, but in either case if you don't like the quality of my posts, the trust page is not the place to say so.  Unless I hear different from a moderator.