Elwar (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
|
January 23, 2013, 08:55:01 PM |
|
With the large amount of Chinese characters are Bitcoin addresses a lot shorter or do they just write them using our letters and numbers?
|
First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders Of course we accept bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
RodeoX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
|
|
January 23, 2013, 08:58:35 PM |
|
With the large amount of Chinese characters are Bitcoin addresses a lot shorter or do they just write them using our letters and numbers?
They would use latin numbers and letters, like we see here. If you tried using Chinese characters it would become a different addy. I think?
|
|
|
|
yogi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 947
Merit: 1042
Hamster ate my bitcoin
|
|
January 23, 2013, 09:07:29 PM |
|
Bitcoin addresses are binary data, they are often expressed in Base64 to make them human readable, and allow for easy cutting and pasting. Although Chinese characters could use a similar scheme, as Base64, I'm not aware of any that exists at the moment.
|
|
|
|
rng29a
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
January 24, 2013, 12:08:15 AM |
|
Bitcoin addresses are binary data, they are often expressed in Base64 to make them human readable, and allow for easy cutting and pasting. Although Chinese characters could use a similar scheme, as Base64, I'm not aware of any that exists at the moment. Actually Bitcoin addresses are encoded with Base58 to avoid similar characters (0OIl). https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Base58Check_encodingUsing Chinese characters encoded with UTF-8 would lead to different address lengths as the UTF-8 length for Chinese characters is 3 to 4 bytes.
|
|
|
|
Polvos
|
|
January 24, 2013, 04:04:30 AM |
|
So the next question jumps clear;
Why don't the chinese people have a fork of the Bitcoin project in their base language?
|
|
|
|
kiba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1014
|
|
January 24, 2013, 04:16:27 AM |
|
So the next question jumps clear;
Why don't the chinese people have a fork of the Bitcoin project in their base language?
Why do they care? Bitcoin addresses are just gibberish to everybody.
|
|
|
|
|
mokahless
|
|
January 24, 2013, 07:35:58 AM |
|
So the next question jump is clear;
Why don't the chinese people have a fork of the Bitcoin project in their base language?
I was going to say stuff, but then I realized it would be easier to have you read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_in_computing
|
|
|
|
Zangelbert Bingledack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 24, 2013, 09:08:21 AM |
|
Thousands of character choices versus - what - 62 choices for alphanumeric characters... how much shorter could addresses be?
对馬訂書釘電池?
|
|
|
|
Polvos
|
|
January 24, 2013, 11:26:48 AM |
|
So the next question jump is clear;
Why don't the chinese people have a fork of the Bitcoin project in their base language?
I was going to say stuff, but then I realized it would be easier to have you read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_in_computingThank you.
|
|
|
|
finway
|
|
January 24, 2013, 11:51:39 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
hardcore-fs
|
|
January 24, 2013, 12:05:43 PM |
|
Problem is.. that is simplified... Taiwan/HK/Singapore hate and will not use simplified... China dislikes traditional.... One race... Two systems...
|
BTC:1PCTzvkZUFuUF7DA6aMEVjBUUp35wN5JtF
|
|
|
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1226
Away on an extended break
|
|
January 24, 2013, 12:15:30 PM |
|
Problem is.. that is simplified... Taiwan/HK/Singapore hate and will not use simplified... China dislikes traditional.... One race... Two systems... I read both just fine. It's easy to read both if you're versed in either one IMO. And no, Singapore and Malaysia use the simplified version exclusively, not the traditional version.
|
|
|
|
|