Lutpin give negative trust without any causes!

[BSM]

This fool men gived me negative trust.

1. I deleted my script from forum and don't sell it more.

2. Youwon is my friend and he have right to give negative trust to other. It is not my second account.

3. I am not slot machine owner more. It is also don't working more.

So what i did that he tagged me?  

Somebody with intelligence help me with this situation.  

[1714779734]

1714779734

[1714779734]

1714779734

[whywefight]

You sold ponzi scripts, but stopped. good thing.
You went hard on people sending pm and used words that are not nice.
The relation between you and youwon is more than just friends, his last post was from 2015 and he just left a feedback on me right after you. he didnt even make a post.
you are connected because of reusing the nitrogen address

for me i will review my feedbacks once in a while. deleting was a good idea, using your sock and screaming at people not.

[james.lent]

Somebody with intelligence help me with this situation. 

I guess you're lacking that. As you can see, he's not your friend, you're him

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1384009.msg14078251#msg14078251

[BSM]

You sold ponzi scripts, but stopped. good thing.
You went hard on people sending pm and used words that are not nice.
The relation between you and youwon is more than just friends, his last post was from 2015 and he just left a feedback on me right after you. he didnt even make a post.
you are connected because of reusing the nitrogen address

for me i will review my feedbacks once in a while. deleting was a good idea, using your sock and screaming at people not.

Of course because youwon my friend. We all the time online together. I am used the same address because I bought this site and have control on all wallets.  

I can write you anything but you can't give me negative trust without causes!

[xinzark]

Lutpin never gives negative feedback for no reason. Reasons are rock solid every time
You seems to be selling a ponzi script which is used for scam purpose. OK
You then gave fake feedback to support your point with your others account. Isn't that bad in your opinion ?
Misleading users thought with fake reviews is not a right behavior mate and will surely results in negative trust

[shorena]

-snip-
you can't give me negative trust without causes!

There are reasons listed in your feedback:

- Selling a "doubler" script,
- faking reviews/payouts using their alt account,
- spreading negative feedbacks from several accounts in order to support their points.

You should also stop creating new threads. You already have one for this exact topic -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1384009.0

[BSM]

It is unfair.  But okay negative trust its not problem for me. 

[BSM]

ON THIS FORUM THERE IS SPECIAL HYIP/PONZI SECTION SO IT IS LEGIT HERE TO SELL DOUBLER SRIPTS! PEOPLE HAVE RIGHT TO LAUNCH/PLAY ON PONZI!  IT IS THEIR RIGHT FUCKING LUTPIN AND OTHER MOTHERFUCKERS! I DELETED FROM MY TRUST LIST SOME IDIOTS SO DO WHAT YOU WANT MOTHERFUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!   

[shorena]

ON THIS FORUM THERE IS SPECIAL HYIP/PONZI SECTION SO IT IS LEGIT HERE TO SELL DOUBLER SRIPTS! PEOPLE HAVE RIGHT TO LAUNCH/PLAY ON PONZI!  IT IS THEIR RIGHT FUCKING LUTPIN AND OTHER MOTHERFUCKERS! I DELETED FROM MY TRUST LIST SOME IDIOTS SO DO WHAT YOU WANT MOTHERFUCKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!   

I dont think you understand. Scamming is not against the rules either.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

Lutpin never gives negative feedback for no reason. Reasons are rock solid every time
You seems to be selling a ponzi script which is used for scam purpose. OK
You then gave fake feedback to support your point with your others account. Isn't that bad in your opinion ?
Misleading users thought with fake reviews is not a right behavior mate and will surely results in negative trust

LOL, do your research before posting or you'll end up looking stupid, luptin has had to change his feedback multiple times in the past two weeks because his his reasoning was off

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Lutpin never gives negative feedback for no reason. Reasons are rock solid every time
You seems to be selling a ponzi script which is used for scam purpose. OK
You then gave fake feedback to support your point with your others account. Isn't that bad in your opinion ?
Misleading users thought with fake reviews is not a right behavior mate and will surely results in negative trust

LOL, do your research before posting or you'll end up looking stupid, luptin has had to change his feedback multiple times in the past two weeks because his his reasoning was off

I'm not against Lutpin by any means, but I agree that xinzark's comment just smacks of clique-ee-ness and brown nosing.  And I find that weird, given that Lutpin isn't even a hero member yet.  No one's judgement is that good.  But I'm tired of all this drama--the altcoin section has been quite interesting, so I'll be hanging out on the street corner in that neighborhood for a while.   

[whywefight]

Lutpin never gives negative feedback for no reason. Reasons are rock solid every time
You seems to be selling a ponzi script which is used for scam purpose. OK
You then gave fake feedback to support your point with your others account. Isn't that bad in your opinion ?
Misleading users thought with fake reviews is not a right behavior mate and will surely results in negative trust

LOL, do your research before posting or you'll end up looking stupid, luptin has had to change his feedback multiple times in the past two weeks because his his reasoning was off

I'm not against Lutpin by any means, but I agree that xinzark's comment just smacks of clique-ee-ness and brown nosing.  And I find that weird, given that Lutpin isn't even a hero member yet.  No one's judgement is that good.  But I'm tired of all this drama--the altcoin section has been quite interesting, so I'll be hanging out on the street corner in that neighborhood for a while.   

you dont need to be a hero member to catch people doing something wrong

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Lutpin never gives negative feedback for no reason. Reasons are rock solid every time
You seems to be selling a ponzi script which is used for scam purpose. OK
You then gave fake feedback to support your point with your others account. Isn't that bad in your opinion ?
Misleading users thought with fake reviews is not a right behavior mate and will surely results in negative trust

LOL, do your research before posting or you'll end up looking stupid, luptin has had to change his feedback multiple times in the past two weeks because his his reasoning was off

I'm not against Lutpin by any means, but I agree that xinzark's comment just smacks of clique-ee-ness and brown nosing.  And I find that weird, given that Lutpin isn't even a hero member yet.  No one's judgement is that good.  But I'm tired of all this drama--the altcoin section has been quite interesting, so I'll be hanging out on the street corner in that neighborhood for a while.   

you dont need to be a hero member to catch people doing something wrong

I'm saying that he doesn't have a very long track record here.  That was my point.  But I have no beef with him.  Not going to kiss ass either.

[whywefight]

Lutpin never gives negative feedback for no reason. Reasons are rock solid every time
You seems to be selling a ponzi script which is used for scam purpose. OK
You then gave fake feedback to support your point with your others account. Isn't that bad in your opinion ?
Misleading users thought with fake reviews is not a right behavior mate and will surely results in negative trust

LOL, do your research before posting or you'll end up looking stupid, luptin has had to change his feedback multiple times in the past two weeks because his his reasoning was off

I'm not against Lutpin by any means, but I agree that xinzark's comment just smacks of clique-ee-ness and brown nosing.  And I find that weird, given that Lutpin isn't even a hero member yet.  No one's judgement is that good.  But I'm tired of all this drama--the altcoin section has been quite interesting, so I'll be hanging out on the street corner in that neighborhood for a while.   

you dont need to be a hero member to catch people doing something wrong

I'm saying that he doesn't have a very long track record here.  That was my point.  But I have no beef with him.  Not going to kiss ass either.

ah okay, i got it the other way around

[mexicantarget]

Guns don't kill people. Right? People do it. Those who make guns, they don't get sued when someone kills someone with the gun they've made.

Either way, OP is a retard, but I think it's not fair to give him negative trust for "creating" the "gun".

I'm a coder myself, so if I made a ponzi script for someone and then sold it, it wouldn't make me a bad person, a scammer, or someone who supports scams. I'd remain a coder. A gun craftsman. You folks support fucking casinos, for fuck sake. Do you know that more people lose their homes and lives on gambling, than to ponzi scams?

I'm not saying, both are morally bad. I think that casinos are worse than ponzies.

He once tried to get $50 for 2 hours of work for a script I needed asap, because I had no time to create it. (Kindly avoided any further PM exchanges)
1 month later, he makes a scam accusation thread against my project, for no reason.

So, now you see that I'm not taking anyone's side, just being neutral in all this.

PS: I didn't bother to go through all comments, nor his trust page. I might have missed something.

[cryptodevil]

I might have missed something.

Yeah, an objective argument.

Guns don't kill people. Right? People do it. Those who make guns, they don't get sued when someone kills someone with the gun they've made.

Straw man + Red herring and, btw, so fucking what?

You folks support fucking casinos, for fuck sake. Do you know that more people lose their homes and lives on gambling, than to ponzi scams?

False equivalence + Red Herring question

I'm not saying, both are morally bad. I think that casinos are worse than ponzies

Forced false equivalence by unsupported opinion

This one's the real doozy, though

He once tried to get $50 for 2 hours of work for a script I needed asap, because I had no time to create it. (Kindly avoided any further PM exchanges)
1 month later, he makes a scam accusation thread against my project, for no reason.

Statement supports assertion that user has demonstrated dishonest and untrustworthy behaviour, thereby rendering community tagging of user as being untrustworthy, correct.

[BSM]

What about that PEOPLE LIKE DOUBLERS? PEOPLE KNOW THAT IN 1 DAY THEY CAN LOST THEIR DEPOSIT BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE GET DOUBLED AMOUNT. I mean that people are not very stupid to understand that they can also loose. When casino wrote "WIN JACKPOT 100000000$" they make too offence? Doubler it is like casino - people like it and understand that they can loose.

I am not scammer - I am developer. I am selling my script for personal use only, what about this? I will continue sell it because I lost my trust.

[mexicantarget]

What about that PEOPLE LIKE DOUBLERS? PEOPLE KNOW THAT IN 1 DAY THEY CAN LOST THEIR DEPOSIT BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE GET DOUBLED AMOUNT. I mean that people are not very stupid to understand that they can also loose. When casino wrote "WIN JACKPOT 100000000$" they make too offence? Doubler it is like casino - people like it and understand that they can loose.

I am not scammer - I am developer. I am selling my script for personal use only, what about this? I will continue sell it because I lost my trust.

Dedicated to all anti doubler community!   

You should actually get banned, not neg rep.

[Lutpin]

And I find that weird, given that Lutpin isn't even a hero member yet.

I didn't know I have to be a hero member to leave feedback.
I'll probably be removing all my feedbacks and don't leave any until I become hero.
Would that be OK with you?

As for my "history" over here, it's an open book, ama.

I'm saying that he doesn't have a very long track record here.  That was my point.  But I have no beef with him.  Not going to kiss ass either.

At least I didn't join this forum, buy an account and start off as a hero.


Edit:
Now I feel stupid for bumping this dumb thread and giving BSM the attention he wants.

SEE HERE MOTHERFUCKER.
TURN ON YOUR YOUNG AND SMALL BRAIN 

Your mother bitch.

It is so interesting where live such stupid people like you

[The Sceptical Chymist]

At least I didn't join this forum, buy an account and start off as a hero.

Lutpin you are more abrasive than Mexxer and most others on DT so I was trying to be delicate.  As I said, I've nothing against you and you've done good on the forum.  My only gripe, which is not with you personally, is that anyone can bust scams and bust spam, but it's dealings with bitcoin that make you trusted or not.  In my eyes.  And I confess I'm ignorant of any deals you may have made, so I'll shut up now.

[leowonderful]

At least I didn't join this forum, buy an account and start off as a hero.

Lutpin you are more abrasive than Mexxer and most others on DT so I was trying to be delicate.  As I said, I've nothing against you and you've done good on the forum.  My only gripe, which is not with you personally, is that anyone can bust scams and bust spam, but it's dealings with bitcoin that make you trusted or not.  In my eyes.  And I confess I'm ignorant of any deals you may have made, so I'll shut up now.

Abrasive? cmon now, it's okay to call people salty. It doesn't take a day to figure out that you're saying Lutpin is salty and you don't trust him.
I don't know lutpin enough to trust or not trust him, but I have a little advice for him:
If anything, I think lutpin should ease back on the "abrasiveness" and be a little calmer. We all should. It's uncomfortable for me to call anybody salty, but I just had to post that. It was too much to resist. Sure, OP was raging and basically raised his middle finger in all of your faces, but being "abrasive" to someone doesn't make a situation better.
BSM is just running out of things to say and he's basically given up on his account and he's basically said screw it, this acc is dead anyways. Better just call people dumb and be salty now.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

At least I didn't join this forum, buy an account and start off as a hero.

Lutpin you are more abrasive than Mexxer and most others on DT so I was trying to be delicate.  As I said, I've nothing against you and you've done good on the forum.  My only gripe, which is not with you personally, is that anyone can bust scams and bust spam, but it's dealings with bitcoin that make you trusted or not.  In my eyes.  And I confess I'm ignorant of any deals you may have made, so I'll shut up now.

Abrasive? cmon now, it's okay to call people salty. It doesn't take a day to figure out that you're saying Lutpin is salty and you don't trust him.
I don't know lutpin enough to trust or not trust him, but I have a little advice for him:
If anything, I think lutpin should ease back on the "abrasiveness" and be a little calmer. We all should. It's uncomfortable for me to call anybody salty, but I just had to post that. It was too much to resist. Sure, OP was raging and basically raised his middle finger in all of your faces, but being "abrasive" to someone doesn't make a situation better.
BSM is just running out of things to say and he's basically given up on his account and he's basically said screw it, this acc is dead anyways. Better just call people dumb and be salty now.

You are stuffing my mouth full of words,  sir.  I didn't say any of that.   I did not mean to imply that I don't trust Lutpin.  I'm neutral.

[Lutpin]

I'm neutral.

Act neutral. Think of yourself as citizen of the universe.


Oh sorry, mistook you there for a second.