Bitcoin Forum
November 09, 2024, 02:09:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Generic pass through contract structure  (Read 1459 times)
btharper (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 389
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 24, 2013, 07:38:19 AM
Last edit: January 24, 2013, 08:15:58 AM by btharper
 #1

Looking for input from the community in general about the general structure and issues around setting up assets for different pass throughs available. Given the number of exchanges available I think these may become more common in the future.

The general contract should address any issues likely to come up and anything that might create a problem if the unlikely were to happen, including but not limited to:
  • What happens with funds from sold shares
  • What happens with proceeds from the pass through
  • The cut (or lack thereof) taken by the issuer
  • Suggested: Any other sources of profit derived from the asset (such as referrals)
  • Specific steps if issuer wants to shut down the pass through
  • What happens if the end point of the pass through shuts down cleanly
  • What happens if the end point of the pass through shuts down uncleanly (partial refund, disorganized information)
  • What happens if the end point of the pass through runs off with everything (gone tomorrow)
  • What happens if the exchange the asset is listed on shuts down cleanly/uncleanly
  • Conditions specific to the exchange, such as additional trade fee available on some exchanges
  • How motions on the underlying investment are handled. (Credit: odolvlobo)
  • Protection of the asset from outside issues of the issuer including bankruptcy (Credit: HorseRider)

Can anyone else think of anything that should be addressed in addition to the above? or clarified? Or just other things to be mindful of?

Can anyone offer input on what about a pass through would make it more or less likely to be listed?
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4494
Merit: 3403



View Profile
January 24, 2013, 07:53:16 AM
 #2

How expenses are paid.
How the operator of the pass-through is paid.
How voting on motions is handled.
How dividends are passed through.
How the NAV is calculated.
How assets can be added to or removed from the fund.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
HorseRider
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 24, 2013, 08:00:05 AM
 #3

Bankrupt remoteness: what if the issuer of the pass-through bankrupted and the creditors claim that they have the right to obtain the underlying asset.


16SvwJtQET7mkHZFFbJpgPaDA1Pxtmbm5P
btharper (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 389
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 24, 2013, 08:13:22 AM
 #4

How expenses are paid.
How the operator of the pass-through is paid.
I imagine this is all covered by handling in and out explicitly (What is done with funds from sold shares, and what happens with proceeds from the pass through). I imagine this should cover all money going through the operator for the pass through. Is there anything I'm missing on that?
How voting on motions is handled.
Good point, I imagine most would have holders vote and pass along majority decision, or with as much granularity as possible.

How dividends are passed through.
See first quote about money in and out.

How the NAV is calculated.
How assets can be added to or removed from the fund.
For a single venture pass through (ie to a single other business or asset on another exchange) I don't think either of these should be an issue. Things do get a lot more complicated for ETFs or funds of course.



Bankrupt remoteness: what if the issuer of the pass-through bankrupted and the creditors claim that they have the right to obtain the underlying asset.
Good point, any idea how to phrase the legalese? Both for this case and general protection of the asset from outside problems of the issuer.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!