Please delete this thread

[dpcman]

delete 

[1714191391]

1714191391

[1714191391]

1714191391

[1714191391]

1714191391

[1714191391]

1714191391

[1714191391]

1714191391

[dpcman]

RESERVED

[ingrownpocket]

There is an epic difference inbetween those and stuff you did for LargoG and here on forum.

Well, I have to agree with this one.

[dpcman]

You haven't done any of logos or websites you posted. There is an epic difference inbetween those and stuff you did for LargoG and here on forum.
From what I know about you by now, all you are capable of is ripping-off others work and adjusting it slightly. You can't even cleanup CSS from the
stuff ripped-off and not in use.

I'm not designer in terms of having proper education, papers nor extenssive portfolio, but if you are professional, I am The Master of The Universe.  

Well, that hurts  

The project with LargoG was limited because he specifically asked not to change the HTML of the page, only edit the CSS and that's something really hard to do since you don't have a choice in the page's structure, you can't even target specific tables or divs. Also, you should consider that that the website has a limit of 80kb at any given time because its going to be loaded via Tor. So yes, I can't say it'd be in par with my other projects but I had to make do with the objectives I was given. If anything, he was happy with what I produced.

If you have been a designer for quite some time, you tend to re-use codes you have used for other projects for the sake of saving time. Now tell me, is that ripping off? Is it so wrong to re-use codes so that you could be more productive?

I admit when I first started working with Largo I didn't fully understand what he was asking for, it was in fact the first time I would be designing for a Tor site. The original design and codes are almost quite different than the final one. In the end, Largo just wanted something simple and clean so I gave him that. Sometimes simple is best, that's what I learnt from him.

SubSTRATA, in the end, if the client's happy, so am I.

[dpcman]

Sigh. I don't even want to argue about this but let's do it your way.

Now, I can't prove every single one of them because it'd be ridiculous and a waste of both my time and yours.

Here is a link to one of the sites I have displayed in the samples above.

http://www.deorham.com/

At the bottom of the page there is a 'designed by Regal Studios' (this is a different name I go by in another place)

Just click on it and you have all the proof you need.

If you are still stubborn then you can ask the owner of the site and he can verify that I have worked with him from the basic concept to prototyping in photoshop and through the entire coding process.

If that doesn't convince you, then I don't know what will.

[dpcman]

Fine. Don't believe me. Whatever. Maybe opening this thread was too soon.

You know, I might as well close this thread for the sake of just ending this argument. I thought I could contribute while earning something but apparently you won't let this go.

I'll just compete against you when it comes to bounties and earn my own reputation instead. You won't have a problem with that, right?

[subSTRATA]

?

[dpcman]

Lol, I don't know how that is blackmailing since I'm not going to be thrashing you in the forums.

I just need to earn your trust, right? That's all there is to it, really.

[dpcman]

Personally, I don't get why you feel the need to just thrash people without even knowing the whole story.

I've clearly stated earlier what needs to be said and you won't accept it.

At this point you're just bullying me lol 

[K1773R]

Personally, I don't get why you feel the need to just thrash people without even knowing the whole story.

I've clearly stated earlier what needs to be said and you won't accept it.

At this point you're just bullying me lol 

theres a reason for the orange ignore button

[greyhawk]

Personally, I don't get why you feel the need to just thrash people without even knowing the whole story.

I've clearly stated earlier what needs to be said and you won't accept it.

At this point you're just bullying me lol 

theres a reason for the orange ignore button

Yes, it's called "scammers click the ignore button so they don't have to see valid accusations against them."

[Raoul Duke]

Personally, I don't get why you feel the need to just thrash people without even knowing the whole story.

I've clearly stated earlier what needs to be said and you won't accept it.

At this point you're just bullying me lol 

theres a reason for the orange ignore button

Yes, it's called "scammers click the ignore button so they don't have to see valid accusations against them."

lulz 

[greyhawk]

Personally, I don't get why you feel the need to just thrash people without even knowing the whole story.

I've clearly stated earlier what needs to be said and you won't accept it.

At this point you're just bullying me lol 

theres a reason for the orange ignore button

Yes, it's called "scammers click the ignore button so they don't have to see valid accusations against them."

lulz 

Sounds funny, I know, but I'd venture a guess if we substracted all known scammers, banned users and people run off the forum and inactive for a year, you'd be blue again too.

[ingrownpocket]

Personally, I don't get why you feel the need to just thrash people without even knowing the whole story.

I've clearly stated earlier what needs to be said and you won't accept it.

At this point you're just bullying me lol 

theres a reason for the orange ignore button

Yes, it's called "scammers click the ignore button so they don't have to see valid accusations against them."

HA!