Bubblesbit Dice BULLSEYE+slide dice(min bet lowered)

[ranlo]

Just wondering, I saw yahoo's name on the top of the weekly wagered does it mean I have to beat him to get the first prize or wont he be counted for the weekly wagering? It is kinda funny to see the owner take place however if he is counted then surely Im out of this week as I wont be able to catch up to him

I dont think he is counted on the wagering competition, otherwise it will be so funny to see other players compete with the owner of the site. If till the end of the competition and Yahoo still on first, I think the 2nd player will be the first winner. I'm sure yahoo do not want to get the prize of his own competition.

I may be wrong on this but I think Yahoo has to be considered fir leaderboard prizes purposes. After all tbeing their site implemented into MonetPot owners profit comes from wagered but beside this aspect owners are not different from normal players: when they lose their bets amount are deducted from player balance and goes into MP bankroll and contrary happen for win. So when yahoo wagers that amount he is risking his pocket money just like us. Only difference is he gains back a tiny amount on his bets amount back from MP as site commissions.
I wouldn't se anything weird if he will be considered in leaderboard.

Wanted to chime in on this. I also see nothing wrong with Yahoo taking a leaderboard position on his site. Whether Yahoo is betting or some other player, everything is treated the same with regards to all other players and investors themselves, so there's no issues with this at all.

I know some have an issue on the basis that "you're winning your own contest," but I've personally never had an issue with that. He's not doing anything unfairly or having any special advantage nobody else has.

[Frosxh]

Just wondering, I saw yahoo's name on the top of the weekly wagered does it mean I have to beat him to get the first prize or wont he be counted for the weekly wagering? It is kinda funny to see the owner take place however if he is counted then surely Im out of this week as I wont be able to catch up to him

I dont think he is counted on the wagering competition, otherwise it will be so funny to see other players compete with the owner of the site. If till the end of the competition and Yahoo still on first, I think the 2nd player will be the first winner. I'm sure yahoo do not want to get the prize of his own competition.

I may be wrong on this but I think Yahoo has to be considered fir leaderboard prizes purposes. After all tbeing their site implemented into MonetPot owners profit comes from wagered but beside this aspect owners are not different from normal players: when they lose their bets amount are deducted from player balance and goes into MP bankroll and contrary happen for win. So when yahoo wagers that amount he is risking his pocket money just like us. Only difference is he gains back a tiny amount on his bets amount back from MP as site commissions.
I wouldn't se anything weird if he will be considered in leaderboard.

Wanted to chime in on this. I also see nothing wrong with Yahoo taking a leaderboard position on his site. Whether Yahoo is betting or some other player, everything is treated the same with regards to all other players and investors themselves, so there's no issues with this at all.

I know some have an issue on the basis that "you're winning your own contest," but I've personally never had an issue with that. He's not doing anything unfairly or having any special advantage nobody else has.

well, as i see it there is some kind of advantage if the owner/s are joining the contest they are running, it is not fair to all of their players if thats what they are doing. remember that every wager made on their app (either made by owners or players) they will get 50% of the house edge so basically when the owner is joining the contest they are risking less money into it

[ralle14]

I'm sure yahoo won't be included on his own contest he usually pick the winning user after his name if he's on the top spot. When I was betting here long time ago someone hit the jackpot on the old bubblesbit the most wagered player on that day will get a slice of the jackpot but yahoo was on  the top spot during that time so he gave the reward to the next user.

[cazkooo]

Just wondering, I saw yahoo's name on the top of the weekly wagered does it mean I have to beat him to get the first prize or wont he be counted for the weekly wagering? It is kinda funny to see the owner take place however if he is counted then surely Im out of this week as I wont be able to catch up to him

I dont think he is counted on the wagering competition, otherwise it will be so funny to see other players compete with the owner of the site. If till the end of the competition and Yahoo still on first, I think the 2nd player will be the first winner. I'm sure yahoo do not want to get the prize of his own competition.

I may be wrong on this but I think Yahoo has to be considered fir leaderboard prizes purposes. After all tbeing their site implemented into MonetPot owners profit comes from wagered but beside this aspect owners are not different from normal players: when they lose their bets amount are deducted from player balance and goes into MP bankroll and contrary happen for win. So when yahoo wagers that amount he is risking his pocket money just like us. Only difference is he gains back a tiny amount on his bets amount back from MP as site commissions.
I wouldn't se anything weird if he will be considered in leaderboard.

Wanted to chime in on this. I also see nothing wrong with Yahoo taking a leaderboard position on his site. Whether Yahoo is betting or some other player, everything is treated the same with regards to all other players and investors themselves, so there's no issues with this at all.

I know some have an issue on the basis that "you're winning your own contest," but I've personally never had an issue with that. He's not doing anything unfairly or having any special advantage nobody else has.

Im not sure why everyone seems to be making a fuss about this , Im asking question here. Wether or not he is counted doesnt really concern me. What concern me is that if he is included I wont have enough time for the first place which means that there is no point in trying to get it , it is just that

[yahoo62278]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

I think most people are very mislead on this issue and need to be educated. Honestly the app owners make pennies unless we have alot of bettors on 24/7.


Now lets talk about my weekly wagered contest. My money is no different then anyone elses. If i lose, i lose just like you all. It doesnt go right back into my pocket, or 50% back into my pocket as some of you might believe. I take my beats right along with everyone else.

Our weekly wagered contest is actually very good for the players as if im lucky i barely break even for each week. We are giving away a total of .1375 each week to players. Thats nearly 100% of what we earn most weeks, so im making very little each week, and most weeks im losing money just hosting the contest.

Now as far as me winning the contest, i feel i am eligible to claim a prize. I wager just like all of you. I do not ever take 1st prize(even though i should), i will always take the 2nd place prize if im in 1st place for the week.

We have 2 games where you can wager a ton in a day on a smaller balance. Roshambo and bullseye are 2 very good games to wager alot. So if you see some has 1btc wagered and is in 1st, he can easily be beaten in a day if you play long enough and wager correctly.

I would like to share a strategy for all of you to maybe help you out a bit. Go to roshambo open auto betting. Set your wager to 0.1 and multiply on loss x2. Yes its martingale but it works. Your bet only doubles on a loss. So on a draw it will rebet same wager. On a win you profit .1 of course, but the point is to get alot wagered for leaderboard. This works out perfectly for this.

Player dragonwarrior messaged me and asked how to wager alot so i shared this with him. He said he only had .05btc is that enough. Its plenty guys. He wagered 80000 bits in a few hours of letting bot roll and profitted .003btc. Also got him on leaderboard for the week for another .0025 prize.

Hopefully this clears up at least a little confusion and good luck to all who try our games out.


One last thing, im waiting on my dev to come online so i can pay this weeks wager contest out. Should be within 12 hours

[DarkDays]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

[yahoo62278]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

Lol im letting the decimal fool me, but either way its pennies and doesnt make my risk of playing any easier than a normal player.

[ranlo]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

This is like saying if someone owns 50% of the BR, they shouldn't be allowed to win anything. Which, as you might be able to guess, any of you are fully capable of doing if you have the funds. The simple fact is that Yahoo is getting no unfair advantage.

[JackpotRacer]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

This is like saying if someone owns 50% of the BR, they shouldn't be allowed to win anything. Which, as you might be able to guess, any of you are fully capable of doing if you have the funds. The simple fact is that Yahoo is getting no unfair advantage.

please let me repeat my opinion and you know it very well!

no owner of an app should participate in his own contest (whatever contest it might be) and all MP owners should also not be allowed to participate!

best example is the BB flaw they had and if an app owner will win his own contest or a MP owner will win the contest there will always be one or more who will point the finger...... why to give them a chance to point the finger?

also MP owners should not wager at MP apps but they could do their own app and wager there

and the ambassador of all apps should not wager at all at any app beside his own

[cazkooo]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

This is like saying if someone owns 50% of the BR, they shouldn't be allowed to win anything. Which, as you might be able to guess, any of you are fully capable of doing if you have the funds. The simple fact is that Yahoo is getting no unfair advantage.

please let me repeat my opinion and you know it very well!

no owner of an app should participate in his own contest (whatever contest it might be) and all MP owners should also not be allowed to participate!

best example is the BB flaw they had and if an app owner will win his own contest or a MP owner will win the contest there will always be one or more who will point the finger...... why to give them a chance to point the finger?

also MP owners should not wager at MP apps but they could do their own app and wager there

and the ambassador of all apps should not wager at all at any app beside his own

You should drop your biased hatred toward the other site in MP and drop your personal biased opinion on BB as well. This is his site and he has any right to do what he want, I asked for the question regarding this and he has given his answer so there is nothing wrong with his decision , in fact any decision he made has nothing to do with you or your site at all

[JackpotRacer]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

This is like saying if someone owns 50% of the BR, they shouldn't be allowed to win anything. Which, as you might be able to guess, any of you are fully capable of doing if you have the funds. The simple fact is that Yahoo is getting no unfair advantage.

please let me repeat my opinion and you know it very well!

no owner of an app should participate in his own contest (whatever contest it might be) and all MP owners should also not be allowed to participate!

best example is the BB flaw they had and if an app owner will win his own contest or a MP owner will win the contest there will always be one or more who will point the finger...... why to give them a chance to point the finger?

also MP owners should not wager at MP apps but they could do their own app and wager there

and the ambassador of all apps should not wager at all at any app beside his own

You should drop your biased hatred toward the other site in MP and drop your personal biased opinion on BB as well. This is his site and he has any right to do what he want, I asked for the question regarding this and he has given his answer so there is nothing wrong with his decision , in fact any decision he made has nothing to do with you or your site at all

no one asked you but I dont wonder that you are answering

I answered to ranlo's posting and I gave my opinion to yahoo the owner and ranlo the MP owner and ambassador of all MP apps  so let them answer to my opinion

edit
if yahoo will ask me to stay out of his thread and business I will be glad to do this

[cazkooo]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

This is like saying if someone owns 50% of the BR, they shouldn't be allowed to win anything. Which, as you might be able to guess, any of you are fully capable of doing if you have the funds. The simple fact is that Yahoo is getting no unfair advantage.

please let me repeat my opinion and you know it very well!

no owner of an app should participate in his own contest (whatever contest it might be) and all MP owners should also not be allowed to participate!

best example is the BB flaw they had and if an app owner will win his own contest or a MP owner will win the contest there will always be one or more who will point the finger...... why to give them a chance to point the finger?

also MP owners should not wager at MP apps but they could do their own app and wager there

and the ambassador of all apps should not wager at all at any app beside his own

You should drop your biased hatred toward the other site in MP and drop your personal biased opinion on BB as well. This is his site and he has any right to do what he want, I asked for the question regarding this and he has given his answer so there is nothing wrong with his decision , in fact any decision he made has nothing to do with you or your site at all

no one asked you but I dont wonder that you are answering

I answered to ranlo's posting and I gave my opinion to yahoo the owner and ranlo the MP owner and ambassador of all MP apps  so let them answer to my opinion

edit
if yahoo will ask me to stay out of his thread and business I will be glad to do this

Indeed I answered for this because if you take a look at the previous page, Im the one that started to ask about this. If it wasnt for my question then probably this whole conversation wont be here. For the record, no one will want you in their thread and site with that kind of stinking attitude that keep on bashing things out

[JackpotRacer]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

This is like saying if someone owns 50% of the BR, they shouldn't be allowed to win anything. Which, as you might be able to guess, any of you are fully capable of doing if you have the funds. The simple fact is that Yahoo is getting no unfair advantage.

please let me repeat my opinion and you know it very well!

no owner of an app should participate in his own contest (whatever contest it might be) and all MP owners should also not be allowed to participate!

best example is the BB flaw they had and if an app owner will win his own contest or a MP owner will win the contest there will always be one or more who will point the finger...... why to give them a chance to point the finger?

also MP owners should not wager at MP apps but they could do their own app and wager there

and the ambassador of all apps should not wager at all at any app beside his own

Just for the record, all three of the Moneypot Owners are all down bitcoin wagering on the site.

everyone who gambles want to win and is taking the risk to lose but this was not my point but I am sure you understood my point

[yahoo62278]

Im not asking anyone to stay out of the thread guys/gals. Youre all free to state your opinions, its a free world. I may or may not follow the advice.

As doge stated im down overall on moneypot apps but on my own app im up a lil. Last week i was down 4.3btc and now im +1btc because of my new game slide dice. Im not stating the game is easier to win or anything im just stating ive been lucky on it.

Im posting my stats below just so anyone curious can see.

https://www.moneypot.com/users/yahoo

I know the point wasnt my stats or wagering at all. JPR has a problem with me wagering in my own contest. My stance is simply this, i risk my money just as much as the next guy. I do not take the top spot. Anyone has the same chance to win our weekly wagered contest.

If users were wagering enough for us to even cover the contest i might consider not wagering but if you take out my wagering over the past 3 weeks we would have lost alot more out of pocket then we have already.


I would like to point out to you JPR that you yourself are not following your own advice. It looks as though you have roughly 75-80 btc wagered all across your own site and i see you wagering for your own promos alot. Sure you can say youre wagering for other users for you contests but essentially youre wagering for yourself as well as you get half the jackpot huh.

https://www.moneypot.com/users/jackpotracer

[JackpotRacer]

I would like to point out to you JPR that you yourself are not following your own advice. It looks as though you have roughly 75-80 btc wagered all across your own site and i see you wagering for your own promos alot. Sure you can say youre wagering for other users for you contests but essentially youre wagering for yourself as well as you get half the jackpot huh.

https://www.moneypot.com/users/jackpotracer

those are promos and not contests and those promos cost us a lot of money. it is not a wager contest or any other kind of contest. at our wager contests or any other contests we give/gave the app owners and MP owners are not allowed to participate

that you are participating in your own contest is because you wanna save some coins and thats very sad. just let the users win those prices. but you can do whatever you like but the users dont like it as you see that not many are participating.

let me see you to give promos like we give. we give 2x a day 100 bits to each user for free and we have many takers and that you can see in our thread in games and rounds
and like you were mentioning our ride promos. almost everyday users are riding this promo and we double their amount. like users are going for 500 sat each bet for 1000 bets and we do 1000 bets a 1000 sat and thats almost each day and more than once a day. 1000 bets a 1000 sat = 0.01 so let me see you yahoo doing such promos and maybe it will help to bring some players to your app

your problem is that you will gamble it instead to give it to your customers but it is your sole decision

good luck in your contest

[DarkDays]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

This is like saying if someone owns 50% of the BR, they shouldn't be allowed to win anything. Which, as you might be able to guess, any of you are fully capable of doing if you have the funds. The simple fact is that Yahoo is getting no unfair advantage.

No, that isn't "like" saying that at all.

Did you read what I wrong?

I wrote that what he said in bold was wrong.  He then confirmed that I was correct.  I didn't say anything about a bankroll, or gambling, or that an owner shouldn't be winning his own giveaway.  Again, READ and then comment.  I don't care about any of the petty squabbling, and although it doesn't make sense to offer a prize to encourage play on your site and then win it yourself, it certainly isn't unethical or give you an unfair advantage.  I was simply saying that the thing he said, and bolded, was incorrect.

[ranlo]

Let me chime in now since i just woke up and seen this conversation. First let me address the issue of how much i earn from the house edge. WE EARN .5% OF HOUSE EDGE ON BETS. NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO 50%. If i earned 50% of the house edge id be making enough i wouldnt feel the need to gamble. For every 1btc wagered on any moneypot app the app owner will earn .005btc if his house edge is 1%.

Do you not understand what "house edge" is?  You earn 50% of house edge on bets.  You don't earn 50% of bets.  But you do earn 50% of the house edge (the edge is split between you and MP).

Just look at your example.  1BTC is wagered.  The house edge is 1%.  1% of 1BTC = .01BTC.  50% of .01BTC = .005BTC.  So yes, you do earn 50% of the house edge on bets.  Not .5%.  You earn .5% of every bet that is made @ a 1% house edge.

This is like saying if someone owns 50% of the BR, they shouldn't be allowed to win anything. Which, as you might be able to guess, any of you are fully capable of doing if you have the funds. The simple fact is that Yahoo is getting no unfair advantage.

No, that isn't "like" saying that at all.

Did you read what I wrong?

I wrote that what he said in bold was wrong.  He then confirmed that I was correct.  I didn't say anything about a bankroll, or gambling, or that an owner shouldn't be winning his own giveaway.  Again, READ and then comment.  I don't care about any of the petty squabbling, and although it doesn't make sense to offer a prize to encourage play on your site and then win it yourself, it certainly isn't unethical or give you an unfair advantage.  I was simply saying that the thing he said, and bolded, was incorrect.

Sorry, I think you got hit as collateral damage. My post was in regards to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1390714.msg16428816#msg16428816

Was on a tablet and quoted the wrong one on accident it seems.

[yahoo62278]

https://www.moneypot.com/users/stuffmypocket  Congrats to user StuffMyPocket +2.9btc in a small amount of time

[ralle14]

Managed to double my deposit in just a few minutes and got these small wins back to back luck is on my side today and congrats stuff.
https://www.moneypot.com/bets/535153584
https://www.moneypot.com/bets/535140482
https://www.moneypot.com/bets/535143250
 

[yahoo62278]

Whoa we had a visitor a bit ago. I think hes gonna claim top leaderboard spot this week. Congrats NotTardy




He even won 10btc Very Nice Sir!!!

https://www.moneypot.com/users/nottardy