Satisfaction rating - Bitcoin Core Developers

[adamstgBit]

i count Lauda + 5 sock puppets

we'll be fine...

Certainly. Please stop with this foolishness. I do not vote in such polls (I have rarely done so in the past).

 

sorry.

you should vote, its fun!

[1715211912]

1715211912

[1715211912]

1715211912

[1715211912]

1715211912

[1715211912]

1715211912

[1715211912]

1715211912

[adamstgBit]

there should be a 51% option.

[defcon23]

waww... never seen a poll so stupid...  that's just "posting for posting" .. just a shame  

nothing more interesting to discuss? sincerly..


this make more sense:  

You do realise that this forum has no problem with sockpuppet accounts and therefore any "stupid vote" is absolutely not representational beyond the sock puppet ownership?

So you think that your stupid poll has any validity at all?

The only reason to create such a poll is that you already know the outcome because you control the sockies that are going to vote on it.

(so I'd say *don't bother voting because this entire topic is simply rubbish*)

[Kakmakr]

I think it is a great idea, even if the sock puppets rule the show around here. I voted 80% because I feel more can be done to communicate better with the community. The lack of communication and transparency is one of the contributing factors causing all the confusion. The developers should get a spoke person to represent their interest and to communicate to the public, whilst they concentrate on the coding part. Lots of people should agree that communication during or before a possible Hard fork, or the implementation of something new cause panic, and good communication will solve this.

Keep up the good work, but please communicate better with the uninformed noobs like us.  ^smile^

[ekoice]

I voted with 100% as well of majority (until now). I haven't encounter a problem so far in my BTCitcoin experience, although some have (due to their own wrong doings) so I'm quite happy with the outcome so far. Although there isn't a thing as 100%, I'm sure when more complications rises, developers rise to occasions as well and would do their best to overcome it (that's what I've seen so far).

I would also agree to go with 100% since my experience with Bit coin has been so pleasant so far as well and for other people having unpleasant experience is only because of their wrong ways they might adopted. If take care of our own by ourselves what we write or post it positively helps and I am sure the moderators take nice actions always after checking the stuff thoroughly.

[Jet Cash]

I vote to come out of the EU, oh wait! wrong thread. Sorry, but the way classic is being pushed, I thought Cameron had taken it over.

I voted 100% to try to avoid the rise of neo-classic Bitcoin.

[Lauda]

you should vote, its fun!

It really isn't.

I think it is a great idea, even if the sock puppets rule the show around here.

The poll is useless because nothing prevents you from creating accounts just to vote on it (e.g. high percentage of under 10%).

I voted 80% because I feel more can be done to communicate better with the community. The lack of communication and transparency is one of the contributing factors causing all the confusion.

This seems reasonable albeit I'd argue that this 'lack of transparency' is not a valid argument. I'm guessing most of their work is transparent (open source), you just might be looking at the wrong places. Communication is being worked on (e.g. they've created a website that has useful information Bitcoin Core).