Martingale Soccer Betting System

[Pleja]

Hi guys
Do you know about Martingale Soccer Bettting System,
system requirement Odds min.@3.00 Bank min. 10/20 attempts and goodwill.
example:
07.03. @3.20 Stake 10 Lost -10
08.03. @3.10 Stake 20 Lost -20
09.03. @3.30 Stake 40 Lost -40
10.03. @3.10 Stake 80 Win +248
                                Lost -70 = PROFIT +178
This is an example for 4 days so well define your BANK.
Like I said 10/20 attempts (days)
example:
Start stake 10 / 10 attempts (days) / (10+20+40+80+160+320+640+1280+2560+5120=10230)
Your BANK most be over 11000.

I would publish this game but I do not know if this is allowed???

[1713563322]

1713563322

[1713563322]

1713563322

[bitbaby]

Hi guys
Do you know about Martingale Soccer Bettting System,
system requirement Odds min.@3.00 Bank min. 10/20 attempts and goodwill.
example:
07.03. @3.20 Stake 10 Lost -10
08.03. @3.10 Stake 20 Lost -20
09.03. @3.30 Stake 40 Lost -40
10.03. @3.10 Stake 80 Win +248
                                Lost -70 = PROFIT +178
This is an example for 4 days so well define your BANK.
Like I said 10/20 attempts (days)
example:
Start stake 10 / 10 attempts (days) / (10+20+40+80+160+320+640+1280+2560+5120=10230)
Your BANK most be over 11000.

I would publish this game but I do not know if this is allowed???

Don't know if this would always work but go ahead and explain it further with examples if you can. Btw this is wrong:
Lost -70 = PROFIT +178

Your total investment was 10+20+40+80=150
You won 248 - 150 = +98

[Patatas]

The main reasons this martingle thing won't work is due to the odds you have selected.Which games you find minimum odds @ 3 ? I'm being very practical here,I usually bet on Football and Cricket and trust me ,no matter how obvious is the result ,the best odd is get is @2.13 or so,not crossing @2.50.When the odds turn out to be that high,its obvious for a reason,the team is gonna lose.If you consider this then there is no point in applying your martingle to the general games people play .

[Fortify]

Why not come up with an original name for it? Just sticking "Martingale" infront of your betting strategy does not bless it with some special ability to be right and different games require a totally new way of thinking in order to win big amounts.

[marioantonini]

for play soccer bet with martingale you necessity really high balance (if you like bet and earn a good amount).
for the math, you can lose already all bet at odd 3 (personally, i have lose 9 consecutive bet at 1.4 but not in martingale)

[rossi.joel]

I would recommend this system would apply to me if I lose that is going to hold together sometimes , but try them

[Zeroxal]

Using the martingale strategy takes too much time when betting on sports. Yoy need to wait hours or days to get the result...
I'd rather bet my money on fast 50/50 games like dice or coin flip etc.

[Pleja]

I apologize for the bad calculations,
Your total investment was 10+20+40+80=150
You won 248 - 150 = +98.
You can play system with odds @2.00 and more but system I'm talking about min. odds is @3.00 so what follows is only one type and it is X where the minimum odds @3.00.
I have a friend who played the system,
he start with 10Euro and stakes have gone up over 100euro and bet win (is not trying again).
The system did risky, but how to play a good match probability is increasing...

[bitbaby]

I apologize for the bad calculations,
Your total investment was 10+20+40+80=150
You won 248 - 150 = +98.
You can play system with odds @2.00 and more but system I'm talking about min. odds is @3.00 so what follows is only one type and it is X where the minimum odds @3.00.
I have a friend who played the system,
he start with 10Euro and stakes have gone up over 100euro and bet win (is not trying again).
The system did risky, but how to play a good match probability is increasing...

Its still risky and would require a good sum of capital to bear continuous increasing losses. It is easier to win at sports if you know the game/players, don't need to bet like this blindly.

[Navesh Sapad]

Wow I had never thought of this .. Its cool .. WIll follow this thread and hope to make good profits .

[pooya87]

this way is interesting for sure. but i don't think it is such a good idea to use a strategy like martingale for a gambling game like sports betting.

martingale is better used for games that are purely luck-based so you can make sure you are following a path to profit. but in sports betting you should decide on each match and win if you are like 80-90% sure of your win.

[Phildo]

Why not come up with an original name for it? Just sticking "Martingale" infront of your betting strategy does not bless it with some special ability to be right and different games require a totally new way of thinking in order to win big amounts.

To be fair, calling it martingale is a signal to people with functioning brains to not bother with the system.

Since we are here, this "system" is actually stupider that martingale, if you could believe that.

The whole point behind martingale is doubling your bet on a 50/50 chance. 3.00 odds equals a 33% chance of winning. Since you should only expect to win 1 out of every 3 times, it's more likely that you would lose money in this syste than with a regular martingale. Especially in sports.

[SyGambler]

well what ever the odds are you can use martinagle at any odds , for me I use martingale when I bet on sports not because it works but because I love to bet on sports and I'm not that expert so when I do it I don't except to make money from doing it
the real challenge is to beat sports without martinagle , remember even when you have an edge martinagle will kill that edge if you use it

[BitcoinHunt3r]

i don't think martingale will be profited if don't have unlimited money especially to bet for high odds like that. or maybe OP really good predictor then he can win to save his bet

[lrdeoliveira]

we all know that martingale isn't profitable unless you have one of this two factors:  a lot of luck or an infinite bankroll to play whit.
Btw never say never, i'll take a look at the thdread to see updates about this method

[BTCLovingDude]

interesting way to mix things up in the sports betting. please do update us with how things go in the future.

p.s. since you are using odd of 3, shouldn't you increase your bet amount more than 2x on losses?

[Pleja]

Yes, martingale system (every lost bet 2x).
Why odds 3
example:
Odds @2 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win =160 -150= +10

Odds @3 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win=240 -150= +90
higher profits.

[Phildo]

well what ever the odds are you can use martinagle at any odds , for me I use martingale when I bet on sports not because it works but because I love to bet on sports and I'm not that expert so when I do it I don't except to make money from doing it
the real challenge is to beat sports without martinagle , remember even when you have an edge martinagle will kill that edge if you use it

The whole point of martingale is that the 2x your bet and the 50% chance of winning are the same (or at least close). Doubling your bet when the actual odds of winning are much lower is even stupider than regular martingale because the only reason martingale "works" is because you expect to win half of the bets. You are much more likely to run out of money or not win as much as you need to if you don't expect to win half of the bets, and you shouldn't expect to win half of the bets at 3.x odds because that isn't' how that works.

People need to stop looking at betting as winning and losing. You need to look at the odds of winning and the payout. those are much more important. That is how you tell what are good bets and what are bad ets and how you make money.

[Phildo]

Yes, martingale system (every lost bet 2x).
Why odds 3
example:
Odds @2 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win =160 -150= +10

Odds @3 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win=240 -150= +90
higher profits.

Higher profits because it's harder to win, which makes it more likely to lose all of your money.

You have a 1 out of 1,024 or 0.09765625% chance of losing 10 in a row on a 50/50 bet.

If you are choosing bets with 3 odds, you only have a 1/3 chance of winning, so your odds of losing 10 in a row go up to 1.734152%.

[Dr. Zoom]

Using Martingale in sportsbetting is tricky to nearly impossible not because it can't be done but because of the unfavourable odds. You need to have at least 2 odds and only bet on sports that have 2 possible endings which most American Sports are suitable for. I have seen NHL teams with odds near or above 2 which could work with Martingale if you have a huge bankroll and pick the odds wisely.