Bitcoin Forum
April 08, 2020, 07:04:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no  (Read 42831 times)
gorgon666
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 17, 2016, 06:23:37 AM
 #421

^^^This is not a thread where alts should be piling in to artificially reinforce a position,  either.  Just sayin'.
Which alts are piling in to artificially reinforce a position?

Lauda is selling her signature space at elevated rates. Lauda is also leaving negative ratings for accounts most likely to wish to join signature campaigns under the guise of leaving negative ratings for spammers (not scammers), and alts of scammers without properly vetting the information. By leaving negative ratings for accounts likely to wish to sell their signature, she is reducing the number of potential sellers of signature space, increasing the value of her signature space.

Lauda is also selling her services as a signature campaign manager and has similar conflicts.

Maybe Quickseller is having a hard time selling signature space these days (-117 trust!).  Or maybe Lauda is neg-repping all his alts?  I dunno.

I admit I do find it satisfying that while QS can still troll and troll and troll, at least no one takes it seriously anymore.  Can you guys believe this dude was once on default trust?
Please stop posting nonsense in this thread. Just because you are writing a worthless school paper on speech analysis does not make you an expert in figuring out who is behind various online identities.

You're trying too hard. The amount of butthurt exuded betrays you.
This is not nonsense. This is not butthurt. He really is writing a PhD in linguistics that will end up being useless Cheesy

His analysis is useless and inaccurate. He is trying to distract from the fact that Lauda is an unqualified, inept (and more) moderator that does not have any business being anywhere near authority. 
1586329498
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586329498

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586329498
Reply with quote  #2

1586329498
Report to moderator
AWARD-WINNING
CRYPTO CASINO
ASKGAMBLERS
PLAYERS CHOICE 2019
PROUD
PARTNER OF
1500+
GAMES
2 MIN
CASH-OUTS
24/7
SUPPORT
100s OF
FREE SPINS
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1586329498
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586329498

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586329498
Reply with quote  #2

1586329498
Report to moderator
1586329498
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586329498

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586329498
Reply with quote  #2

1586329498
Report to moderator
1586329498
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586329498

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586329498
Reply with quote  #2

1586329498
Report to moderator
takagari
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
December 18, 2016, 04:47:54 PM
 #422

Is this thread still a thing?
Everyone has issues with mods.
I've moderated and been head admin of a few large forums and facebook groups (nowhere near this size..)
And regardless of what you do, people hate you.

Move on with life and try to stay out of their radar.

Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
subSTRATA
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1043


:^)


View Profile
December 18, 2016, 11:31:37 PM
 #423

Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
nope

theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
takagari
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 02:17:12 AM
 #424

Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.
nope

I reads it on the internets, so it must be true, your silly logic won't change that fact!
Jet Cash
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1907


https://fittotalk.com/english-talk/


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 09:34:22 AM
 #425


Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.

Does it matter?

The Fit to Talk English project is peaking at over 1,000 views in a four hour period - are you one of those guests.
If English is not your first language, then we can help you with your posting on Bitcoin Talk.
- PM me to join if you aren't a member. If you are a member, then we would love you to help other members.
takagari
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 04:49:16 PM
 #426

Some of you forum guys need to pull the sticks from your rear and figure out where a joke is at play. Wow
Jet Cash
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1907


https://fittotalk.com/english-talk/


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 06:50:54 PM
 #427

I thought cum lauda was the feminine of cum laude. Smiley

The Fit to Talk English project is peaking at over 1,000 views in a four hour period - are you one of those guests.
If English is not your first language, then we can help you with your posting on Bitcoin Talk.
- PM me to join if you aren't a member. If you are a member, then we would love you to help other members.
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3234
Merit: 1826


I 💚 Bitcoin


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 09:10:33 PM
 #428

This thread seems to be more about Lauda and less about forum moderator requirements.  Perhaps it's time that it be moved to the reputation section?

tspacepilot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1061


I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 11:19:57 PM
 #429

His analysis is useless and inaccurate. He is trying to distract from the fact that Lauda is an unqualified, inept (and more) moderator that does not have any business being anywhere near authority. 

Pretty sure you're trying to distract from the fact that you're using so many alts in these threads ...

Good luck!

Here's the thing, once you get caught doing this, no one is going to take any threads where QS argues seriously because we all know that most of the opinions in that thread are just you posting under alts.  Maybe go back to that thing where you said you were going to take a long break and stop harrassing us on this forum?
Heutenamos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000


Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 11:32:00 PM
 #430


Also, I know believe Lauda is a girl and shall continue this belief.

Does it matter?

Yes.

yo
myparentsdisownedme
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 12:30:46 AM
 #431

He hasnt really done anything SUPER bad



Unless anyone else has to say something about his history but idk
BitcoinEXpress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1206
Merit: 1010



View Profile
December 29, 2016, 05:35:25 AM
 #432

This thread seems to be more about Lauda and less about forum moderator requirements.  Perhaps it's time that it be moved to the reputation section?


Let me set this back on track.

So no need to move it.

I think Lauda would be a great mod because of the fairness and honesty I have seen in his moderation around the board.

Should be promoted to Global Moderator.


~BCX~
VforVictory
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

V for Victory or Rather JustV8


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 05:41:10 PM
 #433

This thread seems to be more about Lauda and less about forum moderator requirements.  Perhaps it's time that it be moved to the reputation section?


Let me set this back on track.

So no need to move it.

I think Lauda would be a great mod because of the fairness and honesty I have seen in his moderation around the board.

Should be promoted to Global Moderator.


~BCX~
I dont think the Global Moderator isn't a Lauda thing. As you can see on her recent trust page about Memorydealer. Her own decision making got her negative from a VIP user here. She gives negative trust to Memorydealer . And after getting a neg trust back from Memorydealer, she changed her trust to him and make it neutral.
Why changed your trust after getting a negative trust?
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1890

BountyPortals.com


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2016, 05:50:35 PM
 #434

This thread seems to be more about Lauda and less about forum moderator requirements.  Perhaps it's time that it be moved to the reputation section?


Let me set this back on track.

So no need to move it.

I think Lauda would be a great mod because of the fairness and honesty I have seen in his moderation around the board.

Should be promoted to Global Moderator.


~BCX~
I dont think the Global Moderator isn't a Lauda thing. As you can see on her recent trust page about Memorydealer. Her own decision making got her negative from a VIP user here. She gives negative trust to Memorydealer . And after getting a neg trust back from Memorydealer, she changed her trust to him and make it neutral.
Why changed your trust after getting a negative trust?
Something similar happened with BG4. They exchanged negative ratings (the one Lauda sent was questionable at best), then some time later both have been removed.

There was another instance in which someone was publicly criticizing Lauda who Lauda had given a negative rating to, then as soon as Lauda removed the negative the person rescinded the criticism and locked the thread.

It appears that Lauda has been using the strong weight of his negative ratings to prevent others from being critical of him.

The head executive of the executive office of the department of the redundancy department’s office
VforVictory
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

V for Victory or Rather JustV8


View Profile
December 29, 2016, 05:59:00 PM
Last edit: December 31, 2016, 12:42:33 AM by Cyrus
 #435

I dont think the Global Moderator isn't a Lauda thing. As you can see on her recent trust page about Memorydealer. Her own decision making got her negative from a VIP user here. She gives negative trust to Memorydealer . And after getting a neg trust back from Memorydealer, she changed her trust to him and make it neutral.
Why changed your trust after getting a negative trust?
Something similar happened with BG4. They exchanged negative ratings (the one Lauda sent was questionable at best), then some time later both have been removed.

There was another instance in which someone was publicly criticizing Lauda who Lauda had given a negative rating to, then as soon as Lauda removed the negative the person rescinded the criticism and locked the thread.

It appears that Lauda has been using the strong weight of his negative ratings to prevent others from being critical of him.
So she is evading all negative feedback back by changing her trust report to others. And she will not change her other trust report to other that will not affect her trust.
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1890

BountyPortals.com


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2016, 06:16:57 PM
 #436

Lauda will sometimes remove negative ratings that result in the other person stopping being critical of him. It is not always people that can affect his trust score, however it is probably people that are making good points. It is fairly clearly a quid pro quo.

The head executive of the executive office of the department of the redundancy department’s office
BitcoinEXpress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1206
Merit: 1010



View Profile
January 04, 2017, 02:48:38 AM
 #437

Lauda will sometimes remove negative ratings that result in the other person stopping being critical of him. It is not always people that can affect his trust score, however it is probably people that are making good points. It is fairly clearly a quid pro quo.

Why is this a problem?


~BCX~

minifrij
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1214


In Memory of Zepher


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2017, 02:52:43 AM
 #438

Why is this a problem?
~BCX~
Because in QS land only certain people are allowed to resolve trust issues through communication - as they are meant to be. Others must keep them there permanently else they are obviously attempting to censor those critical of them.
Unfortunately for them, Lauda falls into the second group.
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1890

BountyPortals.com


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2017, 02:53:49 AM
 #439

Lauda will sometimes remove negative ratings that result in the other person stopping being critical of him. It is not always people that can affect his trust score, however it is probably people that are making good points. It is fairly clearly a quid pro quo.

Why is this a problem?


~BCX~


This is essentially using his position in the Default Trust network to prevent others from criticizing him. It allows Lauda to act questionably and not be questioned about said shady/dishonest practices.

Why is this a problem?
~BCX~
Because in QS land only certain people are allowed to resolve trust issues through communication - as they are meant to be. 
Often times the criticisms about Lauda are unrelated to sent trust. This also prevents an open discussion about Lauda's actions.

The head executive of the executive office of the department of the redundancy department’s office
minifrij
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1214


In Memory of Zepher


View Profile WWW
January 04, 2017, 02:59:44 AM
 #440

Often times the criticisms about Lauda are unrelated to sent trust. This also prevents an open discussion about Lauda's actions.
They are? Prior to them being added to the DT network and leaving trust ratings there was little criticism about them IIRC, the majority only coming from yourself and alt accounts with a strangely similar writing style to you.
It may be my memory, though could you provide some examples as to when there was a dispute with Lauda not about trust feedback that was solved by sent feedback from Lauda being removed?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!