Bitcoin ranks by ownership

[jonald_fyookball]

Funny list. Kinda cheesy but I enjoyed reading it.  Maybe someday one full btc  = master

[1714966622]

1714966622

[1714966622]

1714966622

[1714966622]

1714966622

[countryfree]

So you just need tomake an $8,000 investment, and illico presto, you're a BTC specialist! Sorry but your ranking system is flawed. It would be better to make a system based on the number of payments you've made. But since most people have dozens of addresses, it would be impossible to make something trustworthy, and that's good. I don't want to be ranked. Ranking is for armies, whereas BTC is decentralized, there should be no ranking.

[Thatstinks]

From what I recall from the pyramid the vast majority of all BTC is held by a tiny group. This fact makes bitcoin use a joke, while the idea of BTC is good the vast amounts held by small numbers is a huge flaw.

The only way to get it worth using world wide by billions is a huge unrealistic price increase. That in turn makes those few at the top uber wealthy. If someone can find the pyramid it would be nice showing it.

It's sad but ultimately Satoshi must return and distribute all his coin or he is no better than the world rulers we have now.

So ranking holders is laughable because the vast amounts at the top are all that matter.

Not updated but you get the idea why a small group could mean BTC is nothing but a Ponzi that will end harshly one day.

http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1009

[lolgato1]

So I'm a regular bitcoin holder since I have 1 bitcoin . I doubt anyone will have that much bitcoins as the price further rises.

[Hugroll]

its a nice system lol, but i think the names are too hard to distinguish for an average person to remember. the list goes down way too much. i mean you u dont see people calling each other "thousandaire" or "ten thousandaire".

[abacus]

What the fuck guys, you cant take a fucking joke? It's just a fucking joke, no need to be angry like this.

Ok you know what I will remove those titles, so dont be butthurt.

I can't believe you really modified them. The list isn't funny anymore!

It seems clear that some people can't differenciate an ironic post from a BIP, but why all the others who can have to pay for this?
Holy cow, the idea of politically correct is killing everything! 

[adibe]

Are you sure for the rank number 1 ? Because i think it's a bit harsh, better you change the name into other good name like newbie or something. and i think it's a good idea about ranks.

[Hirose UK]

I feel badly hurt for my rank. Is this really the best we can define ranks of bitcoin member. This is really what you feel like for below rank members. So sad to see this anyway, I know that this is just part of a post. I am thinking if I should be motivated with this so called name for anyone..

haha I have bad rank too. just don't think it too much so you won't be sad. well I just smiled reading this thread.

OP, is the income of the rank for one week or one month income; or the all of income we got? because, you know, some people have daily income, week income or month income.

[Blind Legs Parker]

Bitcoin God should only be available for Chuck Norris and his 22 million bitcoins.

[nanonymousx]

I like level 1 ranks. It is hilarious.
It also maybe too cruel to the beginners. People say in the old days, you can get a few coins doing faucets, etc.
Download Firefox also pays 1 coin.

[lorylore]

Ok, i am now targeting for bitcoin regular member first. This is kind of funny but i am quite happy to see that it does add some purpose in life. I wonder who can hit rank 7.

[OROBTC]

...

RealBitcoin

Hey, I enjoyed looking at your list and reading the comments, LOL.  

Quick question:

Would I count my "high-water mark" (most BTC I've ever owned), or what I have now (spent most)?  Whatever, my actual BTC expertise is LOWER than my highest holdings.

[krunox123]

I guess I am somewhere between Fiat Worshiper and Champion of Bitcoin. I'm pretty sure Fiat Worshiper should be on Rank Level 0 as they do not deserve to be on Rank Level 1 because they do not even have a single satoshi. Though the name is pure shit, but this is a good joke and/or is an intriguing idea.

[Laviathon]

Thats pretty funny.  Maybe they could wright that into bitcoin talk where you listed your address and it checked your balance.  Not manditory of course.

[SuperCoinGuy]

The names OP have come up are very funny indeed. Bitcoin Signature Spammer made my day so funny and at the same time so true. 10/10 for ingenuity.

[khalized]

       0.05000000 BTC ≥ Bitcointalk Signature Spammer
mmm

but it's impossible with such range discriminate users...
in the last rank with 1milion of btc just 21 people could be a ranked users....
-5 milions from satoshi = 16 people (max)
but the vast majority of people take btc in more than one wallet....
it's seems an impossible classification (and actually no one hold more than 1 milion of btc in the same address)

[kyrios_]

This makes it like a game. Collect bitcoin and level up to attain higher ranks

[khalized]

This makes it like a game. Collect bitcoin and level up to attain higher ranks

yes and with such level it's quite impossible get a decent rank
1000 btc = 400k $

and also you are a sort of poor

naa don't classify people if they are rich or poor... btc was created "for the equality" and not for rank something.

[Kakmakr]

I like the Fiat worshiper the most, but I would rather call it Fiat Slave or Fiat whore. ^smile^ I seriously think, we should give some of these people on this forum some coins for some chill pills, they are very tightly strung and need some medicine to calm them down. Thank you OP, you made my day with this post and I think we must introduce a ranking system for forum members too. < Sig hater / Master spammer / Sig slave / Moan King
and many more comes to mind here > ^joke^

[kyrios_]

This makes it like a game. Collect bitcoin and level up to attain higher ranks

yes and with such level it's quite impossible get a decent rank
1000 btc = 400k $

and also you are a sort of poor

naa don't classify people if they are rich or poor... btc was created "for the equality" and not for rank something.

True true. Just saying how this makes it sound like a game. BTC is created as a revolution, anyone involved is already a winner