Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 01:23:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Australian Government Seeks End to Double Taxation of Bitcoin  (Read 369 times)
OmegaStarScream (OP)
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3472
Merit: 6125



View Profile
March 21, 2016, 04:08:48 PM
 #1

The Australian government has announced that it will back a legislative solution to tax concerns surrounding bitcoin as part of a broad policy statement on financial technology.

Under current tax guidance in the country, bitcoin is considered a form of barter rather than a form of money. Australian businesses must pay goods-and-services tax (GST) if they sell digital currencies, and can be liable for the tax should they receive them as payment.

This policy has sparked criticism from the startup community in Australia, who argue it creates an unfair tax environment. Last summer, the Australian Senate called for proposals to resolve the problem in a report on digital currencies
.

Not a cool move , what do you think guys ?

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
1715261030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715261030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715261030
Reply with quote  #2

1715261030
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715261030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715261030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715261030
Reply with quote  #2

1715261030
Report to moderator
1715261030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715261030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715261030
Reply with quote  #2

1715261030
Report to moderator
1715261030
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715261030

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715261030
Reply with quote  #2

1715261030
Report to moderator
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
March 21, 2016, 06:52:35 PM
 #2

i prefer if they tax and regulate it honestly because it mean that average joe will not be scared anymore to use it, regulating mean = not seen as a terrorist tool
pitham1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 22, 2016, 01:37:53 AM
 #3

i prefer if they tax and regulate it honestly because it mean that average joe will not be scared anymore to use it, regulating mean = not seen as a terrorist tool

True, but regulation with a heavy touch can kill fledgling businesses.
You need to have a sufficiently light touch, so that these businesses are nurtured.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!