Bitcoin Forum
November 17, 2017, 10:06:20 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [CRYPTOSTOCKS] Vircurex [VCX] - Going public  (Read 15029 times)
Hfleer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


Changing avatars is currently not possible.


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 09:15:28 AM
 #41

The chain of arguments is getting too complicated, lets me "streamline it":
I am forming a company (Vircurex Ltx?) which will acquire the current trading platform and its business from its current owner (for 1500BTC). I am offering to sell 30% of the company shares to the public (Face value being sold 3375BTC). 70% I will be holding. For the first one year, I will not be collecting any dividends, all of those go to the 30% shareholders.


Here's why those people posting in this thread are confused with what you're saying.  In one line you say (Vircurex Ltx?) will acquire the business from the current owner(for 1500BTC), which would mean that at this point you no longer own it, so you would not get to sell 30%.  What it should say is that you're forming (Vircurex Ltx?), then selling a 30% stake in it.  Simple enough.

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▓▓▓▓▓  BIT-X.comvvvvvvvvvvvvvvi
→ CREATE ACCOUNT 
▓▓▓▓▓
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
1510956380
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510956380

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510956380
Reply with quote  #2

1510956380
Report to moderator
Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1510956380
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510956380

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510956380
Reply with quote  #2

1510956380
Report to moderator
1510956380
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510956380

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510956380
Reply with quote  #2

1510956380
Report to moderator
smoothie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072


LEALANA Monero Physical Silver Coins


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 02:15:36 PM
 #42

Is there any new info regarding Cryptostocks being hacked?

+1

~ 3 weeks and no response to this thread.

Although there is a report Kumala just published to their site indicating that investors will be taking the hit for the losses in the form of no dividends for months to come.

███████████████████████████████████████

            ,╓p@@███████@╗╖,           
        ,p████████████████████N,       
      d█████████████████████████b     
    d██████████████████████████████æ   
  ,████²█████████████████████████████, 
 ,█████  ╙████████████████████╨  █████y
 ██████    `████████████████`    ██████
║██████       Ñ███████████`      ███████
███████         ╩██████Ñ         ███████
███████    ▐▄     ²██╩     a▌    ███████
╢██████    ▐▓█▄          ▄█▓▌    ███████
 ██████    ▐▓▓▓▓▌,     ▄█▓▓▓▌    ██████─
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─  
     ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩    
        ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀       
           ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀`          
                   ²²²                 
███████████████████████████████████████

. ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM        My PGP fingerprint is A764D833.        SMOOTHIE'S HEALTH AND FITNESS JOURNAL          History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ .
LEALANA  PHYSICAL MONERO COINS 999 FINE SILVER.
 
jubalix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652


View Profile
June 06, 2013, 11:58:21 PM
 #43

Is there any new info regarding Cryptostocks being hacked?

+1

~ 3 weeks and no response to this thread.

Although there is a report Kumala just published to their site indicating that investors will be taking the hit for the losses in the form of no dividends for months to come.


I don't get why people voted for that nan or whatever increase

I don't understand how these sites keep getting hacked, I mean, if you set it up right, and the guy raise 8K BTC in the IPO plus dividends to himslef for the larger part of the shares, he can afford some decent security and IT help.


Then he take is out of dividends to shareholders, well that's a complete lack of discipline to him to run it.

Admitted Practicing Lawyer::BTC/Crypto Specialist.
B.Engineering/B.Laws
king_pin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393



View Profile WWW
June 10, 2013, 05:35:01 PM
 #44

Although there is a report Kumala just published to their site indicating that investors will be taking the hit for the losses in the form of no dividends for months to come.
Where did you get this info?

Help to save a persons life with BITCOIN - http://www.bitcoinsaves.org/en/
thy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 687


View Profile
June 10, 2013, 06:39:52 PM
 #45

You can read here https://vircurex.com/Reports/2013-05.pdf
It's mentined in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226366.0 to.
The minority shareholders(30%), will pay the full loss in the form of no dividend(in breach of whats stated in the vircurex contract on cryptostocks) has kumala decided.
The first 12 months Vircurex majority shareholder kumala(70%) was not entitled to dividend. Now he has decided that those owning the public 30% of the shares should be the ones paying 100% of the loss in the form of no dividend for the next 9 months or so....

Kumala
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525



View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:52:04 PM
 #46

There is no breach in contract, the dividend payment is inline with the result of request for vote #16.

Hacked Account! Don't send any money.
jubalix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 11:25:12 PM
 #47

There is no breach in contract, the dividend payment is inline with the result of request for vote #16.

Kumala

why is the host provider not sharing the cost of this loss for there errors?

Admitted Practicing Lawyer::BTC/Crypto Specialist.
B.Engineering/B.Laws
thy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 687


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 12:58:02 AM
 #48

There is no breach in contract, the dividend payment is inline with the result of request for vote #16.

Kumala

How could it not be a breach of the contract even after the passing of vote #16 for whatever reason some people voted yes on that proposal ?

Vote ID #16 at cryptostocks the vote in Vircurex you mention Kumala:
"Change current process of paying out complete revenue as dividend to paying out 70% of the net profit as dividends and retain 30% of the net profits to increase the NAV until NAV reaches the value of 0.25."

Profit for May one think should have been in the neighborhood of the same as April(an up-going trend that was temporary stopped by the security breach and a few days with service not working 100%) if you diden't temporary lower the fees(to 0,1% was it ?), that might be a good thing in the long perspective(to keep customers that otherwise may go trade there coins at another exchange where that was possible) to do, but was probably negative(at least for that month) to the minority(public 30%) shareholders, so such thing you should probably have taken a vote on before doing.

Well anyway, profit was 130.65 BTC according to the May 2013 Report for the month May, if one considers full profit(0,5% fee) for 1/3 of the months volume and 1/5(0,1% fee) on the volume for 2/3 of the month then Vircurex actually trades pretty good volumes in May, volume up 11% even thou the problems you had that month.

Dividend that should be paid out according to the contract should then be 130.65 and if you had not reduced the fees probably up to around 280 BTC

Dividend according to the vote you mention, if that vote's result is a legally binding reason to change the dividend rules set in the original contract. 130,65*0,7= 91,455 BTC and around 280*0,7= 196 BTC if you had not reduced the fees for May.
The retained BTC to raise the NAV then becomes 39,195 BTC or around 84 BTC if you had not reduced the fees for May.

The shareholders(30% public shares) that effectively have voted to give away 8162*0,25=2040,5 BTC (if the vote is reason to change the original contracts rules) of there dividend for the first 12 months period when the majority owner is not entitled to any dividend to build up NAV value, effectively giving away 2040,5*0,7= 1428,35 BTC to the majority owner, you Kumala,
Those shareholders you have decided that you should punish and take another 91,455 to 280 BTC from this month and around 2300-2400BTC in total(1454 BTC 23 400 LTC and 225 263 TRC) the coming months without any support for the actions you have taken in either the contract or the votes you mention.

Would you care to answer the other questions in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226366.0


bbit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302


Bitcoin


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 12:58:58 AM
 #49

Is there any new info regarding Cryptostocks being hacked?

+1
+1 +1


           █████████████████     ████████
          █████████████████     ████████
         █████████████████     ████████
        █████████████████     ████████
       ████████              ████████
      ████████              ████████
     ████████     ███████  ████████     ████████
    ████████     █████████████████     ████████
   ████████     █████████████████     ████████
  ████████     █████████████████     ████████
 ████████     █████████████████     ████████
████████     ████████  ███████     ████████
            ████████              ████████
           ████████              ████████
          ████████     █████████████████
         ████████     █████████████████
        ████████     █████████████████
       ████████     █████████████████
▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
▬▬ THE LARGEST & MOST TRUSTED ▬▬
      BITCOIN SPORTSBOOK     
   ▄▄
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██     
██
██
             ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▄
     ▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀        ▀▄▄▄▄           
▄▀▀▀▀                 █   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
█                    ▀▄          █
 █   ▀▌     ██▄        █          █               
 ▀▄        ▐████▄       █        █
  █        ███████▄     ▀▄       █
   █      ▐████▄█████████████████████▄
   ▀▄     ███████▀                  ▀██
    █      ▀█████    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
     █       ▀███   ████      ████   ██
     ▀▄        ██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
      █        ██        ▄██▄        ██
       █       ██        ▀██▀        ██
       ▀▄      ██    ▄▄        ▄▄    ██
        █      ██   ████      ████   ██
         █▄▄▄▄▀██    ▀▀        ▀▀    ██
               ██▄                  ▄██
                ▀████████████████████▀




  CASINO  ●  DICE  ●  POKER   
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
   24 hour Customer Support   

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
jubalix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 03:09:18 PM
 #50

There is no breach in contract, the dividend payment is inline with the result of request for vote #16.

Kumala

How could it not be a breach of the contract even after the passing of vote #16 for whatever reason some people voted yes on that proposal ?

Vote ID #16 at cryptostocks the vote in Vircurex you mention Kumala:
"Change current process of paying out complete revenue as dividend to paying out 70% of the net profit as dividends and retain 30% of the net profits to increase the NAV until NAV reaches the value of 0.25."

Profit for May one think should have been in the neighborhood of the same as April(an up-going trend that was temporary stopped by the security breach and a few days with service not working 100%) if you diden't temporary lower the fees(to 0,1% was it ?), that might be a good thing in the long perspective(to keep customers that otherwise may go trade there coins at another exchange where that was possible) to do, but was probably negative(at least for that month) to the minority(public 30%) shareholders, so such thing you should probably have taken a vote on before doing.

Well anyway, profit was 130.65 BTC according to the May 2013 Report for the month May, if one considers full profit(0,5% fee) for 1/3 of the months volume and 1/5(0,1% fee) on the volume for 2/3 of the month then Vircurex actually trades pretty good volumes in May, volume up 11% even thou the problems you had that month.

Dividend that should be paid out according to the contract should then be 130.65 and if you had not reduced the fees probably up to around 280 BTC

Dividend according to the vote you mention, if that vote's result is a legally binding reason to change the dividend rules set in the original contract. 130,65*0,7= 91,455 BTC and around 280*0,7= 196 BTC if you had not reduced the fees for May.
The retained BTC to raise the NAV then becomes 39,195 BTC or around 84 BTC if you had not reduced the fees for May.

The shareholders(30% public shares) that effectively have voted to give away 8162*0,25=2040,5 BTC (if the vote is reason to change the original contracts rules) of there dividend for the first 12 months period when the majority owner is not entitled to any dividend to build up NAV value, effectively giving away 2040,5*0,7= 1428,35 BTC to the majority owner, you Kumala,
Those shareholders you have decided that you should punish and take another 91,455 to 280 BTC from this month and around 2300-2400BTC in total(1454 BTC 23 400 LTC and 225 263 TRC) the coming months without any support for the actions you have taken in either the contract or the votes you mention.

Would you care to answer the other questions in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226366.0





this, your shifting wealth while it doesn't effect you, to you!

Admitted Practicing Lawyer::BTC/Crypto Specialist.
B.Engineering/B.Laws
numberbit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5


View Profile
July 16, 2013, 11:18:16 PM
 #51

Where can we find the JUN 2013 monthly report?  Interested in how much of the deficit has been paid off thus far.
Kuroth
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile WWW
July 17, 2013, 12:55:27 AM
 #52

Watching.. 

numberbit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 02:27:22 PM
 #53

Where can we find the JUN 2013 monthly report?  Interested in how much of the deficit has been paid off thus far.

Still cannot find any of these documents at https://vircurex.com/welcome/investors....

JUN 2013
JUL 2013
AUG 2013 <- Quarterly statement

Interested in how much of the deficit has been paid off thus far.
mechs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 06:04:09 PM
 #54

Update on the listing.

We have two positive news for the listing of Vircurex.

1. The license fee costs for the platform has been reduced by 200BTC.
2. The cost of BTC/USD has changed in a favourable way, i.e. we will require to raise less BTCs.

Assuming the BTC/USD remains at its current level, we'll adjust he listing as follows:

   Total number of shares issued:   31,000 shares
   Total publicly listed/traded shares:    9,300 shares

Kumula,
  I have used your exchange and like it.  But this is a terrible deal for shareholders.  It is not fair, common or reasonable to charge a large licensing fee and keep the majority of the equity.  The licensing fee to yourself is a scam and you know it.  It one or the other - when you do an IPO, your payout is two parts:
1. You can now draw a management fee
2. The equity you still hold is now easy to sell - you have liquidity
 
    If you are serious, scrap the IPO and remake the prospectus. 
numberbit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 12:39:25 AM
 #55

So, I happened to notice that the AUG 2013 report is now available.

https://vircurex.com/welcome/investors

What does it mean for depositors (user's accounts) that the exchange is reporting a book value of -931.95 BTC ?
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


/dev/null


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 06:51:48 AM
 #56

So, I happened to notice that the AUG 2013 report is now available.

https://vircurex.com/welcome/investors

What does it mean for depositors (user's accounts) that the exchange is reporting a book value of -931.95 BTC ?
nothing id say, otherwise problems would already have arised. its just sad he put his own failures (the hacks) to us investors... this was probably one of my worst investments :S

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
shmoula
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 296


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2013, 12:26:14 PM
 #57

Well, since vircurex and cryptostocks are related a bit, I'll try to link my question about transaction history on cryptostocks in another thread. Hope someone can help. Thanks for your time!

Habbeat - beat your habits more effective way!!!
Always empty box(no cat also no coin): 1SHM1tiur2iNBCVxCBr7vAJ84PrPZ6d6v
Bullbear
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29


View Profile
November 03, 2013, 10:07:23 PM
 #58

Kumala, is there an envisaged date when dividends will resume? The NAV seems to be approaching the threshold of 0.25.

60 GH/s BFL Single SC - Pre-Order Yours Today!
`````` Only $1299.99 - Bitcoin Mining Hardware - ASIC Bitcoin Miner - Butterfly Labs (http://butterflylabs.com) ``````
thy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 687


View Profile
November 03, 2013, 10:38:55 PM
 #59

Kumala, is there an envisaged date when dividends will resume? The NAV seems to be approaching the threshold of 0.25.
Vircurex showes a number of -0,0324 btc in there august report those number dosent make much sence thou. Do you have any other information about the real number that is higher than that and that vircurex reported numbers is faked then ?

Vircurex should have been paying dividend every month, they break there contract with the shareholders.

At the moment he refuses to follow the contract and lets the minority sharehloders (30%) pay the 2500 btc+20 000 usd and he(70% shareolder) pays nothing of this himself.
He also hasent showed any evidence that vircurex actually lost any btc, other digital currency or the 20 000 usd, so at the moment it looks like vircurex themself is behind it.

The way it's looking now kumala will never pay any dividend to the minority shareholders unless people take him to court.

shmoula
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 296


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2013, 10:12:15 PM
 #60

I think vircurex and cryptostocks are just one big scam.

Vircurex showes a number of -0,0324 btc in there august report those number dosent make much sence thou. Do you have any other information about the real number that is higher than that and that vircurex reported numbers is faked then ?

Vircurex should have been paying dividend every month, they break there contract with the shareholders.

At the moment he refuses to follow the contract and lets the minority sharehloders (33%) pay the 2500 btc+20 000 usd and he(67% shareolder) pays nothing of this himself.
He also hasent showed any evidence that vircurex actually lost any btc, other digital currency or the 20 000 usd, so at the moment it looks like vircurex themself is behind it.

The way it's looking now kumala will never pay any dividend to the minority shareholders unless people take him to court.

Habbeat - beat your habits more effective way!!!
Always empty box(no cat also no coin): 1SHM1tiur2iNBCVxCBr7vAJ84PrPZ6d6v
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!