bitbond (amazingrando)

[camolist]

he has now locked the discussion thread quoted above


now i have to ask why is he not tagged yet?


it is not disputable that he defaulted. he details it in his thread

[CurbsideProphet]

This statement:

The majority bondholders received the same 2mh/s per bond and 105% PPS.  Everyone has the same bonds/bond terms

Is contradicted by his next two bullets:

To give added protection to their large investment, the majority bondholders requested detailed contracts signed and notarized.

Due to the detailed contract terms, I was obliged to mine for them as long as possible, even when losing money

And also by the fact that he paid off the 85%.  It's rather clear that everyone did not have the same terms.  The 15% for all intents and purposes was subordinated debt without the bond holders knowledge. 

I'm sorry for all of you that lost money to this guy, I'm with the majority here, this guy needs to be tagged until he makes all his bond holders whole.

[Bitinvestor]

I'm sorry for all of you that lost money to this guy, I'm with the majority here, this guy needs to be tagged until he makes all his bond holders whole.

Thanks for your kind words!

I love it how he tried to "name and shame" Josh & BFL because they didn't "honor" his "order":

In recent discussions with BFL Josh, BFL has decided not to honor our order because it was not paid.

Haha, big surprise there!

Hey scammingrandy, I have an idea! Why don't you stop making a fool of yourself and start paying back your debt?

[camolist]

admin responsible for tagging scammers has been notified about this thread and the poll thread

evidence abound. person to be tagged admitting in his own words about defaulting on the contract


yet no tag given


you've got to ask yourself.. why?

[camolist]

still no resolution

yet the forum allows him to stay un tagged as a scammer


makes you wonder who those preferred investors who are still being paid out are.......

[MPOE-PR]

Seeing how recently Tom got his....

[Phinnaeus Gage]

This is the guy you are searching for: https://twitter.com/amazingrando Randy Oest aka Amazing Rando aka amazingrando

Interesting!

Randy Oest ‏@amazingrando
Humming the theme from Indiana Jones this morning. I think it is because my Geek Chic table delivers in a few weeks. http://yfrog.com/oc2o4avj

[Bitinvestor]

Interesting!

Interesting indeed. I wonder where he got the money from to buy useless stuff like that...

[camolist]

moved to meta.

i would like an explanation from the forum admin why someone blatantly breaking a contract is not tagged


maybe the ignored scam topic(s) were missed, maybe the PM was missed, but can a topic in forum related topics be missed?

[camolist]

moved to meta.

i would like an explanation from the forum admin why someone blatantly breaking a contract is not tagged


maybe the ignored scam topic(s) were missed, maybe the PM was missed, but can a topic in forum related topics be missed?

And back to this sub forum with no answer

Well that confirms things

Admin are quite fine with allowing a clear scam to happen with no response

Someone defaulting on a 1btc loan is taken care of same day though

[MPOE-PR]

Someone defaulting on a 1btc loan is taken care of same day though

Admittedly there's good reason for that: 1 BTC deals rarely get as complicated, with as many parties involved and so forth.

[camolist]

Admittedly there's good reason for that: 1 BTC deals rarely get as complicated, with as many parties involved and so forth.

yes
but how much more simplified can it get then a copy of the contract and a link to the bitbond listing showing 0 payments

[dishwara]

amazingrando got scammer tag.

I think, since he got tagged "scammer", he doesn't have to fear, here after.
Coz so far not many scammers gave back coins & removed the scammer tag.
1 or 2 somewhat did good, even though its not full, example - nefario giving back coins & assets.

The shutdown of GLBSE by nefario, actually showed the true face of many asset creators/owners ugly face.