Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 02:12:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Help me do research - Get 0.01 BTC.  (Read 1175 times)
Moshi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
February 03, 2013, 06:31:47 PM
 #21

Moshi, you are right, I did something similar before. I don't believe I have enough data and so I'm trying to get some more with this round. I am planning to have a chart that would eventually approximately fit a function. Already you can tell that the personal preference is usually more cautious than the "Most People" perception.

It's based on a video in the link here - http://www.veniaminilmer.com/timerationality

I believe that behavioural economics is one of the least well know subjects to have been touched by science, and I believe I am barely scratching the surface with this stuff.

First: recieved the transaction. Thanks, mate.

Second, this might not be heavily into my field of interest, but I'd imagine that, since this is psychological nonsense, you might not want to publish your expected results (in this case, the relation of the two lines to approximate a function) before you publish the actual results. That could easily cause your audience to subconsciously or intentionally skew the results in a certain direction. That, and I'd imagine you're getting these results from somewhere other than this forum: this place is full of relatively like-minded individuals, and in general the Bitcoin community is likely much closer (but not quite  Grin) to masters of probability in comparison to the general public, and that could also skew your results if you're hoping your subjects will take the offerings at face value and not heavily compare them.

Wishing you luck, mate; I'd like to see your results when you're finished, if possible.
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714140733
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714140733

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714140733
Reply with quote  #2

1714140733
Report to moderator
litehacker (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 03, 2013, 06:34:04 PM
 #22

Sent to camolist and JackRabiit.
Thank you for your interest Matthew N. Wright.

Moshi, I understand the risks of publicly displaying the information before it is "finished".
I believe in open information even in development as it could spread ideas. Just like open source projects are "open" even under development.
This is not the only location where I am getting results from. If you are interested in further results, feel free to spread the test to your friends.

hi
peepee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 03, 2013, 06:42:01 PM
 #23

7059ddfff33b8eff60eb04328f65bd81
1EvE8haMoWwet521GZLZTbv8hqQobEEwRD
Moshi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
February 03, 2013, 06:42:43 PM
 #24

I can't fault you for your methods and ideals, especially if they work.

I won't agree with the analogy with open-source projects, however: the biggest downsides I could think of for releasing a program's source while under development are plagiarism - an issue no matter when the source is released - and injection - that is, taking a docile application (say, Electrum) and dropping a payload into it, easier than would be possible without the source. The former is a non-issue in this case for aforementioned reasons, and the latter can be circumvented by simply compiling from the original, untainted source rather than using any pre-compiled applications.

Here, releasing information about the test that isn't necessary cannot easily be redacted. However, the analogy is just that: an analogy, and one that isn't meant to be spotless, and I'm just nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking.
litehacker (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 03, 2013, 06:47:54 PM
 #25

Sent to peepee.

hi
litehacker (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 03, 2013, 06:53:57 PM
 #26

Sent to gweedo.

hi
litehacker (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 03, 2013, 07:01:37 PM
 #27

Code: 3a36a47f609f400f9a236c8480a2c976
Bitcoin Address: 3a36a47f609f400f9a236c8480a2c976

If I was able to get the BTC's :p



pinger, the bitcoin address is listed as the hash code..

hi
xidram
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
February 03, 2013, 07:06:09 PM
 #28

Code: 27823d93572281ff901defe7f04067bb
Address: 1L6miPi3h8xCLPCkcekCLHU3eWxJ93jp1B
litehacker (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 03, 2013, 07:10:47 PM
 #29

Sent to xidram.

The hour has come, so the hash will not appear any more.
Thank you everyone for participating.

hi
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!