|
February 03, 2013, 07:04:31 PM |
|
From what I've gathered/inferred:
Pros: The network is far more secure now that miners can get their hands on ASICs. While it's arguable that it's easier for a single miner to gather <51% of the network hashrate using ASICs rather than GPUs, it would have been even easier for a malicious party with enough funds to produce an ASIC to do just that while miners were still using GPUs.
The exclusivity of ASICs may pull the concept of using Bitcoin away from "mining" to "spending". My first impression of the system was not "instantaneous, anonymous, irreversible, decentralized transactions", it was "free money". That's not what Bitcoin's meant to do, obviously, but considering that any friends of mine who had heard of the system had the same "free money" idea, I wouldn't be surprised if it's a common conception. When you add in ASICs, however, there's no logical reason to bring up "free money" any longer as the average person cannot produce much from mining. Arguably a bad situation, but it'll bring focus back to Bitcoin's original intentions.
Cons: There's an exclusivity in mining now. While (as stated above) there's arguably good to that, it also means the average Joe can't help secure the network. This is mostly overturned by point 1 (again, arguably). The bigger issue, however, is that at most 300 people will control almost half the network. That's a much scarier number than, say, 20,000 people, and means that's there's just that many fewer miners that need to turn malicious to really screw some things up.
...I can't think of anything else right now. Oh, mercy me...
|