Spamhunters Slam Spam Ham

[Spamhunter]

This thread is for reference to my trust comments and those that want to show me I was wrong about their spamming.
For the three I have left trust, you will find reference sometime Sunday and I will pm you with a link to this thread.
If you can show I was wrong, conments will be removed.
If you improve posts over 40 posts I will change to neutral comment.
If you fall backwards after warning negative comment becomes permanent.

Will edit tomorow.

[1714908296]

1714908296

[1714908296]

1714908296

[1714908296]

1714908296

[Joel_Jantsen]

But your feedback barely matters.It will be hidden under those other 10 negative feedbacks listed as untrusted members.

[whywefight]

This thread is for reference to my trust comments and those that want to show me I was wrong about their spamming.
For the three I have left trust, you will find reference sometime Sunday and I will pm you with a link to this thread.
If you can show I was wrong, conments will be removed.
If you improve posts over 40 posts I will change to neutral comment.
If you fall backwards after warning negative comment becomes permanent.

Will edit tomorow.

well, first of all i would suggest you improve your feedbacks by leaving a reference...

[Spamhunter]

But your feedback barely matters.It will be hidden under those other 10 negative feedbacks listed as untrusted members.

This thread is for reference to my trust comments and those that want to show me I was wrong about their spamming.
For the three I have left trust, you will find reference sometime Sunday and I will pm you with a link to this thread.
If you can show I was wrong, conments will be removed.
If you improve posts over 40 posts I will change to neutral comment.
If you fall backwards after warning negative comment becomes permanent.

Will edit tomorow.

well, first of all i would suggest you improve your feedbacks by leaving a reference...

That is the plan for this thread, it will be linked for details to future spammers. Just have not had time yet to update those I marked. Future marks will have reference to go off.


As I post here my rank will increase. Really not doing this for my account but a reference for campaigns potentially.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

Excellent, someone trying to do exactly what Lutpin and mexxer-2 did to get fame and to get on DT, @OP do you want me to contact blazed so he can put you on his downlist from now?

[Patatas]

Excellent, someone trying to do exactly what Lutpin and mexxer-2 did to get fame and to get on DT, @OP do you want me to contact blazed so he can put you on his downlist from now?

Well,"fame" is a bold word.Could you elaborate in any possible way how Lutpin/Mex is taking advantage of the fame ? Like are they're getting paid or laid by being on the DT ? Last time I checked,they were abused and insulted every possible way for negative repping obvious spams.Someone even put a bounty to find Lupin's details so they can physically damage him.That sounds like fame indeed.Unfortunately Blazed won't add newbie accounts,you should be a minimum of a Senior Member to be there.

P.S. busting spams is just an alternative.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

Excellent, someone trying to do exactly what Lutpin and mexxer-2 did to get fame and to get on DT, @OP do you want me to contact blazed so he can put you on his downlist from now?

Well,"fame" is a bold word.Could you elaborate in any possible way how Lutpin/Mex is taking advantage of the fame ? Like are they're getting paid or laid by being on the DT ? Last time I checked,they were abused and insulted every possible way for negative repping obvious spams.Someone even put a bounty to find Lupin's details so they can physically damage him.That sounds like fame indeed.Unfortunately Blazed won't add newbie accounts,you should be a minimum of a Senior Member to be there.

P.S. busting spams is just an alternative.

IIRC Lutpin was a full member when he was added, hence defeating your point

They are taking advantage of the system, not the fame

I'm not going to elaborate, you should lurk more

[Patatas]

IIRC Lutpin was a full member when he was added, hence defeating your point

They are taking advantage of the system, not the fame

I'm not going to elaborate, you should lurk more

No,I'm damn sure he was a Senior Member when he was added to the DT. Without suitable proofs,Your Point Is Invalid (haha pun intended).Leaving feedback on the right people is not the trust system abuse.If the feedback is not deserved,you can always open a thread in reputation and see what the community has about it.The answer's will be convincing indeed.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

IIRC Lutpin was a full member when he was added, hence defeating your point

They are taking advantage of the system, not the fame

I'm not going to elaborate, you should lurk more

No,I'm damn sure he was a Senior Member when he was added to the DT. Without suitable proofs,Your Point Is Invalid (haha pun intended).Leaving feedback on the right people is not the trust system abuse.If the feedback is not deserved,you can always open a thread in reputation and see what the community has about it.The answer's will be convincing indeed.

You're damn wrong https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1398131.msg14194628#msg14194628
If we have to be opening threads for every other trust rating they make then them being on the list is a waste of time\

I think its best if you just stop talking since you dont have proof of anything you are saying

[Lutpin]

Excellent, someone trying to do exactly what Lutpin and mexxer-2 did to get fame and to get on DT

I didn't ask to get on DT. I also have no "claim to fame", as some people like to call what I'm doing.

IIRC Lutpin was a full member when he was added, hence defeating your point

I became DT2 on February 14th, that's 4 activity periods back, hence I was senior member with 252 activity.

I think its best if you just stop talking since you dont have proof of anything you are saying

He was right with me being a senior member when getting on DT2.

[Patatas]

I think its best if you just stop talking since you dont have proof of anything you are saying

Okay.I understand you are Butthurt and maybe Lutpin has tagged couple of your Alt's which you're not completely satisfied with.I should really stop talking as this is none of my business.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

I think its best if you just stop talking since you dont have proof of anything you are saying

Okay.I understand you are Butthurt and maybe Lutpin has tagged couple of your Alt's which you're not completely satisfied with.I should really stop talking as this is none of my business.

LOL, more baseless accusations from this member, If I had alts and Lutpin tagged them, It would be removed within 24 hours

Please do some research before you post, it makes you appear retarded

[Your Point Is Invalid]

Excellent, someone trying to do exactly what Lutpin and mexxer-2 did to get fame and to get on DT

I didn't ask to get on DT. I also have no "claim to fame", as some people like to call what I'm doing.

IIRC Lutpin was a full member when he was added, hence defeating your point

I became DT2 on February 14th, that's 4 activity periods back, hence I was senior member with 252 activity.

I did not say you did it for fame, I'm saying that the person is doing the same thing which lead to your fame and to you being added to DT, the user is following in your footsteps to be added to DT

[Lutpin]

the user is following in your footsteps to be added to DT

When did I expose signature spammers (besides those being in the campaigns I manage), and when did this become the (sole) reason I am in the downlist of Blazed?
I haven't left negative feedbacks for people spamming (and I barely left some neutral comments on that matter),
when I make reports, I either make them to moderators because I think those users should be banned, or I make them to the signature campaign managers (often, that's one and the same person, yay for yobit).
Mostly, those reports are made via private messages (oh, I can't count the fame I get for it).

[Maskedman]

This is becoming ridiculous these alt accounts trying to becoming famous by spotting "horrible scams" where there is not.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

This is becoming ridiculous these alt accounts trying to becoming famous by spotting "horrible scams" where there is not.

Well we have mexxer-2, lutpin and blazed to blame for people thinking like this

[Lutpin]

This is becoming ridiculous these alt accounts trying to becoming famous by spotting "horrible scams" where there is not.

Well we have mexxer-2, lutpin and blazed to blame for people thinking like this

I'm an alt account of whom again?

[Your Point Is Invalid]

This is becoming ridiculous these alt accounts trying to becoming famous by spotting "horrible scams" where there is not.

Well we have mexxer-2, lutpin and blazed to blame for people thinking like this

I'm an alt account of whom again?

People who have been here are making new accounts to try to get on DT
Learn how to read, not just call words.

If you want English classes pm me

[Lutpin]

People who have been here are making new accounts to try to get on DT. Learn how to read, not just call words.
If you want English classes pm me

And how exactly am I to blame for people making alt accounts?

My untouchableness

[whywefight]

If I had alts and Lutpin tagged them, It would be removed within 24 hours

How? Why?