Dooglus is supporting ponzis

[Hippie Tech]

@Hippie Tech - I am not sure I am understanding the context of your quotes in relation to dooglus supporting ponzis.

These and the posts that followed depict how he manipulates people and/or their coins/ponzi.

The easymine/stakes, the fork and "the digger" are examples as to how he goes about his business.

I don't know if I understand either.  Are you saying that dooglus caused or was "the digger".  As I recall, that digging whale, as he was known, caused clam price to drop by an order of magnitude.  What would dooglus stand to gain by devaluing his own money by 90%?

The insiders almost never lose.

They ALWAYS know when it is time to jump on or off that proverbial rocket "to da muun".

[Coinonomous]

@Hippie Tech - I am not sure I am understanding the context of your quotes in relation to dooglus supporting ponzis.

These and the posts that followed depict how he manipulates people and/or their coins/ponzi.

The easymine/stakes, the fork and "the digger" are examples as to how he goes about his business.

I don't know if I understand either.  Are you saying that dooglus caused or was "the digger".  As I recall, that digging whale, as he was known, caused clam price to drop by an order of magnitude.  What would dooglus stand to gain by devaluing his own money by 90%?

The insiders almost never lose.

They ALWAYS know when it is time to jump on or off that proverbial rocket "to da muun".

Go back on your meds. LOL.

[tspacepilot]

@Hippie Tech - I am not sure I am understanding the context of your quotes in relation to dooglus supporting ponzis.

These and the posts that followed depict how he manipulates people and/or their coins/ponzi.

The easymine/stakes, the fork and "the digger" are examples as to how he goes about his business.

I don't know if I understand either.  Are you saying that dooglus caused or was "the digger".  As I recall, that digging whale, as he was known, caused clam price to drop by an order of magnitude.  What would dooglus stand to gain by devaluing his own money by 90%?

The insiders almost never lose.

They ALWAYS know when it is time to jump on or off that proverbial rocket "to da muun".

So, that's a nice, cynical comment without much context.  As far as anyone knows, Dooglus, being the biggest holder of CLAM, took the biggest loss when the price dropped due to the whale digging.  If you're saying that he was the digger, then you're saying that he was crashing his own investment by selling so rapidly.  If you're saying he's some insider who knew about the digger, then you're saying that he took a huge loss while the digger sold.  I really think you're going to have to provide some further content to your cynicism if you want anyone else to understand whatever schemes you're imagining.

[Hippie Tech]

@Hippie Tech - I am not sure I am understanding the context of your quotes in relation to dooglus supporting ponzis.

These and the posts that followed depict how he manipulates people and/or their coins/ponzi.

The easymine/stakes, the fork and "the digger" are examples as to how he goes about his business.

I don't know if I understand either.  Are you saying that dooglus caused or was "the digger".  As I recall, that digging whale, as he was known, caused clam price to drop by an order of magnitude.  What would dooglus stand to gain by devaluing his own money by 90%?

Whether or not you're playing dumb or are honestly ignorant of the historical precidents/facts may one day be determined. lol eg. the insider bankers and traders have been buying back peoples' investments for pennies on the dollar for centuries.

The following screenie shows 12.5 months of CLAM's market activity on Poloniex. It begins with the first dug wallet, DOGE, and ends with "the digger" (or should I say "the CreativeDooger" ) going public.

After 9+ months of climbing steadily, the price crashed 5-10 days BEFORE the notso CreativeDooger appeared. Not after.

[Your Point Is Invalid]

@Hippie Tech - I am not sure I am understanding the context of your quotes in relation to dooglus supporting ponzis.

These and the posts that followed depict how he manipulates people and/or their coins/ponzi.

The easymine/stakes, the fork and "the digger" are examples as to how he goes about his business.

I don't know if I understand either.  Are you saying that dooglus caused or was "the digger".  As I recall, that digging whale, as he was known, caused clam price to drop by an order of magnitude.  What would dooglus stand to gain by devaluing his own money by 90%?

The insiders almost never lose.

They ALWAYS know when it is time to jump on or off that proverbial rocket "to da muun".

So, that's a nice, cynical comment without much context.  As far as anyone knows, Dooglus, being the biggest holder of CLAM, took the biggest loss when the price dropped due to the whale digging.  If you're saying that he was the digger, then you're saying that he was crashing his own investment by selling so rapidly.  If you're saying he's some insider who knew about the digger, then you're saying that he took a huge loss while the digger sold.  I really think you're going to have to provide some further content to your cynicism if you want anyone else to understand whatever schemes you're imagining.

You seem to be an expert in all things dooglus

[dooglus]

The following screenie shows 12.5 months of CLAM's market activity on Poloniex. It begins with the first dug wallet, DOGE, and ends with "the digger" (or should I say "the CreativeDooger" ) going public.

After 9+ months of climbing steadily, the price crashed 5-10 days BEFORE the notso CreativeDooger appeared. Not after.

So someone with 500k CLAMs started dumping after he saw that the price was starting to fall? That seems reasonable to me. He held as the price was going up, and decided to cash out when it started to fall.

You never actually make any claims, so it's impossible to argue with you, but are we to suppose that you think I am the same person as CreativeCuriosity (one of the original creators of CLAM), and that we're both the same person as the whale digger? "CreativeCuriosity + dooglus + digger = CreativeDooger" - very clever!

I know I'm neither of them, and I would put money of the other two also being different people.

I'm sure people would be interested to see any evidence you have of any of the three of us being the same person. Just stringing our names together doesn't count, sorry.

[HTML6]

Well this is just a tad melodramatic. If I helped someone with a script that would help robots enslave newborn babies I would have terrible morals but it doesn't mean I would enslave babies myself.

[dooglus]

Well this is just a tad melodramatic. If I helped someone with a script that would help robots enslave newborn babies I would have terrible morals but it doesn't mean I would enslave babies myself.

Until you can come up with proof that I am building a slave army of newborn babies I suggest you shut up about it.

Also (in an unrelated note) do you know where I can get good ear protection and bulk diaper supplies?

[cpfreeplz]

Well this is just a tad melodramatic. If I helped someone with a script that would help robots enslave newborn babies I would have terrible morals but it doesn't mean I would enslave babies myself.

Until you can come up with proof that I am building a slave army of newborn babies I suggest you shut up about it.

Also (in an unrelated note) do you know where I can get good ear protection and bulk diaper supplies?

OK well I've seen quite enough here. This is Dooglus' (partial) dox. He's the one in the red hat.



Do what you want with this (partial) dox everyone!

[IOTUSA]

Ha ha, some angsty geek flinging shit cause Dooglus fixed bugs? How do you have time for so much BS.

[Quickseller]

Ha ha, some angsty geek flinging shit cause Dooglus fixed bugs? How do you have time for so much BS.

I will just put this up for anyone to look at:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030

(a) Whoever—
--snip--

(2) intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains—

--snip--

(C) information from any protected computer;

--snip--

(5)

--snip--

(B) intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct, recklessly causes damage; or

--snip--

(7) with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any—
(A) threat to cause damage to a protected computer;

--snip--

(C) demand or request for money or other thing of value in relation to damage to a protected computer, where such damage was caused to facilitate the extortion;

--snip--

[suchmoon]

Ha ha, some angsty geek flinging shit cause Dooglus fixed bugs? How do you have time for so much BS.

I will just put this up for anyone to look at:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030

(a) Whoever—
--snip--

(2) intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains—

--snip--

(C) information from any protected computer;

--snip--

(5)

--snip--

(B) intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct, recklessly causes damage; or

--snip--

(7) with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any—
(A) threat to cause damage to a protected computer;

--snip--

(C) demand or request for money or other thing of value in relation to damage to a protected computer, where such damage was caused to facilitate the extortion;

--snip--

Ok, I'm gonna be the dumb donkey and ask - how is this relevant to anything? Is Dooglus now a hacker-extortionist?

[minifrij]

Ok, I'm gonna be the dumb donkey and ask - how is this relevant to anything? Is Dooglus now a hacker-extortionist?

Dooglus is the root of all evil, have you not heard? He finds vulnerabilities in hacks competitors sites to help them destroy them for his personal gain.

QS, when is the sequel of this thread being posted? Surely it doesn't take 2 months to compile all of the 'proof' that you already have into another thread.

[Quickseller]

Ok, I'm gonna be the dumb donkey and ask - how is this relevant to anything? Is Dooglus now a hacker-extortionist?

That is what I believe yes. I have spent some time compiling information, however it is now late. I will post information/proof tomorrow evening after spending a little more time on it.

Dooglus is the root of all evil, have you not heard? He finds vulnerabilities in hacks competitors sites to help them destroy them for his personal gain.

If a site does not have any kind of bug bounty program that invites people to find vulnerabilities in their site then finding such vulnerabilities would be accessing their computers without authorization. The question of personal gain is irrelevant to the question of accessing a computer system without authorization, although I do believe that dooglus does attempt to extort sites that he finds vulnerabilities to (that do not have bug bounty programs), and it often will make sense to pay the extortion due to his influence within the bitcoin gambling scene as well as the fact that it would probably not be smart to report him to law enforcement if you are a victim of his extortion because hosting a casino would probably be frowned upon by law enforcement.

   

QS, when is the sequel of this thread being posted? Surely it doesn't take 2 months to compile all of the 'proof' that you already have into another thread.

The consensus in this thread seems to be that it does not matter what dooglus has done and/or does, so I have not bothered to put in the effort into gathering evidence and writing up a new thread if my warnings are only going to be ignored and cause people to call me a troll which I do not appreciate. Many people who are strongly against ponzis and any kind of support of ponzis have turned a blind eye to this situation, and I do not think others will react any differently to dooglus's other less-then-honest actions.

[tspacepilot]

I will just put this up for anyone to look at:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030

IANAL, but, I heard that Dooglus lives in Canada.

QS, How do you have time for so much BS?

Now that is a question that has been defying answer for several years now.

The consensus in this thread ...

Is basically that your mudslinging tactics have failed.  No matter how many threads you start with your army of alts, you actually have to have some sort of content for your accusations to actually stick.

QS is like an experiment in echo-chamber crowd manipulation.  He makes a huge fuss and builds a hype machine with his alts, and people get riled up, but when you actually look for something concrete in what he's saying ...

[freedoge.co]

member with high rated reputation is in advantage, he "can afford" a couple of shady activities and no one is going to say a bad word about him. This is a good example of trust rating abuse going on here. Sorry QS but you have a really little chance to convince people to give negative to dooglus, that's how it goes even if you are right and have proof.

[dooglus]

member with high rated reputation is in advantage, he "can afford" a couple of shady activities and no one is going to say a bad word about him. This is a good example of trust rating abuse going on here. Sorry QS but you have a really little chance to convince people to give negative to dooglus, that's how it goes even if you are right and have proof.

I'm not sure what you're saying here. Are you accusing me of abusing the trust system in some way? I barely use the trust system other than for marking scammer and promoters of scams as being untrustworthy. I don't see how you can call that abusive.

This whole thread is complaining about how I fixed some publicly available code which was incorrectly determining the sending address of Bitcoin (or CLAM, as it happened to be in this particular instance) transactions. In balance I think such a change is a good think. People copy an paste open source code snippets for use in their own projects. It's better to fix bugs in open source code when you see them because you never know what project the code will find itself in next. Correcting errors I find online is habitual for me. If that constitutes "shade activity" then so be it. I'm not going to stop fixing errors wherever I see them.

[Quickseller]

Ok, I'm gonna be the dumb donkey and ask - how is this relevant to anything? Is Dooglus now a hacker-extortionist?

That is what I believe yes. I have spent some time compiling information, however it is now late. I will post information/proof tomorrow evening after spending a little more time on it.

1 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887220.0;all

--snip--
 So, we are adding mistaken Provably Fair system and there immediately comes a deposit from Dooglus. (he saw a mistake, he decided not to warn us about it immediately, but it still could be warned by Arrogant, he decided to use the bug to make 10 BTC from 0.1). After that happens he PM me with screens and ask for BTC for that bug.

--snip--


And so, for what he received the money? For cheating? Not of course. For bug finding? No, for bug, that could be found by everyone he deserved the maximum 0.2 BTC. He received his money for silence and only for this we gave him the money. And what he do immediately after receiving the money? Certainly tells all about our mistakes.

So I don't understand completely.. But it does sound kinda like blackmail, which I think is very unfair.. But I don't know the whole story, good luck to all parties

I told him about the exploit and asked what it was worth.

He suggested 0.2 BTC, I asked for 1 BTC. He agreed.

--snip--

I don't see where blackmail comes in to it.

--snip--

2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1106133.msg11780050

the admin of the site seems rather hostile and is trying to rip both me and dooglus off, demanding a lower bounty for the deal, i am entertaining offers in this thread or through pm regarding this. a percentage of this will be paid to dooglus for his help in confirming this issue.

3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=663326.msg9565937#msg9565937 http://archive.is/aggeL

I just received a PM:

Hi,
I added 1 Bitcoin to your PRC balance as a long overdue reward for helping with that bug.

Cheers

Dean

I'm not sure how to react, regarding the negative trust I previously left him.

I said it wasn't about the payment, but about the principle of the thing. Now that he's paid, if I leave the negative trust rating in place it seems like I'm punishing him unfairly. If I remove it, it seems like I was only trying to blackmail him after all.

As a compromise I'm changed it to a 'neutral' rating, so it's still visible for those who care to look, but doesn't contribute to the red warning sign next to all his posts. I hope that's the right thing to do...

Thanks Dean. I'm glad we sorted this out, and hope we can get on better in future.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=663326.msg9566912#msg9566912 http://archive.is/YEvjv

Doog isn't an unreasonable guy and the problem can in fact be solved easily when you [...]

[...] pay him off.

dooglus confirmed blackmail pro

--snip--

The dooglus thing isn't the full truth either.
I never once said I would give him a bug bounty and he never reported a bug to me.

I was asking him in pm about a bug and eventually he was able to figure out what was wrong and told me.

--snip--

notes
1 - I was not able to locate any kind of bug bounty program for this site, which means that using the exploit (even if a W/D was not attempted) was unauthorized. The way that dooglus described his interaction with this person sounds a lot like extortion to me.

2 - dooglus was not directly extorting the owners of crypto-games, however I believe he at the very least was acting as an accomplice, and appears to have been extorting them via proxy as it was announced that dooglus would receive a percentage of the proceeds

3 - This is not a hacking attempt as there was an invitation to find the bug, however it is a clear extortion attempt (not sure if "attempt is the correct word as it was successful), as no agreement for payment was ever made in any way, however dooglus left negative trust with the intention of strong-arming the owner of that site into paying dooglus money that he was not due.

This was high on the list of what to possibly make "chapter 2", however as mentioned above, I had not put very much effort into gathering evidence/information as it appears that people generally do not care about dooglus' past indiscretions. I may create a thread about dooglus' history of extortion this weekend (IIRC there are more examples of this....I just need to spend more time into [re]gathering information).   

[Hippie Tech]

Omf'ngee the casino had a bug just like everything else this noob gets his hands on ! lol

The mudderFUDder is strong in you Doogie..

Coincidences ?

[dooglus]

Omf'ngee the casino had a bug just like everything else this noob gets his hands on ! lol

The mudderFUDder is strong in you Doogie..

Coincidences ?

I see no coincidences here. Lots of Bitcoin gambling sites were buggy, and I helped to fix lots of them. I saw "were" because I no longer waste my time trying to help new sites. Experience shows that it almost never ends well.

As much as I hate feeding the troll, I guess I should respond to the 3 cases he mentioned:

1. The balloon site offered me a bounty when I reported their bug, but never paid it. I didn't do anything other than play their game to discover the bug. I published my interaction with the site owner. I wasn't extorting him. He offered a bounty freely, and later retracted the offer. The whole way he was running the site was scammy, offering payouts he wasn't bankrolled to be able to offer, etc.

2. The crypto-games site had a bug which someone else found. I never attempted to get a bounty for finding it, since I never found it. I remember the guy who did find it offering to share any bounty with me, but I don't remember ever asking for that, or ever receiving anything.

3. PRC had a bug bounty in place. I found a serious bug that was actively being exploited by an attacker and they took the longest time to pay the bounty. Note the winky face after the joke about "paying him off". That means it's a joke.