Why was my post unfairly deleted?

[PakistanHockeyfan]

Still, no proof. I see no proof anywhere as nothing was captured. Screencaps that could have been edited are not proof to me. I simply don't remember.

I do remember. I didn't edit the screenshot, why would I?

I also reported a few of your posts that were complete bullshit, spam, off topic, etc. Even in this thread you're asking a question that you won't accept any reasonable answer for. With behavior like that you're in no position to demand "proof".

If you really intend to contribute to the forum - stop wall-quoting, stop multi-posting, stop pretending you know things you have no clue about, stop derailing threads, stop posting paragraphs of nothing, stop getting offended when someone disagrees with you, basically stop being such a blindingly obvious trollspammer.

If you don't care, you don't have to post. Problem solved. Also, my posts in my history are not one liners or posts with no effort specifically. In the future, please web capture pages to solidify arguments as pages can easily be photoshopped/edited. Thank you.

https://archive.is/xSuAO#selection-1441.1-1751.66

Good enough for you?

No as it is not accurate. You highlight 2 sentenced posts but fail to realize that just as grue said, 2 sentence long posts don't mean your post is necessarily nonconstructive. Making your posts longer don't magically make them constructive either. You also fail to highlight the many long paragraph posts I've made on that same exact page.

[xetsr]

Might wanna use the edit button instead of double triple posting, unless you're trying to get posts deleted.

[PakistanHockeyfan]

Might wanna use the edit button instead of double posting, unless you're trying to get posts deleted.

I'm laying the posts out to make them more noticeable, and less confusing as to what is referring to what. Please tell me where it is against the rules to make "double posts". Doesn't matter anyway. I put everything in the OP.

[Zeke2345]

Might wanna use the edit button instead of double posting, unless you're trying to get posts deleted.

I'm laying the posts out to make them more noticeable, and less confusing as to what is referring to what. Please tell me where it is against the rules to make "double posts".

Its pretty obvious why you post in this manner and continuing on this thread after no one has agreed with you seems a bit foolish.
Learn to take criticism or you are going to have a rough go of things here. You may think you are right but the majority has spoken and you need to come to grips with that.
If you do not want to be seen as a signature spammer you should learn how to respond to people in one thread,rather then multiple back to back posts in one thread. It looks like a attempt to boost the post count rather than actually get to the heart of anything.

[PakistanHockeyfan]

Might wanna use the edit button instead of double posting, unless you're trying to get posts deleted.

I'm laying the posts out to make them more noticeable, and less confusing as to what is referring to what. Please tell me where it is against the rules to make "double posts".

Its pretty obvious why you post in this manner and continuing on this thread after no one has agreed with you seems a bit foolish.
Learn to take criticism or you are going to have a rough go of things here. You may think you are right but the majority has spoken and you need to come to grips with that.
If you do not want to be seen as a signature spammer you should learn how to respond to people in one thread,rather then multiple back to back posts in one thread. It looks like a attempt to boost the post count rather than actually get to the heart of anything.

That's your opinion. I'm not going to really take opinions from people who cannot voice opinions in a polite manner, call people foolish, stupid, and other rude comments. It's also difficult to tell when multiple accounts controlled by the same person trying to make their arguments towards other people plausible by supporting themselves in an illusion to make it seem like more people respect that opinion and agree with it.

[suchmoon]

No as it is not accurate. You highlight 2 sentenced posts but fail to realize that just as grue said, 2 sentence long posts don't mean your post is necessarily nonconstructive. Making your posts longer don't magically make them constructive either. You also fail to highlight the many long paragraph posts I've made on that same exact page.

Many of your long posts are even worse, same waffly nonsense repeated many times over.

Here is another example:

https://archive.is/xSuAO#selection-809.0-1469.113

You made 10 posts in less than 14 minutes. There is no chance you could have read the OP and at least a few preceding replies to grasp the context and make a constructive contribution in less than 90 seconds on average. At best you just looked at the thread title and fired away. Multiple examples like that in your post history, along with necro posting etc.

[Lutpin]

I've reported OP to hilarious some time ago.
I'm surprised they are still part of the YoBit campaign.

[PakistanHockeyfan]

No as it is not accurate. You highlight 2 sentenced posts but fail to realize that just as grue said, 2 sentence long posts don't mean your post is necessarily nonconstructive. Making your posts longer don't magically make them constructive either. You also fail to highlight the many long paragraph posts I've made on that same exact page.

Many of your long posts are even worse, same waffly nonsense repeated many times over.

Here is another example:

https://archive.is/xSuAO#selection-809.0-1469.113

You made 10 posts in less than 14 minutes. There is no chance you could have read the OP and at least a few preceding replies to grasp the context and make a constructive contribution in less than 90 seconds on average. At best you just looked at the thread title and fired away. Multiple examples like that in your post history, along with necro posting etc.

No, I did not. They are long posts, with thought involved. Grue said as long as it's on topic, and effort is in your post then everything is within the rules. In all honesty, if you have issues with me, I don't understand why. Also, if people have issues with signatures in general, don't have them. It doesn't make sense to have this tool where people like yourself get paranoid about a "signature spammer", even when a majority of my posts are long, and on topic.

[Lutpin]

Again, if you have issues with signature campaigns, request them to be removed.

I don't, I'm managing some myself.

If I was to get banned, I will just come back on a mule. For every account that'd get deleted, I'll come back on 10 to highlight the point that if people have such a big problem with signatures, they shouldn't have them in the first place. The site has dug their own hole with allowing that.

Nice attitude, mate.


Still, you shouldn't double-post.

[PakistanHockeyfan]

Again, if you have issues with signature campaigns, request them to be removed.

I don't, I'm managing some myself.

If I was to get banned, I will just come back on a mule. For every account that'd get deleted, I'll come back on 10 to highlight the point that if people have such a big problem with signatures, they shouldn't have them in the first place. The site has dug their own hole with allowing that.

Nice attitude, mate.


Still, you shouldn't double-post.

Prove where I have double posted recently via capture webpage please.

[Patatas]

my posts are long, on topic and usually have always been.

Wrong.Your posts are vague,absurd,forced to look like its on topic.For example :

Topic : Valve is about to accept bitcoin as their payment system

Your answer : It's not a big deal to me. There's tons of people accepting it nowadays.
^Wow,every creative,totally on topic.Contributes to the topic like never before .And ton's of people ? Seriously ?

Example 2: How to motivate women to use Bitcoin?

Your answer : Whether a man occupys BTC or a woman does, it is not going to matter.
^well then ,what matters ?And matters to bitcoin as in what ? or How ?

Example 3 : What would be Satoshi's opinion on blocksize debate ?

Your answer : He wouldn't have an opinion to share as he is rather anonymous and keeps to himself now.
^wtf did I just read ? You have no idea what you're talking about, Do you ?

You're correct,this is not Signature Spamming,this shit is full retards,completely other level stuff.

From what I can make out ,
1.You have no idea what bitcoin is or how it works.
2.You are simply posting for increasing your post counts without a slightest clue what it really means.
3.Stop focusing on Meta activities,hit yourself with the bitcoin documentation,maybe then you can bleed some legit bitcoin related posts .

[Lutpin]

Prove where I have double posted recently via capture webpage please.

Kidding? This very thread, right about my post.
http://archive.is/qpFIS#60%

No. You posted right before I made that quote and didn't see the post so I apologize. I didn't know "double posting" was against any rules as there are no official ones anyway. I will try to watch it. My mistake.

Yes. Also, check what xetsr wrote on the page earlier:

Might wanna use the edit button instead of double triple posting, unless you're trying to get posts deleted.

[PakistanHockeyfan]

my posts are long, on topic and usually have always been.

Wrong.Your posts are vague,absurd,forced to look like its on topic.For example :

Topic : Valve is about to accept bitcoin as their payment system

Your answer : It's not a big deal to me. There's tons of people accepting it nowadays.
^Wow,every creative,totally on topic.Contributes to the topic like never before .And ton's of people ? Seriously ?

Example 2: How to motivate women to use Bitcoin?

Your answer : Whether a man occupys BTC or a woman does, it is not going to matter.
^well then ,what matters ?And matters to bitcoin as in what ? or How ?

Example 3 : What would be Satoshi's opinion on blocksize debate ?

Your answer : He wouldn't have an opinion to share as he is rather anonymous and keeps to himself now.
^wtf did I just read ? You have no idea what you're talking about, Do you ?

You're correct,this is not Signature Spamming,this shit is full retards,completely other level stuff.

From what I can make out ,
1.You have no idea what bitcoin is or how it works.
2.You are simply posting for increasing your post counts without a slightest clue what it really means.
3.Stop focusing on Meta activities,hit yourself with the bitcoin documentation,maybe then you can bleed some legit bitcoin related posts .

I apologize if you have any issues with the way I word myself or comment on a topic, but I do recall of my posts still being very much on topic, long, and constructive so I just don't know what to say here.

Prove where I have double posted recently via capture webpage please.

Kidding? This very thread, right about my post.
http://archive.is/qpFIS#60%

No. You posted right before I made that quote and didn't see the post so I apologize. I didn't know "double posting" was against any rules as there are no official ones anyway. I will try to watch it. My mistake.