Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2019, 08:27:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Fix email validation!  (Read 776 times)
dree12
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1034



View Profile
February 08, 2013, 09:30:20 PM
 #1

SMF does not seem to support '+' symbols in email addresses. I attempted to put a "+bitcointalk" into my email address so that forum-related email could be filtered, but SMF rejected it.

Could this be fixed?
1561062435
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561062435

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561062435
Reply with quote  #2

1561062435
Report to moderator
COINSWITCH
Trade 300+ coins
No Login
No KYC
Get $5 on 1st order
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 5931


View Profile
February 09, 2013, 03:46:47 AM
 #2

It works for me.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
dree12
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1034



View Profile
February 09, 2013, 10:13:01 PM
 #3

It works for me.

Ah, it supports the raw plus sign but throws up when quotes and spaces are involved. I guess this issue is closed.

Regardless, it seems like a terrible idea to verify email addresses. If this is to prevent SQL injection, I'm sure there are many other ways to do it.
TradeFortress 🏕
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1023


View Profile
February 09, 2013, 10:42:08 PM
 #4

It works for me.

Ah, it supports the raw plus sign but throws up when quotes and spaces are involved. I guess this issue is closed.

Regardless, it seems like a terrible idea to verify email addresses. If this is to prevent SQL injection, I'm sure there are many other ways to do it.
Hmm? Email address can have spaces?
dree12
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1034



View Profile
February 09, 2013, 10:46:03 PM
 #5

It works for me.

Ah, it supports the raw plus sign but throws up when quotes and spaces are involved. I guess this issue is closed.

Regardless, it seems like a terrible idea to verify email addresses. If this is to prevent SQL injection, I'm sure there are many other ways to do it.
Hmm? Email address can have spaces?

I'm not an expert on this, but AFAIK anything before the @ is good as long as @, ", and \ are backslash-escaped and spaces are between quotes. However, it is extremely rare for email addresses to have @ or \ in them.

"John Doe"@john.doe.com is a valid email address format though, so it makes little sense to reject it.
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
February 09, 2013, 10:47:50 PM
 #6

It works for me.

Ah, it supports the raw plus sign but throws up when quotes and spaces are involved. I guess this issue is closed.

Regardless, it seems like a terrible idea to verify email addresses. If this is to prevent SQL injection, I'm sure there are many other ways to do it.
Hmm? Email address can have spaces?

I'm not an expert on this, but AFAIK anything before the @ is good as long as @, ", and \ are backslash-escaped and spaces are between quotes. However, it is extremely rare for email addresses to have @ or \ in them.

"John Doe"@john.doe.com is a valid email address format though, so it makes little sense to reject it.
no, this is against the RFC

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
dree12
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1034



View Profile
February 10, 2013, 01:11:26 AM
 #7

It works for me.

Ah, it supports the raw plus sign but throws up when quotes and spaces are involved. I guess this issue is closed.

Regardless, it seems like a terrible idea to verify email addresses. If this is to prevent SQL injection, I'm sure there are many other ways to do it.
Hmm? Email address can have spaces?

I'm not an expert on this, but AFAIK anything before the @ is good as long as @, ", and \ are backslash-escaped and spaces are between quotes. However, it is extremely rare for email addresses to have @ or \ in them.

"John Doe"@john.doe.com is a valid email address format though, so it makes little sense to reject it.
no, this is against the RFC

I've never personally had an email address like that, but I know people who did. Organizations in the day used quoted names as email addresses.

I guess even if the RFC bans it, people still use those addresses and they should not be banned.
21after2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 12



View Profile
February 10, 2013, 01:13:49 AM
 #8

It works for me.

Ah, it supports the raw plus sign but throws up when quotes and spaces are involved. I guess this issue is closed.

Regardless, it seems like a terrible idea to verify email addresses. If this is to prevent SQL injection, I'm sure there are many other ways to do it.
Hmm? Email address can have spaces?

I'm not an expert on this, but AFAIK anything before the @ is good as long as @, ", and \ are backslash-escaped and spaces are between quotes. However, it is extremely rare for email addresses to have @ or \ in them.

"John Doe"@john.doe.com is a valid email address format though, so it makes little sense to reject it.
no, this is against the RFC

I've never personally had an email address like that, but I know people who did. Organizations in the day used quoted names as email addresses.

I guess even if the RFC bans it, people still use those addresses and they should not be banned.

I've never seen an email address with a space in it. Hell, I didn't know it was possible. Learn something new every day, I suppose.
K1773R
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008


/dev/null


View Profile
February 10, 2013, 01:57:31 AM
 #9

It works for me.

Ah, it supports the raw plus sign but throws up when quotes and spaces are involved. I guess this issue is closed.

Regardless, it seems like a terrible idea to verify email addresses. If this is to prevent SQL injection, I'm sure there are many other ways to do it.
Hmm? Email address can have spaces?

I'm not an expert on this, but AFAIK anything before the @ is good as long as @, ", and \ are backslash-escaped and spaces are between quotes. However, it is extremely rare for email addresses to have @ or \ in them.

"John Doe"@john.doe.com is a valid email address format though, so it makes little sense to reject it.
no, this is against the RFC

I've never personally had an email address like that, but I know people who did. Organizations in the day used quoted names as email addresses.

I guess even if the RFC bans it, people still use those addresses and they should not be banned.

I've never seen an email address with a space in it. Hell, I didn't know it was possible. Learn something new every day, I suppose.
good to see, so my postfix got another spamfilter -> filtering emails from retards Tongue

[GPG Public Key]  [Devcoin Builds]  [BBQCoin Builds]  [Multichain Blockexplorer]  [Multichain Blockexplorer - PoS Coins]  [Ufasoft Miner Linux Builds]
BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM AK1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: NK1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: LKi773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: EK1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: bK1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!