FIXED - The Small Ponzi - 133% payout - max 3 ETH - no huge deposits - 3% fee

[TheSmallPonzi]

I've got this idea for some time already. It's really simple.

I got fed up of those pyramids that get quickly blocked by huge deposits,
so I've created The Small Ponzi.
It's really tiny and cute.

Rules are simple. You send your ETH to this address
0x1afd952269873fe009c7bdff5f07fd91605a7227
but there is a limit of max 3 ETH deposit.
You get back +33% of what you sent. The fee is set to 3%.

You can see how many people deposited here: http://etherscan.io/address/0x1afd952269873fe009c7bdff5f07fd91605a7227
Contract if of course verified and you can see it under the same addres.
I hope this pyramid will work safely and quickly due to those changes.

[omegaaf]

Didn't you just make this scam not too long ago?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1428382.0

[Tdecha]

the one with 33% fee ? still lmfao 

[TheSmallPonzi]

Yeah, there was mistake in the code. This was already fixed. If you have sent ETH to the contract PM me for reimbursements due to wrong fees.

[Dajackal]

Can anybody confirm the fee has been fixed?

[john312]

So is this legit? Can someone check the code?

[Qiuyue201]

Yeah, I guess it was fixed. There was error in the part of code below. "amount / 33" means the fee is the original amount send by sender divided by 33. It was 3 before, which meant original amount divided by 3, making it 33% before. I guess this was a typo.

 if (idx != 0) {
      collectedFees += amount / 33;
     owner.send(collectedFees);
     collectedFees = 0;
      balance += amount - amount / 33;

[Gunthar]

do you guys understand that despite your script cant stop to work you can still run away with the ETH in YOUR wallet, do you?
Or do you really think we are all going to "believe" that ETH ponzis are NOT ponzis scam? (oh wait...you guys use the term "legit ponzi"... )

[Qiuyue201]

The coins are protected by the contract so they can not run away with them in any way. That's the point of Ethereum pyramids.

[TheSmallPonzi]

Yes, the code has been fixed and the ponzi is working. You can see deposits and withdrawals here:
http://etherscan.io/address/0x1afd952269873fe009c7bdff5f07fd91605a7227

[Gunthar]

The coins are protected by the contract so they can not run away with them in any way. That's the point of Ethereum pyramids.

uhu....

Code:

modifier onlyowner { if (msg.sender == owner) _ }
...
function setOwner(address _owner) onlyowner {
      owner = _owner;

mind to explain who has the privkey and wallet pass of 0x6e05ce4aef57eb1db331477eaa3a4e8902ac052b
want me to copy/paste here ETH contracts already gone in scam or would you enjoy to search it by yourself? (search button by the help button )
nice try tho 

[DustBluster]

This is significantly closer to being honestly represented at least.

Still, your basic arithmetic is really failing you...

To get 3% of n you should multiply n by 0.03; not divide n by 33.

The difference is negligible in this case, but you should really get your math figured out.  And seriously, test your code on a testnet before publishing and announcing it.

[Gunthar]

This is significantly closer to being honestly represented at least.

Oh nice...so i am significantly closer to being honestly scammed with these kind of ponzies people attempt to run behind the fake claim that ETH contracts dont let you run away with _owner wallet coins?
 

[Dajackal]

y do u ppl bother with these scams.

[Katatsuki]

This is significantly closer to being honestly represented at least.

Oh nice...so i am significantly closer to being honestly scammed with these kind of ponzies people attempt to run behind the fake claim that ETH contracts dont let you run away with _owner wallet coins?
 

You're misunderstanding the code. The owner can't upload new functions to the app, only those already there can be used. Changing the owner only changes the person that the contract belongs to, so for example it would allow a new person to change settings or get the returns from the fees, but unless there was some malicious bit of code when it was first uploaded, the owner can't touch the contract's funds. The contract itself is some sort of wallet that can only be accessed through programmed functions.

That being said, people will try anything to sneakily introduce something in the program that will let them steal from users. That's why it's very important to inspect the code carefully a few times before participating, and not listen to anything people say. Many fake accounts around that just try to lure people.

[Gunthar]

The owner can't upload new functions to the app, only those already there can be used. Changing the owner only changes the person that the contract belongs to, so for example it would allow a new person to change settings or get the returns from the fees, but unless there was some malicious bit of code when it was first uploaded, the owner can't touch the contract's funds. The contract itself is some sort of wallet that can only be accessed through programmed functions.

That being said, people will try anything to sneakily introduce something in the program that will let them steal from users. That's why it's very important to inspect the code carefully a few times before participating, and not listen to anything people say. Many fake accounts around that just try to lure people.

still this aint answered:

mind to explain who has the privkey and wallet pass of 0x6e05ce4aef57eb1db331477eaa3a4e8902ac052b

So, who owns those keys? The "owner"? HENCE >>> can run away with ETH whenever they want and without the need to add any function.