Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 05:14:27 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Libertarian Party of Texas to Store Election Results On Three Blockchains  (Read 497 times)
BayAreaCoins (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250


Owner at AltQuick.com


View Profile WWW
April 08, 2016, 08:12:14 PM
 #1

http://www.coindesk.com/libertarian-party-texas-logs-votes-presidential-electors-blockchain/

https://AltQuick.com/exchange/ - Trade altcoins & Bitcoin Testnet coins with real Bitcoin. Fast, private, and easy!
https://AltQuick.com/Faucet/ Load your AltQuick exchange account with free Bitcoins & Testnet every 10 minutes.
chennan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1004


View Profile
April 08, 2016, 11:04:59 PM
 #2

Interesting...

But I don't see where this "florincoin" comes into play... I'm just assuming it's a fork of the normal Bitcoin blockchain?  I just briefly skimmed the article and it didn't seem to address the issue of who is going to be putting in the resources to do the hashing... that will honestly be the biggest concern of voter fraud if there are only a few people/government doing the hashing. 

I guess it's hard for me to imagine creating an incentive for a lot of people to put energy and time into hashing something that doesn't hold monetary value... I guess I just look at this kind of thing more realistically.  It's a great concept though nontheless if it does end up working out.

BayAreaCoins (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250


Owner at AltQuick.com


View Profile WWW
April 08, 2016, 11:35:06 PM
 #3

Interesting...

But I don't see where this "florincoin" comes into play... I'm just assuming it's a fork of the normal Bitcoin blockchain?  I just briefly skimmed the article and it didn't seem to address the issue of who is going to be putting in the resources to do the hashing... that will honestly be the biggest concern of voter fraud if there are only a few people/government doing the hashing. 

I guess it's hard for me to imagine creating an incentive for a lot of people to put energy and time into hashing something that doesn't hold monetary value... I guess I just look at this kind of thing more realistically.  It's a great concept though nontheless if it does end up working out.

Florincoin was the first coin to allow for text to be directly saved into the blockchain.  It's an "old" coin from 2013.  I think the purpose of using it along with BTC and their own private blockchain is just to have a third blockchain to check the other two against for future reference.

I honestly not sure though.

https://AltQuick.com/exchange/ - Trade altcoins & Bitcoin Testnet coins with real Bitcoin. Fast, private, and easy!
https://AltQuick.com/Faucet/ Load your AltQuick exchange account with free Bitcoins & Testnet every 10 minutes.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4396
Merit: 4755



View Profile
April 08, 2016, 11:51:26 PM
 #4

firstly, the OPs article is not about voting using the blockchain.

this is about storing standard ballot results AFTER they are voted the old fashioned way(paper ballots), AFTER they are counted the old fashioned way. then later uploaded onto a database that multiple people have.

its not a chain its not even endless transactions needing confirmation.. its just decentralised database.

nothing more.

you might aswell get 100+ people to start their own separate texas websites and upload the archived results to those. because (apart from the the cost of domain/server) there is no real difference once you remove the buzzwords

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
BayAreaCoins (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250


Owner at AltQuick.com


View Profile WWW
April 09, 2016, 12:09:35 AM
 #5

firstly, the OPs article is not about voting using the blockchain.

I don't think anyone said it was about voting using the blockchain.

you might aswell get 100+ people to start their own separate texas websites and upload the archived results to those. because (apart from the the cost of domain/server) there is no real difference once you remove the buzzwords

How does getting 100 people starting their own central website comparable to using decentralized blockchains storing results?

I'm sure 100 websites get pwned a day.  I haven't seen any of the blockchains get rekt yet today.

https://AltQuick.com/exchange/ - Trade altcoins & Bitcoin Testnet coins with real Bitcoin. Fast, private, and easy!
https://AltQuick.com/Faucet/ Load your AltQuick exchange account with free Bitcoins & Testnet every 10 minutes.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4396
Merit: 4755



View Profile
April 09, 2016, 12:19:45 AM
 #6

im talking about "their private blockchain"

id say much easier to just put it on the bitcoin blockchain as a message.. and thats it. the private blockchain they have is meaningless vs a global decentralized system

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
alani123
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1508



View Profile
April 09, 2016, 12:38:44 AM
 #7

Quote
The idea is that after the balloting is collected, the records will be uploaded to the blockchain for future generations and accountability.
http://www.coindesk.com/libertarian-party-texas-logs-votes-presidential-electors-blockchain/

I'm fine with this but it's not as exciting as other potential applications would be. If there was a way to verify each vote individually other than just use the blockchain to archive the result after counting this would have been more of a significant event.

███████████████████████████
███████▄████████████▄██████
████████▄████████▄████████
███▀█████▀▄███▄▀█████▀███
█████▀█▀▄██▀▀▀██▄▀█▀█████
███████▄███████████▄███████
███████████████████████████
███████▀███████████▀███████
████▄██▄▀██▄▄▄██▀▄██▄████
████▄████▄▀███▀▄████▄████
██▄███▀▀█▀██████▀█▀███▄███
██▀█▀████████████████▀█▀███
███████████████████████████
 
 Duelbits 
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██

██

██

██

██
TRY OUR UNIQUE GAMES!
    ◥ DICE  ◥ MINES  ◥ PLINKO  ◥ DUEL POKER  ◥ DICE DUELS   
█▀▀











█▄▄
 
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀

███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
 
███
▀▀▀

███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
 
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀

███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
 
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀

███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
 
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀

███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀
███
▀▀▀

███
▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
 KENONEW 
 
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀█











▄▄█
10,000x
 
MULTIPLIER
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██

██

██

██

██
 
NEARLY
UP TO
50%
REWARDS
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

██

██

██

██

██
[/tabl
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4396
Merit: 4755



View Profile
April 09, 2016, 12:44:07 AM
 #8

but it's not as exciting as other potential applications would be. If there was a way to verify each vote individually other than just use the blockchain to archive the result after counting this would have been more of a significant event.

exactly

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
chennan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1004


View Profile
April 09, 2016, 12:50:19 AM
 #9

Quote
The idea is that after the balloting is collected, the records will be uploaded to the blockchain for future generations and accountability.
http://www.coindesk.com/libertarian-party-texas-logs-votes-presidential-electors-blockchain/

I'm fine with this but it's not as exciting as other potential applications would be. If there was a way to verify each vote individually other than just use the blockchain to archive the result after counting this would have been more of a significant event.

I think this would not only just be exciting, but yet a huge success of revolutionizing the shadiness of elections.  Also, from what I gathered from the article was that they are doing the "old fashioned" method of using paper ballots, but also scanning and uploading the results on florincoin and also, I guess, "test" if it's possible to hash out the results on a private bitcoin blockchain?

Quote
To make the idea of using a blockchain less daunting to the convention attendees, paper ballots will be used to actually mark the votes. Each ballot will then be digitally uploaded using two scanners with a third back-up using BTC’s patent-pending technology.

Published in January of this year, the patent application for the voting machine describes how the device uses private keys to digitally sign voting data and broadcast the results along with a public key to the distributed network. The signed voting data is then stored with its public key on a blockchain database managed by the voting machines.

BayAreaCoins (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250


Owner at AltQuick.com


View Profile WWW
April 09, 2016, 12:54:41 AM
 #10

im talking about "their private blockchain"

id say much easier to just put it on the bitcoin blockchain as a message.. and thats it. the private blockchain they have is meaningless vs a global decentralized system

Ah ok I'm following you now.

https://AltQuick.com/exchange/ - Trade altcoins & Bitcoin Testnet coins with real Bitcoin. Fast, private, and easy!
https://AltQuick.com/Faucet/ Load your AltQuick exchange account with free Bitcoins & Testnet every 10 minutes.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4396
Merit: 4755



View Profile
April 09, 2016, 01:21:47 AM
Last edit: April 09, 2016, 01:57:12 AM by franky1
 #11

im talking about "their private blockchain"

id say much easier to just put it on the bitcoin blockchain as a message.. and thats it. the private blockchain they have is meaningless vs a global decentralized system

Ah ok I'm following you now.

yep. their description of "The signed voting data is then stored with its public key on a blockchain database managed by the voting machines." is just a couple of machines.. thus not even as secure as anything that is truly a blockchain.

its like he is playing on the bitcoin fame to sell a couple crappy computers to the state, while also getting a long term contract to maintain the couple of computers, all of which have nothing to do with a true blockchain

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!