Bought bitcoin talk accounts

[dankem]

Can these be tagged red? If the person goes from A+ english writing a few years back to F- english currently? I think I know a few

[1714899970]

1714899970

[1714899970]

1714899970

[1714899970]

1714899970

[1714899970]

1714899970

[mcb1221]

No, Bought accounts need not to be red tagged until they are in hands of a crook or are hacked one.

[Lutpin]

First off, this is hardly a scam accusation.

Can these be tagged red?

Everyone 'can' be given red trust.
If you ask whether defualt trust users will do that, most of them don't leave negative trust to sold accounts.
(it might be different when the account had green trust before being sold)

If the person goes from A+ english writing a few years back to F- english currently?

That's a strong indication, but can't be definite proof.

I think I know a few

I think everyone knows a few.
I also think I know the user you're talking about.

No, Bought accounts need not to be red tagged until they are in hands of a crook or are hacked one.

To be fair, you're hardly the one to listen to in this case, writing from a bought account.

[TheChang]

Can these be tagged red? If the person goes from A+ english writing a few years back to F- english currently? I think I know a few

give me -red for not reason he is sick in head scammer himself you bought it

[dankem]

Can these be tagged red? If the person goes from A+ english writing a few years back to F- english currently? I think I know a few

doit you givied me negative no reason sick in head no more  

Why are you in here, you have a scam accusation you need to reply to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429652.msg14477331#msg14477331

[Joel_Jantsen]

doit you givied me negative no reason sick in head no more 

On the brighter side,you do deserve a negative trust if those those untrusted feedbacks are true.Selling of not working MSDN keys is illegal or selling of any keys is illegal.

[DarkStar_]

I don't think they should be tagged red, unless they have DT green. Then they should be tagged with a neg to offset the +trust that the person did not earn. A simple neutral should suffice, stating that the person should treat this user as a new account/disregard previous trust ratings. If all bought accounts got tagged, the Lending section will be affected quite a bit since many loans use their accounts as collateral. Also, there would be no point buying accounts if they were going to be tagged.

[onlinedragon]

Since they aloud selling accounts on this forum it will be unfair to tag them all red. I think it start with stop aloud selling accounts and  who sold on other websites will be blocked. Some are selling now accounts with high green trust to some buyers without good intentions.

[xetsr]

Since they aloud selling accounts on this forum it will be unfair to tag them all red. I think it start with stop aloud selling accounts and  who sold on other websites will be blocked. Some are selling now accounts with high green trust to some buyers without good intentions.

It's being allowed for a reason. Please remind me, why is that?

[Slowturtleinc]

Since they aloud selling accounts on this forum it will be unfair to tag them all red. I think it start with stop aloud selling accounts and  who sold on other websites will be blocked. Some are selling now accounts with high green trust to some buyers without good intentions.

It's being allowed for a reason. Please remind me, why is that?

Because it is impossible to stop. Cracking down here makes little difference and most likely would increase value.

[btvGainer]

Can these be tagged red? If the person goes from A+ english writing a few years back to F- english currently? I think I know a few

Just because someone's English is not good,he can not be given neg ratings.You will see even abusive language and insulting,provocative remarks and posts are ignored here.Red ratings are given to scammers or potential scammers

[dankem]

back in 2013 i used online grammar checker for my posts i not bought my account i not care about sr member or newbie tomorrow i remove all my posts to be newbie again i started and now is back to full member

Why'd you delete your posts, thats shady


And not just change in writing style but other tells

[Slowturtleinc]

back in 2013 i used online grammar checker for my posts i not bought my account i not care about sr member or newbie tomorrow i remove all my posts to be newbie again i started and now is back to full member

Why'd you delete your posts, thats shady


And not just change in writing style but other tells

Most likely covering up the fact that this account was bought,can not see any other reason to erase threads and rewrite them after the discussion has ended.
Its not like people are going to dredge up old threads to reopen the discussion enough to make it worth well. On top of the responses not making any sense.
Seems shady but he has also done some things that raised my eyebrow in lending,so this does not shock me.

[Syntax-Error]

back in 2013 i used online grammar checker for my posts i not bought my account i not care about sr member or newbie tomorrow i remove all my posts to be newbie again i started and now is back to full member

Why'd you delete your posts, thats shady


And not just change in writing style but other tells

Checked some feedback you give out here you have any brain damage?

[notlist3d]

back in 2013 i used online grammar checker for my posts i not bought my account i not care about sr member or newbie tomorrow i remove all my posts to be newbie again i started and now is back to full member

Why'd you delete your posts, thats shady


And not just change in writing style but other tells

Most likely covering up the fact that this account was bought,can not see any other reason to erase threads and rewrite them after the discussion has ended.
Its not like people are going to dredge up old threads to reopen the discussion enough to make it worth well. On top of the responses not making any sense.
Seems shady but he has also done some things that raised my eyebrow in lending,so this does not shock me.

Can't click on quote appears it might have been deleted.  It is extremely shady but buying an account is not against rules (I'm not pro buying accounts I will admit).  Even deleting history is not against rules, just shows it was bought almost always unless they deleted for was part of scam or something.

What he might get in trouble for is unsubstantial posts with signature - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=51057;sa=showPosts look at all one liners and small posts.  It's marginal where its not a total crap post... but a lot of small ones. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1430887.msg14481491#msg14481491 is perfect example. So who knows.

[Slowturtleinc]

He deleted it within a 20-30 minutes window of posting it but I noticed the spam as well. Was going to call him on it in lending because he was acting like we going to lend to a newbie account but kept asking why he needed such a small amount! Next day he applies for a loan of the same amount after making a big issue of how small the amount was. Notice a few accounts do that in the lending section with signature spam.
Now that he has deleted the comment it just makes him stand out more like a sore thumb,if I recall this account was lost in a default loan last year but not to sure.
The name stands out to me for some reason,will have to go back and look.

[dankem]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=371399 skeletonbit , did you also use a online grammer checker before april 11th this year? Please explain yourself