eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
February 13, 2013, 01:58:35 AM |
|
I for one welcome our new terahash ASIC-powered overlords.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
Beyondo
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
February 13, 2013, 02:56:56 AM |
|
What is thy bidding, my hashmaster? What, shut off my GPU Miners because they're slowing down the pool....oh, ok, I'll get right on that
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 13, 2013, 03:28:33 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
creativex
|
|
February 13, 2013, 03:48:21 AM |
|
K spill it man! Which Chinese benefactors are these? ASICMiner right?
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 13, 2013, 05:44:34 AM |
|
K spill it man! Which Chinese benefactors are these? ASICMiner right? Only if they're starting slow. They're supposed to have 12 Thps up their wide oriental sleeves.
|
|
|
|
dstriker
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
February 13, 2013, 07:51:31 AM |
|
I hope that's me one day.
|
|
|
|
Joshwaa
|
|
February 13, 2013, 02:19:59 PM |
|
Can you tell us what equipment he is using?
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 13, 2013, 05:19:15 PM |
|
Question: wouldn't 1TH (or 4-5% of the network) be enough to justify solo mining?
|
|
|
|
Sitarow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
|
February 13, 2013, 05:29:08 PM Last edit: February 13, 2013, 07:28:24 PM by Sitarow |
|
Question: wouldn't 1TH (or 4-5% of the network) be enough to justify solo mining?
Seems every device being added increases speed by 250 and is now at 1.3TH Edit: it is at 1.5TH as of 12pm MST 2/13/2013
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3416
Merit: 4831
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
February 13, 2013, 06:14:43 PM |
|
wow
finally
|
This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable. Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
February 13, 2013, 08:40:08 PM |
|
that's bullish.
|
|
|
|
Gabit
|
|
February 13, 2013, 09:30:08 PM |
|
Question: wouldn't 1TH (or 4-5% of the network) be enough to justify solo mining?
Seems every device being added increases speed by 250 and is now at 1.3TH Edit: it is at 1.5TH as of 12pm MST 2/13/2013 That would actually mach my calculations... as in 1 (unit) x 10 boards x 64 x 355MH/chips = 227,2GHash (ASICMINER). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.1480.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 13, 2013, 10:32:32 PM |
|
Question: wouldn't 1TH (or 4-5% of the network) be enough to justify solo mining?
There's still a lot af variance. At 1Thps and 3 300 000 Difficulty, you'd expected to see ~ 6 blocks per day. But for such a small number the variance will be quite large - standard deviation of blocks per unit time is proportional to square root of of the average, so the smaller the average, the larger the standard deviation is in proportion. In this case we can say that for the above parameters, in 95 days out of 100 the number of blocks per day will be more than 2 and less than 11. If you're relying on 6 blocks per day, that could be a problem. OTOH if you can wait a month for the earnings to stabilise, and if your proportion of the network doesn't change, then for 95 months out of 100 you'll have ~ 150 to 210 blocks per month. Simply put, the variance is going to be quite large. If you don't want more than (for example) expected +/- 5% variability (of blocks found in a given time period), then you'll want to be expecting about 1500 blocks in that given time period. So even if you have half the network, the time to reduce variability to within 5% of the mean will still be about 3 weeks. PPS pools are already very familiar with this bit of maths.
|
|
|
|
repentance
|
|
February 14, 2013, 05:36:29 AM |
|
Read it and weep.
|
All I can say is that this is Bitcoin. I don't believe it until I see six confirmations.
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
February 14, 2013, 07:27:49 AM |
|
Unless you ordered before august, you won't see difficulty under 10,000,000 when your ASIC arrives.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 14, 2013, 07:36:06 AM |
|
Unless you ordered before august, you won't see difficulty under 10,000,000 when your ASIC arrives.
You base this on what? Please show working.
|
|
|
|
shmadz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
@theshmadz
|
|
February 15, 2013, 12:38:37 AM |
|
this "mega-miner" is now above 2.2 TH - unless he somehow has roughly 35 Avalon devices, I'm guessing that this is ASICminer now online and steadily ramping up production. even without adding those 12 estimated TH to OOC's charts it looks like we should go past 10 million sometime in early march. I suspect that it's possible that some of the people who got in on the second batch of Avalons might get theirs before march, (though I still haven't seen much evidence of batch one) but I highly doubt that any bfl orders placed after July 31 will arrive before the 10 million mark. I'm expecting to receive my ASIC (which was ordered very late) on exactly my birthday (an undisclosed day in May) And I'd be ecstatic if the difficulty were still below 100 million! (OOC's charts say we should be around 30 mil by that point, but those are long range forecasts and have a pretty high degree of uncertainty at this point) @OOC: -btw, any idea when we might expect updated charts?
|
"You have no moral right to rule us, nor do you possess any methods of enforcement that we have reason to fear." - John Perry Barlow, 1996
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
February 15, 2013, 12:48:18 AM |
|
this "mega-miner" is now above 2.2 TH - unless he somehow has roughly 35 Avalon devices, I'm guessing that this is ASICminer now online and steadily ramping up production. even without adding those 12 estimated TH to OOC's charts it looks like we should go past 10 million sometime in early march. I suspect that it's possible that some of the people who got in on the second batch of Avalons might get theirs before march, (though I still haven't seen much evidence of batch one) but I highly doubt that any bfl orders placed after July 31 will arrive before the 10 million mark. I'm expecting to receive my ASIC (which was ordered very late) on exactly my birthday (an undisclosed day in May) And I'd be ecstatic if the difficulty were still below 100 million! (OOC's charts say we should be around 30 mil by that point, but those are long range forecasts and have a pretty high degree of uncertainty at this point) @OOC: -btw, any idea when we might expect updated charts? It has been confirmed this miner on BTC Guild is ASICMINER. So far there have only been two high profile confirmations of any Avalon units (Bitcoin Foundation and Jeff Garzik).
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
February 15, 2013, 06:18:35 AM |
|
@OOC: -btw, any idea when we might expect updated charts?
Hey shmadz, I've got a family emergency atm. I have the second part of the "Weekend Dip" trading strategy posts lined up and ready to publish, and I'll have time for the usual weekly posts. I'll try to make time for the next "ASIC choices" post soonish, and definitely before the next retarget. Sorry it can't be sooner. It will consist of bitcoin earnings, difficulty, and cumulative cost per day, to make it more relevant to more people, and for longer (especially since I have no idea what btc will do). /OT (apologies to eleuthria)
|
|
|
|
lunarboy
|
|
July 10, 2013, 04:17:30 PM |
|
With only 4 or 5 main companies producing ASCI chips The future of mining seems very centralised and in my opinion is the biggest danger bitcoin currently faces. 1 CPU 1 Vote that was the initial idea but the reality is far from that now. can anyone point me to threads with decent discussion on how to prevent this nearly fatal flaw in the bitcoin protocol. Dan Kaminsky predicts that the current proof-of-work function isn’t going to be used by the end of the year — he assigns 0% probability it’s going to be used if this is indeed the serious problem many believe it is what is the solution.? how do we restore the power to the individual 'average computer user' now that the network is already in the hands of the few big asci producers, and their army of pre orders and hence already deeply invested followers who have essentially bought their dominating vote of the bitcoin network?
|
|
|
|
|