Phew, I thought Professor Bitcorn had dug his reputation out of the gutter for a mo there, different Williams.
Lol, he should probably have put a disclaimer at the very top stating he has a vested interest in his point of view but it kind of goes without saying
He should really wake up and smell the coffee though, the "terrorism" line is way down the curve of diminishing returns at this stage and getting to the point where the general public is more inclined to research what's being targeted by it than blindly run away in terror. That's something the fed really don't need because folks are already wondering how far this exclusion of anyone "we" don't like from the financial system will go, whether it will extend to their own personal transactions at some stage and the answer they'll find is a loud and clear "yes it will".
It could also extend to something the fed should be absolutely terrified of and that's their supposed right to decide who can and can't use their system because that raises the question of what exactly is it the fed is running? Whatever it is, it sure ain't money because there's absolutely no scope whatsoever for exclusion in its definition:
http://money.visualcapitalist.com/infographic-the-properties-of-money/
