Mods editing chat wow -

[iCEBREAKER]

LOL

You fail to realize that you can deduce people's feelings on a matter based on their actions.

Ever hear of the phrase: "ACTIONS speak louder than WORDS"?

Once again you fail.

OK smoothie, based on your actions, here is my deduction of your feelings:

[smoothie]

LOL

You fail to realize that you can deduce people's feelings on a matter based on their actions.

Ever hear of the phrase: "ACTIONS speak louder than WORDS"?

Once again you fail.

OK smoothie, based on your actions, here is my deduction of your feelings:

You are entitled to you own opinion and views lol.

The facts remain, you make a statement, I prove you wrong, then you divert lol....keep backpedaling it suits you   

[iCEBREAKER]

You are entitled to you own opinion and views lol.

The facts remain, you make a statement, I prove you wrong, then you divert lol....keep backpedaling it suits you   

This is like the time you freaked out over a silver bar that had a less than obvious marking and foolishly claimed it was made of copper or something. 

The fact is you are once again getting butthurt over nothing other than your own malignant assumptions.

There is zero evidence indicating that BTC-E is anything other than a heavily used, successful, competent, and honest broker.

No need for me to backpedal.  You never answered my original question.   

Why not take your suspicions to the Bitcoin Police?

OMG smoothie haz butthurt?
I'll be there right away!

[laughingbear]

Zero evidence?  have you read ANY of these threads? 

please post more of the read head, i like her

[smoothie]

You are entitled to you own opinion and views lol.

The facts remain, you make a statement, I prove you wrong, then you divert lol....keep backpedaling it suits you   

This is like the time you freaked out over a silver bar that had a less than obvious marking and foolishly claimed it was made of copper or something. 

The fact is you are once again getting butthurt over nothing other than your own malignant assumptions.

There is zero evidence indicating that BTC-E is anything other than a heavily used, successful, competent, and honest broker.

No need for me to backpedal.  You never answered my original question.   

LOL so how much NVC have you bought? Given you like to divert attention every time you are proven wrong.

[crazy_rabbit]

And you don't think for one second that BTC-e felt bad for getting the 110k NVC is why they just destroyed it? Try harder to make it seem that I ALWAYS troll.

I do post to get users to be wary of shady services and operations.

I have no idea how BTC-e feels about premined NVC.  Neither do you.

Why not take your suspicions to the Bitcoin Police?  I'm sure they'll be very concerned!   

"Balthazar, you are in violation of the Smoothie Altcoin Act of 2013. 
Put down the NovaCoins and come out with your hands up!"

Well, so far this hasn't made it to the Scam Accusations board on here, I think if it did there would be serious problems for BTC-E. For example, I'm sure BitInstant would think twice about working with them. They are an American company that has to seriously watch their back concerning AML. The idea that there is an insider scandal going on would definitely make them reconsider working with them.

[laughingbear]

I am seriously considering making an official scam thread, but one of the last pieces I am trying to place is can the claim of coin destruction be proven?

[crazy_rabbit]

I am seriously considering making an official scam thread, but one of the last pieces I am trying to place is can the claim of coin destruction be proven?

Yes the claim of coin destruction can be proven. However someone else mentioned there are still 90K in premined coins left, which by the benefit of now having reduced the total number of coins in existence by 110K, are now even more valuable. Ironic.

[laughingbear]

I am seriously considering making an official scam thread, but one of the last pieces I am trying to place is can the claim of coin destruction be proven?

Yes the claim of coin destruction can be proven. However someone else mentioned there are still 90K in premined coins left, which by the benefit of now having reduced the total number of coins in existence by 110K, are now even more valuable. Ironic.

How? can you show me?

[crazy_rabbit]

I am seriously considering making an official scam thread, but one of the last pieces I am trying to place is can the claim of coin destruction be proven?

Yes the claim of coin destruction can be proven. However someone else mentioned there are still 90K in premined coins left, which by the benefit of now having reduced the total number of coins in existence by 110K, are now even more valuable. Ironic.

How? can you show me?

In the post where BTC-E claims to destroy it, they show the steps you need to take to prove that it was destroyed. Basically they sent it to a valid NVC address, for which there is no valid private key. Meaning, no one could ever redeem the coins, they will sit forever in one place on the blockchain. It is somewhat similar to sending coins to an address by accident, but an address that no-one owns, thus no one will ever have the private key for. In this case, they needed to prove that no one has the the private key to this address first, so they create a public key that is valid, but is a public key that no private key would generate. If I understand correctly.

[laughingbear]

I read all that, but I still want proof.

Can I see this in a blockchain?

In they end, they say they sent it to an address, can I see proof they sent it at all?  Can I see proof that no one actually owns the address?

I admit that this part of the story may be legit, I just want to be able to see it, and I cant find where to view the blockchain