Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2024, 03:11:21 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin First Transaction?  (Read 2953 times)
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074


View Profile
October 01, 2016, 02:15:39 PM
 #21

every block has a "coinbase". which is the reward payment/ coin creation log. no "spending" occurs

however a transaction between two people "spending" funds. is different.
the first transaction to spend funds happened at block 170.

their were many other transactions since then. but the notable one where a transaction occured with a real world result of the spender getting pizza for their bitcoin happened here
https://blockchain.info/tx/49d2adb6e476fa46d8357babf78b1b501fd39e177ac7833124b3f67b17c40c2a

Yes Franky1, I want to agree with you on that one... a transaction in my opinion is not just the transfer of some bitcoin from one adress

to another. The value in the transaction for me, is if value is appended to the deal. You transferred bitcoin to someone and you received

something in return. { service or goods } A tx feels empty without some value changing hands. I know a lot of people would disagree with

me on this, but this is how I perceive it.  Wink

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4410
Merit: 4770



View Profile
October 01, 2016, 04:07:37 PM
 #22

every block has a "coinbase". which is the reward payment/ coin creation log. no "spending" occurs

however a transaction between two people "spending" funds. is different.
the first transaction to spend funds happened at block 170.

their were many other transactions since then. but the notable one where a transaction occured with a real world result of the spender getting pizza for their bitcoin happened here
https://blockchain.info/tx/49d2adb6e476fa46d8357babf78b1b501fd39e177ac7833124b3f67b17c40c2a

Yes Franky1, I want to agree with you on that one... a transaction in my opinion is not just the transfer of some bitcoin from one adress

to another. The value in the transaction for me, is if value is appended to the deal. You transferred bitcoin to someone and you received

something in return. { service or goods } A tx feels empty without some value changing hands. I know a lot of people would disagree with

me on this, but this is how I perceive it.  Wink

kind of
but here is my opinion:
a coinbase:
is not a transaction as its not a movement of funds, its a creation of funds.
EG the coinbase of every block is not a transaction.

a transaction:
involves spending/sending funds from one address to another.. even if its sending it to yourself for testing purposes its a transaction
even if its sending to another persons address for testing purposes its a transaction.
EG the first transaction was in block 170

a trade:
which involves a transaction that then results in goods/services in return offchain, is a trade
EG there were many 'testing' transactions after block 170 and before block 57035, but the first notable trade.. (publicly announced) transaction that results in goods/services in return offchain was the one i linked. in block 57035

however the buzzwords of trade vs transaction are now irrelevant because no one publicly announces what the purpose of a transaction is. so the word trade, has little to no meaning. and we just define it as the same now.

but in the context of the OP's question regarding bitcoin 'firsts' its best to try using more descriptive words to get the OP better answers

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
SmartIphone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 01, 2016, 04:11:05 PM
 #23

franky1, what happens with the funds on this address https://blockchain.info/address/12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX ?
Since these funds are counted as coinbase transaction then these funds are not real or can not be spend even those funds that came after a year or more?
Bitcoinsummoner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 624


Maintain Social Distance, Stay safe.


View Profile WWW
October 01, 2016, 04:17:27 PM
 #24

It was between Hal Finney and Satoshi. I'm sure someone can point out the link on the blockchain.

EDIT: Here it is: https://blockexplorer.com/block-index/170

OMG 400K Confirmations Shocked. Thanks for information bro.
IIRC most blocks after a block (if not every block) basically verifies the transaction and that's why older transactions can have insane amounts of verification under them. So if you really want to make sure that there was a secure transactions, just wait a few years and it should hit 1k confirmations pretty soon.

That's completely unnecessary, of course, however it's an interesting thought experiment.
Yeah i agree because i seen my old transaction to the present transaction they have different counted confirmation ..
But the question why this is happening.

█████████████████████████
████████▀▀████▀▀█▀▀██████
█████▀████▄▄▄▄████████
███▀███▄███████████████
██▀█████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██▄███████████████▀▀▄▄███
███▄███▀████████▀███▄████
█████▄████▀▀▀▀████▄██████
████████▄▄████▄▄█████████
█████████████████████████
 
 BitList 
█▀▀▀▀











█▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.
REAL-TIME DATA TRACKING
CURATED BY THE COMMUNITY

.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀█











▄▄▄▄█
 
  List #kycfree Websites   
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4410
Merit: 4770



View Profile
October 01, 2016, 04:19:26 PM
 #25

franky1, what happens with the funds on this address https://blockchain.info/address/12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX ?
Since these funds are counted as coinbase transaction then these funds are not real or can not be spend even those funds that came after a year or more?

WTF are you on about? all funds are spendable. all funds are real, no matter what date they were received
that address contains:
1 coinbase and 43 address to address transactions

a coinbase is spendable. but being a coinbase is not a transaction in my eyes. its why it was given the term 'coinbase' to separate it into a different terminology from regular transactions.

but as i said ALL the funds are spendable, all the funds are real.


I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
MingLee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 520


View Profile
October 01, 2016, 04:19:43 PM
 #26

I just want to know what is the first transaction tx in bitcoin?
You could google it next time, however as stated in this thread the first transaction was from Satoshi to someone else, however I'm not sure what the purpose of the transaction was. For all I know it was just something to test everything and making sure it works properly.
SmartIphone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 01, 2016, 04:28:15 PM
 #27

franky1, what happens with the funds on this address https://blockchain.info/address/12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX ?
Since these funds are counted as coinbase transaction then these funds are not real or can not be spend even those funds that came after a year or more?

WTF are you on about? all funds are spendable. all funds are real, no matter what date they were received
that address contains:
1 coinbase and 43 address to address transactions

a coinbase is spendable. but being a coinbase is not a transaction in my eyes. its why it was given the term 'coinbase' to separate it into a different terminology from regular transactions.

but as i said ALL the funds are spendable, all the funds are real.

If that is only In your eyes then it's ok, but in my eyes every transaction is a real transaction.
And the first transaction should be counted that one from that address that I mentioned.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4410
Merit: 4770



View Profile
October 01, 2016, 04:28:36 PM
Last edit: October 01, 2016, 04:51:22 PM by franky1
 #28

i know this is digressing off the OP's question. i still think its worth mentioning to teach people

IIRC most blocks after a block (if not every block) basically verifies the transaction and that's why older transactions can have insane amounts of verification under them. So if you really want to make sure that there was a secure transactions, just wait a few years and it should hit 1k confirmations pretty soon.
That's completely unnecessary, of course, however it's an interesting thought experiment.
firstly: every new block has a hash which is the proof of validity. every new block contains a hash of the previous block
this means it does not need to validate every transaction of every previous blocks because the hash of a block is the proof of validity of said previous block.
chaining the blocks together (blockchain) by having each blockhash linked to the next block means, if the latest block validates then automatically the previous blocks are then more secure as it is more tightly locked in.

in short. if you wanted to change a transaction 10 blocks ago. you cannot just change the transaction and slide it in unnoticed.
changing a transaction results in a different blockhash, which doesnt match the one saved in the next block(9 blocks ago). so changing the saved hash in the next block, causes that blocks hash to change(8 blocks ago). and so on

meaning in order to change a transaction 10 blocks ago. while the network continues making new blocks
you need to go back and do your alteration. and then make a block with a new hash
then need to then remake the 9 blocks above it with their new hashes each time..
and then keep going for every new block that appeared while you were messing around, until you overtake the networks account of the newest block. which is not a simple task.

secondly: ~144 blocks are created a day. so you will get 1k confirms just waiting a week

Yeah i agree because i seen my old transaction to the present transaction they have different counted confirmation ..
But the question why this is happening.
every time a new block is created ontop. that block only validates the transactions within its own block. but adds a hash of the previous block
thus chaining the blocks together without having to revalidating previous blocks again.

in short if a new block is created. your full node software is not going to recheck every transaction of the last 432400 blocks.
its the hashes of the block that has already done the previous validation. and new blocks just continuing to link chains of the hashes ensuring everything is valid.
this link to a previous topic will explain
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1627797.msg16369773#msg16369773

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
var53
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 345
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 02, 2016, 01:59:49 AM
 #29

franky1, what happens with the funds on this address https://blockchain.info/address/12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX ?
Since these funds are counted as coinbase transaction then these funds are not real or can not be spend even those funds that came after a year or more?

WTF are you on about? all funds are spendable. all funds are real, no matter what date they were received
that address contains:
1 coinbase and 43 address to address transactions

a coinbase is spendable. but being a coinbase is not a transaction in my eyes. its why it was given the term 'coinbase' to separate it into a different terminology from regular transactions.

but as i said ALL the funds are spendable, all the funds are real.



i know this is digressing off the OP's question. and being pedantic, and that franky1 already knows about it, but the very first coinbase is not spendable due to a quirk in the Bitcoin code. Every coinbase after that is spendable so SmartIphone would consider the second block's coinbase as the first transaction.

However, I take the majority's view that the pizza sale was the first Bitcoin transaction.
7788bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1023


View Profile
October 02, 2016, 06:02:40 AM
 #30

franky1, what happens with the funds on this address https://blockchain.info/address/12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX ?
Since these funds are counted as coinbase transaction then these funds are not real or can not be spend even those funds that came after a year or more?

WTF are you on about? all funds are spendable. all funds are real, no matter what date they were received
that address contains:
1 coinbase and 43 address to address transactions

a coinbase is spendable. but being a coinbase is not a transaction in my eyes. its why it was given the term 'coinbase' to separate it into a different terminology from regular transactions.

but as i said ALL the funds are spendable, all the funds are real.



i know this is digressing off the OP's question. and being pedantic, and that franky1 already knows about it, but the very first coinbase is not spendable due to a quirk in the Bitcoin code. Every coinbase after that is spendable so SmartIphone would consider the second block's coinbase as the first transaction.

However, I take the majority's view that the pizza sale was the first Bitcoin transaction.

The pizza sale was the first transaction that used bitcoin as a payment for goods (food). Any idea/link to the actual transaction id?
mastica
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 03, 2016, 09:41:49 PM
 #31

franky1, what happens with the funds on this address https://blockchain.info/address/12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX ?
Since these funds are counted as coinbase transaction then these funds are not real or can not be spend even those funds that came after a year or more?

WTF are you on about? all funds are spendable. all funds are real, no matter what date they were received
that address contains:
1 coinbase and 43 address to address transactions

a coinbase is spendable. but being a coinbase is not a transaction in my eyes. its why it was given the term 'coinbase' to separate it into a different terminology from regular transactions.

but as i said ALL the funds are spendable, all the funds are real.



i know this is digressing off the OP's question. and being pedantic, and that franky1 already knows about it, but the very first coinbase is not spendable due to a quirk in the Bitcoin code. Every coinbase after that is spendable so SmartIphone would consider the second block's coinbase as the first transaction.

However, I take the majority's view that the pizza sale was the first Bitcoin transaction.

The pizza sale was the first transaction that used bitcoin as a payment for goods (food). Any idea/link to the actual transaction id?


I do believe you may found the transaction on the same thread of the pizza, or do a bit research over google that should appear, anyway those history and first transactions made bitcoin born and become the biggest crypto currencie, and i do believe the biggest project online.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4410
Merit: 4770



View Profile
October 04, 2016, 01:02:30 AM
 #32

franky1, what happens with the funds on this address https://blockchain.info/address/12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX ?
Since these funds are counted as coinbase transaction then these funds are not real or can not be spend even those funds that came after a year or more?

WTF are you on about? all funds are spendable. all funds are real, no matter what date they were received
that address contains:
1 coinbase and 43 address to address transactions

a coinbase is spendable. but being a coinbase is not a transaction in my eyes. its why it was given the term 'coinbase' to separate it into a different terminology from regular transactions.

but as i said ALL the funds are spendable, all the funds are real.



i know this is digressing off the OP's question. and being pedantic, and that franky1 already knows about it, but the very first coinbase is not spendable due to a quirk in the Bitcoin code. Every coinbase after that is spendable so SmartIphone would consider the second block's coinbase as the first transaction.

However, I take the majority's view that the pizza sale was the first Bitcoin transaction.

the very first UNSPENDABLE coinbase
https://blockchain.info/address/1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
this is part of the genesis block and yes there are reasons it is unspendable as you say. (note 1A1 address unspendable note 12c address spendable)

but other coinbases for the other 400,000+ blocks are spendable
but other transactions for the other 400,000+ blocks are spendable

the first transaction was in block 170 https://blockchain.info/tx/f4184fc596403b9d638783cf57adfe4c75c605f6356fbc91338530e9831e9e16
hundreds of transactions (address to address) occurred after block 170, but
the first trade (known transaction for goods/services) was in block 57035 https://blockchain.info/tx/49d2adb6e476fa46d8357babf78b1b501fd39e177ac7833124b3f67b17c40c2a

after this point trades become more common and it became unknown due to no one advertising every trade, and so now we just deem a transaction and trade as the same thing and just call it a transaction.
again transaction involving 2 parties.
a coinbase does not involve 2 parties.

but this is more about "social interpretation" than anything technical

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
SANALIU
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 04, 2016, 01:14:20 AM
 #33

the fist transaction the first minner
zero block until 170 block
i think this fist transaction the first minner create satoshi nakamoto
tbterryboy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 323


View Profile
October 25, 2016, 06:09:27 AM
 #34

every block has a "coinbase". which is the reward payment/ coin creation log. no "spending" occurs

however a transaction between two people "spending" funds. is different.
the first transaction to spend funds happened at block 170.

their were many other transactions since then. but the notable one where a transaction occured with a real world result of the spender getting pizza for their bitcoin happened here
https://blockchain.info/tx/49d2adb6e476fa46d8357babf78b1b501fd39e177ac7833124b3f67b17c40c2a

Yes Franky1, I want to agree with you on that one... a transaction in my opinion is not just the transfer of some bitcoin from one adress

to another. The value in the transaction for me, is if value is appended to the deal. You transferred bitcoin to someone and you received

something in return. { service or goods } A tx feels empty without some value changing hands. I know a lot of people would disagree with

me on this, but this is how I perceive it.  Wink
Oh I see you are a good Economist. You are probably trying to apply the concept of transaction as viewed by Economists which you are right but most people will not agree with you because they do not know much about Economics, right ?
marleybobthedog
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 30, 2016, 04:30:17 PM
 #35

I had read somewhere that laszlo made the first real-world transaction by buying two pizzas in Jacksonville, Florida for 10,000 BTC. Then pizza seller "smokeTooMuch" auctioned 10000 Bluffton for $50 but unfortunately no one was there to buy those.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!