Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 12:51:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Faster network compensation against changed hashing ability  (Read 835 times)
realnowhereman (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502



View Profile
June 10, 2011, 11:51:51 AM
 #1

This is possibly a crazy idea; I won't let that stop me though.

At the moment, network difficulty is adjusted every two weeks.  During that time, miners can enter or leave the game, making the hashing power of the network different from when it started.  That means that unless the hashing power is static, it's almost impossible that blocks will ever be generated at the 1 per 10 minute target rate.

How about this as an alternative:

While miners are working, they publish their "best" block as they go.  They monitor the network as well, and don't bother publishing a block that doesn't beat the current best.  After ten minutes, the current best wins and all the miners start on the next block.  The "best" block being the most difficult of course.

This would keep the block rate constant.  Admittedly it would be a slightly increased bandwidth usage, but nothing too strenuous I think, as the publishing rate goes down exponentially as the "best" keeps being overridden.

1AAZ4xBHbiCr96nsZJ8jtPkSzsg1CqhwDa
1714913490
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714913490

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714913490
Reply with quote  #2

1714913490
Report to moderator
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714913490
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714913490

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714913490
Reply with quote  #2

1714913490
Report to moderator
1714913490
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714913490

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714913490
Reply with quote  #2

1714913490
Report to moderator
1714913490
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714913490

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714913490
Reply with quote  #2

1714913490
Report to moderator
ByteCoin
Sr. Member
****
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 416
Merit: 277


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 01:15:27 PM
 #2

This is discussed in http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=425.20

ByteCoin
realnowhereman (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502



View Profile
June 10, 2011, 02:27:42 PM
 #3

Thanks for the pointer.

I'll withdraw my suggestion as it's already been discussed and rejected.

... and I was feeling so clever Smiley

1AAZ4xBHbiCr96nsZJ8jtPkSzsg1CqhwDa
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!