Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 07:14:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: New SegWit stats?  (Read 5502 times)
afbitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2101
Merit: 1061



View Profile WWW
November 23, 2016, 11:13:12 AM
 #41

I found this http://segwit.co/


Can someone explain this in easy terms? If you run a bitcoin node to are supposed to signal segwit support? how do you do that?

edit: Why would you not support or not support it? I thought it was a no brainer. Increased capacity more efficient etc. What am I missing?

Only the miners can signal segwit through the mined blocks, your node will be counted only as a segwit node (0.13.1 bitcoin-core).


Just had a look at that link, still a way to go it seems
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
November 24, 2016, 02:54:33 AM
 #42

20% of hashing power currently supports segwit.
i would imagine that potential support for segwit (like this week) tops out at 30-50% ( way to many mixed feelings about segwit )
but who is this 20% hashing power supporting segwit
looking at the graph
it would seem like its two pools one of ~5% hashing power
and a monstrous pool of ~15%
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver9-2k.png

who are these poeple?

              ███
             █████
            ███████
           █████████
          ███████████
         █████████████
        ███████ ███████
       ███████   ███████
      ███████     ███████
     ███████       ███████
    ███████         ███████
   ███████           ███████
  ███████             ███████
 █████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
.
M!RACLE TELE
BRINGING MAGIC
TO THE TELECOM INDUSTRY

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
40% Biweekly Rewards
▬▬▬   Calls at €0.2   ▬▬▬
Traffic from €0.01 worldwide

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
      ██         ██     
        ▀▌     ▐▀       
       ▄██▄▄▄▄▄██▄      
     ▄█████████████     
   ▄█████████████████▄   
  ██████▄██████▄██████  
 ▐█████████████████████▌
  ██████▀███████▀██████ 
  █████   █████   █████  
  █████████████████████  
  █████████████████    
    ███████████████    
 ▀██▄ ████████████  ▄██▀
      ▀██▀   ▀██▀   
       ▄█       █▄
ANN
Lightpaper
Bounty
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
harrymmmm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 576
Merit: 503


View Profile
November 25, 2016, 09:03:54 AM
 #43

So ... bitfury finally started signalling segwit correctly (rather than just in the coinbase string).
That should add about 8% to the segwit hash fraction, bringing it up to something like 28%.

Check it out here: https://btc.com/stats/pool/BitFury

quake313
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 25, 2016, 02:24:34 PM
 #44

So ... bitfury finally started signalling segwit correctly (rather than just in the coinbase string).
That should add about 8% to the segwit hash fraction, bringing it up to something like 28%.

Check it out here: https://btc.com/stats/pool/BitFury



Don't think it will matter much, it only takes one Chinese farm to stop Segwit.
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3454
Merit: 4425



View Profile
November 25, 2016, 02:35:04 PM
 #45

So ... bitfury finally started signalling segwit correctly (rather than just in the coinbase string).
That should add about 8% to the segwit hash fraction, bringing it up to something like 28%.

Check it out here: https://btc.com/stats/pool/BitFury



Don't think it will matter much, it only takes one Chinese farm to stop Segwit.

I dont think so, ViaBTC will be forced to support Segwit when they are the last one, ore they will run out of business.
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
November 25, 2016, 03:00:47 PM
 #46

So ... bitfury finally started signalling segwit correctly (rather than just in the coinbase string).
That should add about 8% to the segwit hash fraction, bringing it up to something like 28%.

Check it out here: https://btc.com/stats/pool/BitFury



Don't think it will matter much, it only takes one Chinese farm to stop Segwit.

I dont think so, ViaBTC will be forced to support Segwit when they are the last one, ore they will run out of business.

if ViaBTC is the last miner to update to 13.1, yes i agree they will yield

              ███
             █████
            ███████
           █████████
          ███████████
         █████████████
        ███████ ███████
       ███████   ███████
      ███████     ███████
     ███████       ███████
    ███████         ███████
   ███████           ███████
  ███████             ███████
 █████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
.
M!RACLE TELE
BRINGING MAGIC
TO THE TELECOM INDUSTRY

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
40% Biweekly Rewards
▬▬▬   Calls at €0.2   ▬▬▬
Traffic from €0.01 worldwide

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
      ██         ██     
        ▀▌     ▐▀       
       ▄██▄▄▄▄▄██▄      
     ▄█████████████     
   ▄█████████████████▄   
  ██████▄██████▄██████  
 ▐█████████████████████▌
  ██████▀███████▀██████ 
  █████   █████   █████  
  █████████████████████  
  █████████████████    
    ███████████████    
 ▀██▄ ████████████  ▄██▀
      ▀██▀   ▀██▀   
       ▄█       █▄
ANN
Lightpaper
Bounty
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Si vis pacem, para bellum


View Profile
November 25, 2016, 07:09:54 PM
 #47

So ... bitfury finally started signalling segwit correctly (rather than just in the coinbase string).
That should add about 8% to the segwit hash fraction, bringing it up to something like 28%.

Check it out here: https://btc.com/stats/pool/BitFury



Don't think it will matter much, it only takes one Chinese farm to stop Segwit.

I dont think so, ViaBTC will be forced to support Segwit when they are the last one, ore they will run out of business.

if ViaBTC is the last miner to update to 13.1, yes i agree they will yield

They won't have to yield
Segwit will be cancelled for another solution
 in  less than a year

If miners wanted it they would have taken it the hour it was released
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
November 25, 2016, 07:18:39 PM
 #48

If miners wanted it they would have taken it the hour it was released
This is completely and utterly false based considering the reality that we live in. Remind me again how long it took for the last Soft fork to active (that miners obviously wanted, since it's active). 1 hour?  Roll Eyes

Do you participate on r/btc by any chance?

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
d@nte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 25, 2016, 07:23:46 PM
 #49

I still don't understand why there are some people opposed to the SegWit implementation. Isn't it something that will make the Bitcoin ecosystem better? What are the arguments against this? Could it take more than a month for the consensus to be reached?
CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Si vis pacem, para bellum


View Profile
November 25, 2016, 08:01:11 PM
 #50

I still don't understand why there are some people opposed to the SegWit implementation. Isn't it something that will make the Bitcoin ecosystem better? What are the arguments against this? Could it take more than a month for the consensus to be reached?

segwit is like an unwanted cock in the ass that doesnt allow users to use the main chain by making it prohibitively expensive
the blocks need to be larger .the solution is that simple ........
harrymmmm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 576
Merit: 503


View Profile
November 25, 2016, 08:13:10 PM
 #51

I still don't understand why there are some people opposed to the SegWit implementation. Isn't it something that will make the Bitcoin ecosystem better? What are the arguments against this? Could it take more than a month for the consensus to be reached?

Go into r/btc and actually experience these guys first hand.
It's like walking unaware into a room full of staunch feminists and SJW's. Every word you say is taken negatively. Every word you MIGHT say is defended against by a preemptive attack. Smiley
Quite funny.
So, after several coup attempts over a couple of years now, they have redefined english, new ways to think, etc. Like 1984.

Deep diving into all that (shudder) and translating back to normal english reveals a basic issue, I think.
They sincerely believe that segwit locks in a future where only layer 2 solutions to scaling are permitted.
So they think blocking it is a good thing.

But that premise is incorrect. Segwit only opens up new options, scales some, fixes bugs, etc.
It's just obvious, but I can understand the confusion coming out of that place.

CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Si vis pacem, para bellum


View Profile
November 25, 2016, 08:30:29 PM
 #52

I still don't understand why there are some people opposed to the SegWit implementation. Isn't it something that will make the Bitcoin ecosystem better? What are the arguments against this? Could it take more than a month for the consensus to be reached?

Go into r/btc and actually experience these guys first hand.
It's like walking unaware into a room full of staunch feminists and SJW's. Every word you say is taken negatively. Every word you MIGHT say is defended against by a preemptive attack. Smiley
Quite funny.
So, after several coup attempts over a couple of years now, they have redefined english, new ways to think, etc. Like 1984.

Deep diving into all that (shudder) and translating back to normal english reveals a basic issue, I think.
They sincerely believe that segwit locks in a future where only layer 2 solutions to scaling are permitted.
So they think blocking it is a good thing.

But that premise is incorrect. Segwit only opens up new options, scales some, fixes bugs, etc.
It's just obvious, but I can understand the confusion coming out of that place.



The blockchain is not anyones private property so obviously we  have a vested interest in making it impossible or prohibitively expensive to use, you may agree with that or not but L2 solutions are not an alternative to removing the anti spam cap
quake313
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 25, 2016, 09:00:09 PM
 #53

I still don't understand why there are some people opposed to the SegWit implementation. Isn't it something that will make the Bitcoin ecosystem better? What are the arguments against this? Could it take more than a month for the consensus to be reached?

Let me try to explain it the way I see it. The problem the Chinese have with Segwit, is not so much with Segwit itself but with what will happen after Segwit. The Chinese are afraid that the side-chains the core devs are working on will take money out of their pockets by reducing the number of potential transaction fees in the future. So by blocking Segwit, they are blocking side-chains like lightning network. The Chinese want bigger blocks to collect more money in fees in the future. At least this is what I think, maybe I am wrong or maybe someone can explain it better.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
November 25, 2016, 09:47:17 PM
 #54

The problem the Chinese have with Segwit, ...

Looking at the recent translations, it does not appear that there is any single monolithic entity 'the Chinese'. Rather it seems to me that there is a spectrum of attitudes amongst the Chinese miners. That said, your statement seems a reasonable representation of the concerns of some subset of the class 'Chinese miner'.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
November 26, 2016, 12:20:28 AM
 #55

ViaBTC is not problem ... when global POWER of Bitcoin network rise at regulary rate.

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty and http://bitcoin.sipa.be/


They already loose the race against adoption.
Like all old miner on BIP66.
They will be exclude by force by the miners.

Because miner want a reward ... after all.
That's why miners don't control nodes.
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 02:50:28 AM
Last edit: November 26, 2016, 03:01:36 AM by Killerpotleaf
 #56

blocking   ~33%  =  ViaBTC~6% + HaoBTC~6%  + F2Pool~14% + GBMiners~3% + Bitcoin.com~2% + Slush Pool~2%BU  

undecided ~36%=  AntPool~19% +  BTC.com~5% + BW Pool~10%  + Kano CK Pool~2%

pro          ~25%  =   BTCC~11% + BitFury~7% + Bitclub Network~3% + Slush Pool~4%segwit  

there's a 6% margin of error due to really bad rounding

read all about this : http://www.nasdaq.com/article/where-bitcoin-mining-pools-stand-on-segregated-witness-cm713991

i expect to see lots of action next week. i think segwit will probably gain >50%, will they wait for the other >40% to join them tho... they dont technically have too, all it would take is 0.13.2 ...

              ███
             █████
            ███████
           █████████
          ███████████
         █████████████
        ███████ ███████
       ███████   ███████
      ███████     ███████
     ███████       ███████
    ███████         ███████
   ███████           ███████
  ███████             ███████
 █████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
.
M!RACLE TELE
BRINGING MAGIC
TO THE TELECOM INDUSTRY

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
40% Biweekly Rewards
▬▬▬   Calls at €0.2   ▬▬▬
Traffic from €0.01 worldwide

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
      ██         ██     
        ▀▌     ▐▀       
       ▄██▄▄▄▄▄██▄      
     ▄█████████████     
   ▄█████████████████▄   
  ██████▄██████▄██████  
 ▐█████████████████████▌
  ██████▀███████▀██████ 
  █████   █████   █████  
  █████████████████████  
  █████████████████    
    ███████████████    
 ▀██▄ ████████████  ▄██▀
      ▀██▀   ▀██▀   
       ▄█       █▄
ANN
Lightpaper
Bounty
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
Wind_FURY
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 1839



View Profile
November 26, 2016, 03:17:00 AM
 #57



The growing support still looks good for now but I would expect this to plateau at some point and may start going down the longer Segwit stays inactivated. So what would be the next step for Bitcoin as a whole if it is not activated? Will we see some developers of Core leaving in disappointment? That is over a year of their work that might go to waste.

██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
.SHUFFLE.COM..███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
.
...Next Generation Crypto Casino...
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 03:50:49 AM
 #58



The growing support still looks good for now but I would expect this to plateau at some point and may start going down the longer Segwit stays inactivated. So what would be the next step for Bitcoin as a whole if it is not activated? Will we see some developers of Core leaving in disappointment? That is over a year of their work that might go to waste.

it won't go to waste...
we will have segwit in one form or another, at some point in time.... its unavoidable.
in anycase, all core really has to do is push out a 2MB HF ( and let miners vote on this BIP -_- ) and they win.
but let take it one step at a time, first we deadlock.

              ███
             █████
            ███████
           █████████
          ███████████
         █████████████
        ███████ ███████
       ███████   ███████
      ███████     ███████
     ███████       ███████
    ███████         ███████
   ███████           ███████
  ███████             ███████
 █████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
.
M!RACLE TELE
BRINGING MAGIC
TO THE TELECOM INDUSTRY

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
40% Biweekly Rewards
▬▬▬   Calls at €0.2   ▬▬▬
Traffic from €0.01 worldwide

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
      ██         ██     
        ▀▌     ▐▀       
       ▄██▄▄▄▄▄██▄      
     ▄█████████████     
   ▄█████████████████▄   
  ██████▄██████▄██████  
 ▐█████████████████████▌
  ██████▀███████▀██████ 
  █████   █████   █████  
  █████████████████████  
  █████████████████    
    ███████████████    
 ▀██▄ ████████████  ▄██▀
      ▀██▀   ▀██▀   
       ▄█       █▄
ANN
Lightpaper
Bounty
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
DaRude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851


In order to dump coins one must have coins


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 05:17:06 AM
 #59

I still don't understand why there are some people opposed to the SegWit implementation. Isn't it something that will make the Bitcoin ecosystem better? What are the arguments against this? Could it take more than a month for the consensus to be reached?

Let me try to explain it the way I see it. The problem the Chinese have with Segwit, is not so much with Segwit itself but with what will happen after Segwit. The Chinese are afraid that the side-chains the core devs are working on will take money out of their pockets by reducing the number of potential transaction fees in the future. So by blocking Segwit, they are blocking side-chains like lightning network. The Chinese want bigger blocks to collect more money in fees in the future. At least this is what I think, maybe I am wrong or maybe someone can explain it better.


Yes that times a million. Its a business which they've literally invested millions into. If the block size is limited = their profits are limited. Thats why they want unlimited blocks  Angry
i'm yet to hear a single good reason against SegWit

"Feeeeed me Roger!"  -Bcash
DaRude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851


In order to dump coins one must have coins


View Profile
November 26, 2016, 05:44:17 AM
 #60

https://bitcoincore.org/en/segwit_adoption/ is showing ~30%

Also interesting read https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/where-bitcoin-mining-pools-stand-on-segregated-witness-1480086424

"Feeeeed me Roger!"  -Bcash
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!