...
I'm not trying to argue that we *will* see a spike in price, rather, that the effect of a block reward halving is one of many factors that could contribute to higher prices. It's possible that expectations have overbid prices now and that, as a result, they'll actually fall. But, over the long term, prices should average higher with a reward of 25 than they would have with a block reward of 50.
Since we're clearly not getting anywhere, how about some data to ponder? Here's Litecoin halvening, I think Aug. 26 is when it happened.
Would you be able to point to Teh Halvening on the chart if not for the helpful vertical line?
Why did the price not go up, as the halvening faithful predicted?
Let's give analogies one more chance, let's imagine again.
The Princess (from our last game) issued a decree: "On Jan. 1, 2017, Princess Satolestia will buy all your Bit coins @ $10k/BTC."
Taking into account that you are the cunning and rational trader I know you to be, wat do?
Do you wait until Jan. 1, or do you start buying now?
If you chose to wait until Jan 1, why? If not, why?
While we have to imagine that Princess never lies, we can be 100% sure that Teh Halvening will happen, because algorithmically determined and maths. It's been announced back in 2009, and will surprise no one who cares
Yeah, I agree, that particular piece of evidence does not support the "price surge" that is the topic of this thread. That said...
But, over the long term, prices should average higher with a reward of 25 than they would have with a block reward of 50.
And look what happened when the dust settled:
Nothing to get exited about, but I would argue that the equilibrium shifted slightly higher.
As for your scenario, I believe you are suggesting that the halving is already priced in. I think you are right for the most part, but it may be only partly (mostly?) priced in due to the time value of money and the risk of holding Bitcoin to that point.
I'm not really sure what the disagreement is since we both have modest expectations about the halving. I may be slightly more bullish than you, but I think in general we are on the same page.