[POLL]! What is Craig Wright?

[mkc]

I like the tone, what is Craig wright?
Much stronger than who is.
A huge scammer.

[1715270856]

1715270856

[1715270856]

1715270856

[iv4n]

I`m not sure what he is yet, who knows what he wants in this moment. What kind of secret agenda he have. We will hear more news about this in that I`m sure. Situation is getting complicated for him, he jumped in deep water and we will see how will he swim.
I doubt that just he is involved in this, he must have some team or some organization behind him. Which one is yet to be seen, for now we can just create conspiracy theories about it.
As I understand G.W. need to answer some questions now, question about coins is most important for sure. We need to wait for his answers, he made nice mess with his first move, lets see second one and we will know much more.

[maokoto]

Even if he is Satoshi, there is some not very clear intent behind all this. Seems related to the halving somehow as ti is approaching.

[Soros Shorts]

I believe he is a piece of shit.

[Quantus]

A worthless bottom feeding peace of shit degenerate not worth the hollow point I'd gladly put in his head.
Hes a real scum bag and will rot in jail for whats hes done.

[ingiltere]

8 people voted for Craig Wright is Satoshi. They are either trolling the poll or new to this Bitcoin scene and don't know anything. I think these are only troll votes because even the most stupid person can see this guy can't be Satoshi.

[TPTB_need_war]

...because even the most stupid person can see this guy can't be Satoshi.

Sorry you are the one who is ignorant of math:

It's increasingly obvious that despite not being able to present actual cryptographic proof Wright is putting a lot of effort into obfuscation and trying to sway the public opinion, whether it's for his business interests or something else.

You do not seem to understand the math. Either Craig broke SHA256 or he has Satoshi's private key.

Also by getting core Bitcoin devs and their tribe to claim that the proof Craig provided is not a proof, he has revealed them as being disingenuous. Very clever political game theory he has concocted.

Craig has astutely accomplished his goal, as only 42% of Bitcoiners conclude he can't be Satoshi. And when and if Craig signs coins from an early block of Bitcoin, the level of confusion will increase. Craig is playing a political game theory.

I think bringing in a dead person into this is just a scapegoat by Craig Wright to confuse spectators. If this is true, why would he pretend being Satoshi by signing a fake message? Until Craig comes up with this extraordinary proof he says, I refuse to believe anything that came from him.

Refusing to believe is not the same as proving he is not. Craig is winning the political game theory. He is a clever lawyer mofo.

[tempus]

Really interesting is this interview with CSW from mid 2014:

Part 1: http://vimeo.com/149035662
Part 2: https://vimeo.com/149115042
Part 3: https://vimeo.com/149119154

At least it shows that he is a visionary and that he knows what he is talking about. I still don't understand his first blog-post but what I believe is: If he is not Satoshi he is or was close to him. At least he knows a lot about it all. With other words: I'm not that sure that he is just a con-man.

[Kakmakr]

Really interesting is this interview with CSW from mid 2014:

Part 1: http://vimeo.com/149035662
Part 2: https://vimeo.com/149115042
Part 3: https://vimeo.com/149119154

At least it shows that he is a visionary and that he knows what he is talking about. I still don't understand his first blog-post but what I believe is: If he is not Satoshi he is or was close to him. At least he knows a lot about it all. With other words: I'm not that sure that he is just a con-man.

The man close to Satoshi was Gavin and he might have had access to some of Satoshi's personal documents or even private keys. He is working with Craig to create a new Satoshi with old data he still owns. Why would he do that? Well, If Gavin can convince the community that Craig is Satoshi, he can once again get into the driver seat, because he simply have to tell Craig < New Satoshi > to tell everyone to accept Bitcoin Classic.

If everyone believe Craig is Satoshi, they will fall in behind his vision and his leadership, because he is after all the creator of Bitcoin. ^hmmmm^

[Quantus]

I told you he was a scammer. Since dec, 8, 2015! Everyone who even entertained the idea he might be SN are fucking retards.

[Jasad]

Is Craig Wright a hoaxer/scammer or the Creator of bitcoin?

You can change your vote if you change your mind.

i will not change my mind,i still believe that Craig Wright was a scammer or hoaxer,he claim as satoshi nakamoto but just have little proof,signed message si not enough,maybe if he dont claim back that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto,people will believe him.

[tabas]

I believe that Craig Wright is only a hoaxer / scammer because he only wants to get the attention of bitcoin people. Maybe he is planning to have a casino and after that he wants to get some customers by introducing himself as satoshi

[Enotche]

I think he is trying to pass himself off as Satoshi, he may liar.

"Craig Wright stopped trying to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto"

His personal website, statements about involvement in the creation of Bitcoin Australian deleted. There was only one note, where Craig Wright says goodbye to its readers.
http://www.drcraigwright.net/

[Wendigo]

To be honest I am still undecided about what exactly Craig Wright is trying to achieve at the moment and I don't like to make rash conclusions so my current vote status is 'not sure'. If there is conclusive evidence that Craig Wright is actually the creator of Bitcoin that's OK if not then I guess we will have to wait for the next candidate  All in all I am currently on the fence.