Refuse to believe ANYONE is Satoshi

[panju1]

There is proof that satoshi is one person.
It is a consortium of people that create this one great project so all can benefit from it.

Er... your 2 statements are contradictory.
Are you saying that Satoshi is one person or a consortium of people?

[1715331285]

1715331285

[1715331285]

1715331285

[1715331285]

1715331285

[NeuroticFish]

There is proof that satoshi is one person.
It is a consortium of people that create this one great project so all can benefit from it.

Er... your 2 statements are contradictory.
Are you saying that Satoshi is one person or a consortium of people?

My guess is that he wanted to say that Satoshi is NOT only one person.
This consortium idea is old and may be true too.

[Leonius]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Its a possible route, why would the real satoshi come forward? pressure from others hmmm?

[Lionidas]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Its a possible route, why would the real satoshi come forward? pressure from others hmmm?

He will not reveal himself in the realism of fear and greedy parties that want him to promote their agenda.
Imagine if North Korea got their hands on him. It would be game over for the rest of all countries economies thus plunging us into World War III.

[davinchi]

Decentralization is our power, one man/women should not have the power to change BTC as they wish.


We are all satoshi, ignore all others that say otherwise and question their intent when they say otherwise.

No, we should not have to refuse the real Satoshi. We should have to accept the claim of real Satoshi and it will never harm bitcoin but I think it will give more fame to bitcoin and someone will openly support bitcoin as father.

[Snorek]

There is proof that satoshi is one person.
It is a consortium of people that create this one great project so all can benefit from it.

Er... your 2 statements are contradictory.
Are you saying that Satoshi is one person or a consortium of people?

My guess is that he wanted to say that Satoshi is NOT only one person.
This consortium idea is old and may be true too.

But with more people involved in the Bitcoin creation process it is exponentially harder to keep whole project a secret.
And until know we are still living in the dark without any solid proofs about Satoshi and early days of bitcoin.
Are we on a brink of Bitcoin 'impostors' era?

[Wapinter]

Decentralization is our power, one man/women should not have the power to change BTC as they wish.


We are all satoshi, ignore all others that say otherwise and question their intent when they say otherwise.

But unfortunately we all dont have 1 million coins which real Satoshi posses.and that what makes difference

[monsanto]

Decentralization is our power, one man/women should not have the power to change BTC as they wish.


We are all satoshi, ignore all others that say otherwise and question their intent when they say otherwise.

"We are all satoshi" -- except non of us has control of $1 million bitcoins (almost half a billion usd) like Satoshi, so apparently one person does have extraordinary power over btc for as long as they want.

In any case, I think it is highly likely that one (NSA) or many intelligence agencies already know who Satoshi is.  At this point it may take an NSA leak to finally unmask him.  

[richardsNY]

No one is Satoshi untill the person in question shows valid proof by signing from Satoshi's old addresses. If that doesn't happen, then it's not Satoshi.

[yayayo]

Decentralization is our power, one man/women should not have the power to change BTC as they wish.


We are all satoshi, ignore all others that say otherwise and question their intent when they say otherwise.

Thanks spazzdla, for speaking my mind! Hopefully the centralist powers will not succeed in persuading the user base that growth at any cost is more important than decentralization. Without decentralization, Bitcoin has no value. It's the very essence of why it was created: To be able to transact free, free of boundaries and free of oppressive central planners.

Whoever Satoshi is, he is no god we must worship. He just gave us a great gift for monetary freedom. We should all do our best to improve this gift wherever we can, because it will be necessary to withstand those who seek control.

ya.ya.yo!

[Junko]

As long as Satoshi isn't really the NSA, he/she can be anyone in the world for all I care. I'm good.

[Lauda]

As long as Satoshi isn't really the NSA, he/she can be anyone in the world for all I care. I'm good.

Actually, it should not even matter that much who he is. I still don't understand why people have this so called "Satoshi-obsession".

No one is Satoshi untill the person in question shows valid proof by signing from Satoshi's old addresses.

That is not conclusive proof.

"We are all satoshi" -- except non of us has control of $1 million bitcoins (almost half a billion usd) like Satoshi, so apparently one person does have extraordinary power over btc for as long as they want.

1 Million BTC = 1 Million BTC; the fiat equivalent is irrelevant. Besides, nobody in their right mind would try to cash out a large portion at once.

In any case, I think it is highly likely that one (NSA) or many intelligence agencies already know who Satoshi is.  At this point it may take an NSA leak to finally unmask him. 

Extremely doubtful.

[monsanto]

"We are all satoshi" -- except non of us has control of $1 million bitcoins (almost half a billion usd) like Satoshi, so apparently one person does have extraordinary power over btc for as long as they want.

1 Million BTC = 1 Million BTC; the fiat equivalent is irrelevant. Besides, nobody in their right mind would try to cash out a large portion at once.

I never said anything about cashing out large portions all at once.  And fiat equivalent is only irrelevant in crypto fantasy land.

In any case, I think it is highly likely that one (NSA) or many intelligence agencies already know who Satoshi is.  At this point it may take an NSA leak to finally unmask him. 

Extremely doubtful.

You think the NSA and other intelligence agencies would be incapable of finding out, and/or uninterested in, this information?

[el kaka22]

I am Satoshi

Everyone can claim that easy, but in real claiming to be a Satoshi is not that much easy as a post here in this forum, you should have to answer a lot of questions and I think the real inventer should have to give his right of ownership, it will never affect bitcoin.

[Lauda]

And fiat equivalent is only irrelevant in crypto fantasy land.

Wrong. The people who only see Bitcoin in fiat equivalent are improperly using it.

You think the NSA and other intelligence agencies would be incapable of finding out, and/or uninterested in, this information?

Just because they have access to a wast amount of information about the general population that does not mean that they can acquire information about anything they want. It would not be hard for sufficiently skilled people to create and keep a encrypted communication "line" between them. Additionally, it is very well possible to stay behind an alias (for a limited amount of time) without being discovered.

because i don't think if i were satoshi nakamoto then i come out one day and prove the world to believe me,

Regardless of whether he would 'come out' or not, he surely wouldn't try to attract this much attention while simultaneously stating that he does not want it (which is quite a unreasonable combination).

[AlexM]

I am not Satoshi.

I doubt Satoshi would go quiet for years and then reveal himself for no apparent reason. I don't expect to ever find out her true identity, and I am happy with that.

[OrangeII]

Well basically Satoshi is someone who really mysterious, but I think he's really cool, like in the movies. he made a bitcoin, and then disappear, I just feel proud of him

[dearbesz]

i guess it doesn't matter if anyone refuse to believe anyone is satoshi.
as long as were here who loved Bitcoins, and believing by this thing we can save money through
this because of security,safetyness and convenient we will continue to use it.

[killerjoegreece]

shatoshi will never show himself

[isen]

It doesn't matter what we believe anyway,satoshi is smart enough (obviously) to hide his real id so he will never harm bitcoin and protect himself.