Refuse to believe ANYONE is Satoshi

[spazzdla]

Decentralization is our power, one man/women should not have the power to change BTC as they wish.


We are all satoshi, ignore all others that say otherwise and question their intent when they say otherwise.

[1714693501]

1714693501

[1714693501]

1714693501

[1714693501]

1714693501

[--Encrypted--]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

[Kprawn]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Yes, If you want Bitcoin to succeed. We do not need a benevolent dictator and a centralized figure head that can be attacked and sued. Satoshi should stay hidden and avoid these types of actions that

might come his way. We saw what Mike Hearn represented and how that turned out... individuals can be bribed or kidnapped or forced to do things, they would not ordinarily have done. We can even

see someone assassinating him, because he wanted to take the power or the money away from them, by making unpopular decisions. The decentralized decision making procedure protects individuals

from that type of threats. 

[spazzdla]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Yes I am 100% saying we should.

There is no Satoshi.

[JaneEverycunt]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Yes I am 100% saying we should.

There is no Satoshi.

Welcome to cryptohell, unredeemed sinner
There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

[--Encrypted--]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Yes I am 100% saying we should.

There is no Satoshi.

I fully agree that satoshi's identity shouldn't matter but denying the founder's rights to reclaim his identity are just ridiculous. and dunno where you get that but bitcoin will stay decentralized even with him around.

[calkob]

I am Satoshi

[~Bitcoin~]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Yes I am 100% saying we should.

There is no Satoshi.

I beleive there was satoshi a person or a bunch of guys experimenting but i am not sure there is satoshi alive right now.
But if real satoshi will came public, than i am sure he will not create panic selling all his million coin in market.

[icet208]

I really doubt that the real Satoshi will ever want to become public..owning that many BTC can be a real danger for him if he becomes public..

[praprata]

Decentralization is our power, one man/women should not have the power to change BTC as they wish.


We are all satoshi, ignore all others that say otherwise and question their intent when they say otherwise.

It does not even matter to me if he is Satoshi or not. For me everything will stay the same and nothing will change, my opinion about Bitcoin is going to be the same no matter what.

[unamis76]

What if Satoshi suddenly appeared, providing proof (signed messages) that it was really him? Why should he be ignored? He made Bitcoin, he should be regarded for the importance of his invention... That doesn't necessarily mean we should allow him to take control of the currency: one thing doesn't imply the other.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Agreed.  Someone invented bitcoin and he definitely deserves credit for doing so.  I'd be relieved to know that it's an independent person and not a nefarious government agency.

[romero121]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

That's right. We should never deny the real Satoshi. How come its possible to prove particular person to be Satoshi or not.

[Snorek]

Decentralization is our power, one man/women should not have the power to change BTC as they wish.


We are all satoshi, ignore all others that say otherwise and question their intent when they say otherwise.

Don't be blinded by decentralization - big changes in the history was always created by individuals, not by masses.
Satoshi deserve credit for his invention and honorary mention in history books, we gotta remember our heroes.

[Lauda]

That's right. We should never deny the real Satoshi. How come its possible to prove particular person to be Satoshi or not.

Well, technically there is no way to prove whether Satoshi is behind a certain address right now. There are so many possibilities that certainty is not an option anymore. Quick examples:
1) Satoshi was a group.
2) Someone attained access to some of his keys, somehow.
However, signing a message from some of the known addresses would be a decent start (unlike what the current scammer did).

[BellaBitBit]

yes i refuse. we are all Satoshi

[Red-Apple]

so you're basically saying that we should deny even the real satoshi? no.

Yes I am 100% saying we should.

There is no Satoshi.

I fully agree that satoshi's identity shouldn't matter but denying the founder's rights to reclaim his identity are just ridiculous. and dunno where you get that but bitcoin will stay decentralized even with him around.

i agree.
satoshi either if he is one person or a group of people can reveal his/their identity if they see fit and we cannot deny that from them.
but at the same time we should not give satoshi any more power than he deserves by making satoshi a god, for example i read here a topic about satoshi should end the block size debate by taking one side! that would be centralization.

[NeuroticFish]

There is no Satoshi.

There is no Satoshi until proven otherwise.

This Craig Wright seems to convince less and less people he's Satoshi. I personally believe that Satoshi (the real person behind him) is dead.
So for now, there's no Satoshi.

[gtglener]

If someone here is rally Satoshi and he have all the proofs about that and he is able to show that proofs to all over the world then We should have to accept it that yes He is Satoshi, We should have to believe on Reality and not have to remain in dreams.

[zend7]

There is proof that satoshi is one person.
It is a consortium of people that create this one great project so all can benefit from it.