fenican
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:16:40 PM |
|
Another thing to note - there may be players bigger than Satoshi in the Bitcoin space. Some investor may have quietly acquired 40% of the float. With the ability to create new pseudo-anonymous addresses at will there would be no easy way to find who who is the richest Bitcoiner.
|
|
|
|
MingLee
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:21:19 PM |
|
Personally, I'm against the idea that Satoshi's coins should be destroyed, maybe a majority of them should but the genesis block should be left as a sort of symbolic thing. The wallet should be left alone aside from that, unless Satoshi really is prepared to reveal himself and send out a signed message to everyone so that we know he's still around.
The question becomes, though, how would we destroy his coins, based on where we are now? Unless there's a fork or something to invalidate those coins, I can't see a way that we could accomplish such a task.
|
|
|
|
johoe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:30:53 PM |
|
BTW, if you still have old Franc notes from 2001. They are worthless now, because you can't exchange them into Euro anymore. It is estimated that the "destroyed" Francs would have been worth about half a billion Euro.
|
Donations to 1CF62UFWXiKqFUmgQMUby9DpEW5LXjypU3
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:31:20 PM |
|
Personally, I'm against the idea that Satoshi's coins should be destroyed, maybe a majority of them should but the genesis block should be left as a sort of symbolic thing. The wallet should be left alone aside from that, unless Satoshi really is prepared to reveal himself and send out a signed message to everyone so that we know he's still around.
The question becomes, though, how would we destroy his coins, based on where we are now? Unless there's a fork or something to invalidate those coins, I can't see a way that we could accomplish such a task.
well the first 50 ever mined are kinda locked as a symbol (i believe these coins hold the famous satoshi "bailout" message) this is thought to be a bug. noones knows if this was intentional of not
|
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool!
|
|
|
alyssa85
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:51:35 PM |
|
Note that he suggested a soft fork that activates after 5 years to make old coins unspendable, when/if it becomes clear that ecdsa is no longer secure enough in the long run. So Satoshi and everyone else have plenty of time to save their coins.
In fiat world, if you forget about an account, and haven't touched it in a while, you can still retrieve it. Money in "lost accounts" is yours by law no matter how many years you have waited to claim it. Ditto with bonds - it doesn't matter how many years ago you put the certificate in a drawer, if you produce it half a century later, you can redeem it. Given that bitcoin has been classed by govts as an asset, the same laws will apply. If Blockstream cancel satoshi's coins, he should sue and take them for all they are worth.
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 6823
Just writing some code
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:53:33 PM |
|
well the first 50 ever mined are kinda locked as a symbol (i believe these coins hold the famous satoshi "bailout" message) this is thought to be a bug. noones knows if this was intentional of not
I think it began as a bug since the transaction wasn't entered into the UTXO set. It has since become symbolic to not put it into the UTXO set.
|
|
|
|
whored
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:56:34 PM |
|
BTW, if you still have old Franc notes from 2001. They are worthless now, because you can't exchange them into Euro anymore. It is estimated that the "destroyed" Francs would have been worth about half a billion Euro.
That's what I say too. That satoshi character aught to know how unsafe it is to leave so much money on the blockchain without transacting with it, he should be protected from himself by someone wise, like Thermos. Plus we'll never have to worry about him dumping a million BTC on the market again, a single individual shouldn't have that kind of power. P.S. is there any way we could distribute those coin? Maybe hold a raffle?
|
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:57:33 PM |
|
well the first 50 ever mined are kinda locked as a symbol (i believe these coins hold the famous satoshi "bailout" message) this is thought to be a bug. noones knows if this was intentional of not
I think it began as a bug since the transaction wasn't entered into the UTXO set. It has since become symbolic to not put it into the UTXO set. ahh ok cool ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) and in your opinion was it intentional? for sure hey? prob to lock in the bailout message for everyone to remember for all of BTC's eternity? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool!
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 6823
Just writing some code
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:01:50 AM |
|
ahh ok cool ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) and in your opinion was it intentional? for sure hey? prob to lock in the bailout message for everyone to remember for all of BTC's eternity? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I think it was partially intentional to say that there was no premine and that Bitcoin wasn't a scam to benefit satoshi. The bailout message would still be in the blockchain anyways even if the output was spent.
|
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:06:06 AM |
|
ahh ok cool ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) and in your opinion was it intentional? for sure hey? prob to lock in the bailout message for everyone to remember for all of BTC's eternity? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) The bailout message would still be in the blockchain anyways even if the output was spent. o ok well that invalidates my question then, haha thx! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) as ya it wouldn't matter if it was intentional as you stated ;p the message is THERE.
|
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool!
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:11:18 AM |
|
When/If QC becomes a reality (this is a big When/If) and
After QC becomes a viable threat to Bitcoin and
After we have already forked to replace the QC vulnerable algorithms in Bitcoin with QC safe algorithms
Then and only then, maybe, we should consider possibly blacklisting older coins that are not covered by the QC safe replacement algorithms
Moving the coins from one QC vulnerable address to another QC vulnerable address just to keep them from getting blacklisted makes no sense.
This only makes sense after we have transitioned to new QC safe algorithms as a way to encourage (force) people to move their coins to the new algorithms.
At the rate QC is progressing those of us alive right now really don't have to worry about this. Perhaps our grandchildren or maybe our children.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:14:47 AM |
|
I'm keen on the raffle idea. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 6823
Just writing some code
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:15:17 AM |
|
When/If QC becomes a reality (this is a big When/If) and
After QC becomes a viable threat to Bitcoin and
After we have already forked to replace the QC vulnerable algorithms in Bitcoin with QC safe algorithms
Then and only then, maybe, we should consider possibly blacklisting older coins that are not covered by the QC safe replacement algorithms
Moving the coins from one QC vulnerable address to another QC vulnerable address just to keep them from getting blacklisted makes no sense.
This only makes sense after we have transitioned to new QC safe algorithms as a way to encourage (force) people to move their coins to the new algorithms.
At the rate QC is progressing those of us alive right now really don't have to worry about this. Perhaps our grandchildren or maybe our children.
Yes, this is exactly what Theymos proposed. When/If QC becomes a reality and After it is known to break ECDSA and After an immediate soft fork to add an OP_CODE for using a QC safe algorithm, then there is a planned soft fork for a future date immediate prior to the date where attackers would have a feasible chance of breaking ECDSA and stealing Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
gadman2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 977
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:19:12 AM |
|
Quit your complaining. Let the coins be. As soon as a single satoshi moves from any of those origin addresses then prices will hit rock bottom within minutes and we can all wine about this later.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:20:32 AM |
|
I stuck some pin money in NEM at its earliest stages. As an original stakeholder you were obliged to reaffirm your stake pre launch otherwise you wouldn't receive any coins. This was shouted far and wide for months on end and the deadline was extended multiple times.
Despite that you have people surfacing a year and a bit later screaming about not knowing anything about this. I wonder how much screaming there'd be if this was implemented. I'm pretty amazed at how little attention a lot of people pay to these things.
|
|
|
|
whored
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:20:47 AM |
|
I'm keen on the raffle idea. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) A million otherwise wasted coins that I can has. To hodl. And call my own. Only let's do this now, preemptively, & not wait until it's too late, like we did with that blogsize thing.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:30:58 AM |
|
Quit your complaining. Let the coins be. As soon as a single satoshi moves from any of those origin addresses then prices will hit rock bottom within minutes and we can all wine about this later.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fbloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com%2Fvoxmagazine.com%2Fcontent%2Ftncms%2Fassets%2Fv3%2Feditorial%2F8%2F27%2F827c5f70-be4c-559d-b705-f27d5a78dfa7%2F5697c03ad02a6.image.gif&t=665&c=2FxyupqXthY03A)
|
Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:34:04 AM |
|
Since this whole hypothetical is years in the future I choose to get a bottle and wine about it now.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
Evildrum
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 01:24:54 AM |
|
So we are planning to cut off his legs because he has become a potential liability! Interesting, but I do not like a idea of stripping people down because you feel they may be a issue later with the coins. I get the issue, dislike the solution.
|
|
|
|
GreenBits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1048
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 01:36:15 AM |
|
If Satoshi wants his coins so badly, then he can move them himself before they are destroyed.
What? Course he want's them. They are his. Leave them alone. Exactly. Why ass with his coins? While they do impose an inherent security risk, doesn't it fly in the spirit of bitcoin to essentially "regulate" someone's wallet? And how would it be clear if, when the coins moved, it can be attributed to a thief and not simply the owner of the coins? Better to let sleeping dogs lie. Might give those coins an incentive to move if we keep talking about them.
|
|
|
|
|