Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2024, 04:47:58 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2016-05-13] R3 eyes $200m for next step in blockchain journey  (Read 523 times)
LiteCoinGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2016, 09:49:56 AM
 #1

R3 eyes $200m for next step in blockchain journey

Blockchain company R3 is looking to raise up to $200 million from its big-bank backers as it prepares to spin out part of its business, according to people familiar with the plans.

http://www.efinancialnews.com/story/2016-05-12/r3-looks-to-raise-200-million-for-blockchain-utility


the money pit.

LiteCoinGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2016, 10:01:49 AM
 #2




surprise surprise

Denker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1016


View Profile
May 13, 2016, 10:03:49 AM
 #3

$200 million for what? For something that is going to fail in terms of disruption?
Ok ok.Cost reduction and therefore bigger profits is something for those banks.
A big chunk of that money will be burned for salaries I guess.And a few years later...sorry, but looks like we failed.Oooppss
Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422



View Profile
May 13, 2016, 12:56:04 PM
 #4

They already asked for something around 40 million dollars in fees from their participants. What are they doing with that money? If I was a bank I would leave them. But I am no bank.
LiteCoinGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2016, 04:02:23 PM
 #5

Blockchain consortium R3 facing unrest over capital raise

https://archive.is/SN7J9

Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080



View Profile
May 13, 2016, 05:04:36 PM
 #6




surprise surprise

*ahem*

Not sure if I understand your comment Litecoinguy, you have been highly supportive of Mike Hearn's projects in the past. Why don't you like this latest Mike Hearn project?

Vires in numeris
LiteCoinGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2016, 05:34:29 PM
 #7




surprise surprise

*ahem*

Not sure if I understand your comment Litecoinguy, you have been highly supportive of Mike Hearn's projects in the past. Why don't you like this latest Mike Hearn project?


Source?  Huh

TraderTimm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121



View Profile
May 13, 2016, 06:14:15 PM
 #8

Probably Hearn asking for more money, lol.

You mean a cabal of corporate jackals can't decide to get along? Oh no! What will Mike do when they run out of money to pay his stupid ass?

Does this mean R3 is a "Failed Experiment"?

LOL.

fortitudinem multis - catenum regit omnia
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080



View Profile
May 13, 2016, 06:31:29 PM
 #9

*ahem*

Not sure if I understand your comment Litecoinguy, you have been highly supportive of Mike Hearn's projects in the past. Why don't you like this latest Mike Hearn project?


Source?  Huh


Vires in numeris
LiteCoinGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2016, 06:41:38 PM
 #10

Of course i am in favor of that!  Smiley Maybe you misunderstood my statements.

Peter Todd is working on 2 MB blocks right now! So these are bigger blocks. I would like to see even bigger blocks (+4) but i guess it will be enough if we add additional improvements (thin blocks, SW etc).


(and still in favor of big asses too but i cant tell U more about that  Grin )

Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080



View Profile
May 13, 2016, 06:48:46 PM
 #11

Maybe you misunderstood my statements.

No misunderstanding, you were lobbying pretty heavily for the failed XT/Classic coup attempts. "No, just big blocks!" Well, here's the original post, right at a time when XT was the only "big blocks" proposition: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1151409.0

Vires in numeris
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
May 13, 2016, 09:08:09 PM
Last edit: May 13, 2016, 09:18:20 PM by gentlemand
 #12

Is it rather unfashionable to think that doesn't seem all that much for such a potentially universal thing? Maybe their beef has arrived after looking at the progress so far, or lack thereof, and perhaps the idea of giving them a couple hundred mil for spouting off a few buzzwords.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!